Very important
Posted on | December 30, 2010 | 21 Comments
If you are a patriot, lobbying the state legislature or a liaison to State or U.S. Representative or Senator on the issue of Obama’s illegitimacy to U.S. presidency, keep in mind the following
The SSA is stonewalling and refusing to provide any info in regards to Obama’s Connecticut SSN 042-88-4425, which he is using today in the White House and claims he legally obtained, while residing in HI.
as the state legislatures are reviewing the drafts of eligibility bills, make sure to include the following:
1. The candidates for the position of the president and Vice-President of the united states have to provide Secretary of state and elections committee a valid certified copy of an original long form U.S. birth certificate and a certified copy of the original valid social security card. when such documents are verified, the secretary of state will redact the last four digits of the Social Security number and will provide the public with the certified copy of the original long form birth certificate and with the redacted copy of the original valid Social Security number. at no time will there be any redacting of the first three digits of the social security number, as those signify the state, where the candidate applied for the Social Security card.
2. Above documents are required to provide documentary evidence, showing that the Candidate is eligible to U.S. presidency according to Article 2, section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, whereby the candidate is a Natural Born US citizen, “One who was born in the United States of America to two U.S. citizen parents.”
Comments
21 Responses to “Very important”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
December 30th, 2010 @ 8:35 pm
California Civil Code §1798.85. Security and Use of Social Security Numbers
(a) Except as provided in this section, a person or entity may not do any of the following:
(1) Publicly post or publicly display in any manner an individual’ s social security number. “Publicly post” or “publicly display” means to intentionally communicate or otherwise make available to the general public.
December 31st, 2010 @ 5:45 am
aside from the numbers of deceased individuals. number 042-68-4425 was assigned to another individual in CT, who was born in 1890 and who is deceased
December 31st, 2010 @ 6:49 am
Orly, who was it assigned to?
What is your proof? Is the proof authenticated? Meaning, is it original source info with an accounted-for chain-of-custody?
Or is your proof just from internet databases that are known to often have incorrect info. For example, Equifax used to say I was dead and I needed to go through a whole rigamarole to get student aid.
December 31st, 2010 @ 7:18 am
several databases show the same data.
Why don’t you do something productive and file an Amicus in my defense
December 31st, 2010 @ 8:51 am
Orly,
I’d be more worried about the State Bar of California than any amicus brief. The publishing of the SSN, especially after you’ve been put on actual notice of the California law, is egregious conduct. Of course, you should have already known the California law about this, but now you have actual notice. Or do you figure since the Bar hasn’t done anything about the rest of your behavior that you’re free to do as you please?
December 31st, 2010 @ 9:02 am
You didn’t answer chum lee’s question: Are these databases the original source?
December 31st, 2010 @ 9:52 am
There is a lot of evidence (like ss# fraud and birth certificate problem)that Barry is not a natural born citizen. But isn’t the best evidence our own laws? According to the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, Obama was not a US citizen at all because his mother was too young to confer citizenship on him. And according to the British Nationality Act of 1948, he was a British citizen because of his father’s British citizenship. So according to the combination of these two laws, he was a British citizen at birth–not American and not even a dual citizen. If I am understanding these laws correctly it seems to me that this issue is more important than the birth certificate or other issues. Please comment and let me know if I am going wrong here in some way.
December 31st, 2010 @ 10:16 am
Orly, once again, who else does it belong to? You point to those databases, but they all have caveats that note they are not 100 per cent reliable.
If you know who it also belongs to ask their relatives, or go through city records. Bottom line – you have no proof that trhe number was actually used by anyone else. Until you do.
Look we have been through this, I don’t agree with you so why would I help you. Your gumption and incredible legs are simply not enough for me to take time out of my day to assist a cause I disagree with.
On another note, I think you would have more appeal if you toned down the makeup.
December 31st, 2010 @ 12:28 pm
we have a pretty good idea, who was involved in this “luft gesheft”. There are people, who went to prison and stayed there for a long time with less circumstantial evidence, than we do.
Pay attention: who are the players, particularly on the international arena. This is extremely dangerous. I don’t know if you have children. If you do, think of the danger they are in. This should be the reason for you to get of the couch and start working on the issue.
Better yet, take a trip to Venezuella or Iran and think long and hard, if this is the future you want for your children.
December 31st, 2010 @ 12:34 pm
I can’t give out all the info
December 31st, 2010 @ 3:45 pm
If two parent citizenship was not a requirement for ‘Natural Born Citizenship’ there would be no logical reason for the adoption clause in Article 2 Section 1 because the founders were citizens of foreign born parents. It would take a generation to produce the first ‘Natural Born Citizen’.
January 1st, 2011 @ 7:51 am
Actually, the number she printed in the post is not the number he is using. It is not a valid number ( one of the digits is wrong ). Therefore, she is not violating any law
January 1st, 2011 @ 9:16 am
Surely those laws don’t apply when an illegal alien has stolen someone elses identity. This what Obama has done. Incidently, when Obama was senator, he used a different social security number. His income tax for 2010 shows the 040 number and when he was senator he used a different number beginning with a 5. Can’t recall the rest.
Chum Lee, you are disrespectful to Orly. She doesn’t deserve that and you should apologize. Attacking the messenger is stupid don’t you think?
Obama is here to destroy this country. He is a communist. here is the link to those facts:
http://www.newzeal.blogspot.com
January 1st, 2011 @ 10:36 am
Ro,
If she is so right, go and break a federal law and have her defend you by arguing that the DOJ is run by an illegal appointee due to an illegal president!
Are you brave like birthers claim Lakin to be or just a keyboard warrior?
January 1st, 2011 @ 11:45 am
Jim – Actually, she changed that number without bothering to note the change after I made my post. But she still has up the correct number in the post immediately below mine.
I wonder how quickly she will change that.
January 1st, 2011 @ 1:26 pm
Chum,
Being right and receiving justice are two entirely different things. A keen legal mind should be able to grasp the distinction.
January 1st, 2011 @ 4:07 pm
I don’t need to change the number, it belongs to a deceased individual. If Obama feels that I invaded his privacy by publishing this CT number, he can sue me, but than he will have to unseal his SS application and his long form Birth Certificate and proof that he is legally using this number. Please, pretty, do me a favor, sue me for publishing the CT ss number 042-68-4425.
Any questions?
January 1st, 2011 @ 10:30 pm
Orly:…LOL! Oh, yeah! Poor chum just has to “twist that dagger” in a little more! To suggest that anyone just go out and deliberately get arrested for something…is a lot different than being “forced” into making that “major decision” to put yourself in harms way!
And Patriots are NOT in the habit of trying to do “anything” wrong! As well, Orly just sent out an “invitation” to Obama…so now, we’ll see who’s the “keyboard warrior,” with “no guts”!
Davey Crockett…
January 2nd, 2011 @ 8:24 am
Can anyone file an amicus brief to support you, Orly? I’ve written a 114 page brief, but I don’t know if they take them from private citizens. How many copies should I make?
January 2nd, 2011 @ 9:09 am
you need to make 40 pages and one copy for Solicitor general