this was received from the Solicitor General. Obama was supposed to respond by 11.24.10. On that day he waived his right to respond. The Supreme Court is supposed to schedule the conference on my case based on my pleadings
Posted on | November 29, 2010 | 6 Comments
Comments
6 Responses to “this was received from the Solicitor General. Obama was supposed to respond by 11.24.10. On that day he waived his right to respond. The Supreme Court is supposed to schedule the conference on my case based on my pleadings”
Leave a Reply
November 29th, 2010 @ 12:27 pm
Can you move for a default judgment now, Dr. Taitz?
November 29th, 2010 @ 1:53 pm
The Obama administration didn’t respond to the Kirchner case either. They don’t need to. They have the Supreme Court in their back pocket – bought and paid for. The Obama appointees, Kagan and Sotomayor, didn’t even recuse themselves from participating in the discussion and decision to deny the Writ of Certiorari, even though granting it would have meant the loss of their positions on the Supreme Court. We must all realize that the Supreme Court has been corrupted and our Constitution is no longer being enforced.
November 29th, 2010 @ 7:07 pm
Just in time for the January 7, 2011 conference. You and your fans will know on Monday, January 10 whether the Supreme Court will grant certiorari. (We Obots already know the answer to that.)
November 30th, 2010 @ 6:40 am
What you don’t understand, is that it is an assault on your Constitutional rights, just as mine or 200 of my clients in the military. I lived in a totalitarian regime, you didn’t . You are allowing your schield to be taken away and to be hauled to the city dump.
Tomorrow your rights will be taken away and youi will have no schield to protect yourself. Do you people on politijab and fogbow understand this? I am afraid that when you get it, it will be too late.
November 30th, 2010 @ 8:30 am
Since Obama had to spend $200 million a day for his little trip he doesn’t have any mony left to pay his lawyers.
November 30th, 2010 @ 2:03 pm
So, Dr. Taitz – can you take advantage of the Solicitor General’s refusal and ask SCOTUS for a default judgment? Is that what this means?