from BirtherReport.com
Posted on | November 27, 2010 | 2 Comments
Attorney Taitz files Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court for Captain Rhodes/Taitz v. Colonel MacDonald/Obama, et al..
ObamaRelease YourRecords on 11:55 AM
This Petition is regarding the sanctions ordered by federal judge Clay D. Land in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia. The sanctions were then upheld by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. Case now appears on the SCOTUS Docket here.
1. Does the ruling of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Rhodes v. MacDonald violate the First and Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution?
2. Does the ruling of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Rhodes v. MacDonald conflict with the Supreme Court’s ruling in Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 13 (1954).
3. Is a Federal Judge allowed to persecute a Civil Rights attorney and sanction her for merely bringing Civil rights violation cases to his court?
4. Are members of US military reduced to the level of slaves or serfs, if they are refused a hearing on the merits of their grievances in both military and federal courts and their attorneys are harassed and intimidated and verbally assaulted and insulted by a presiding Federal Judge?
5. Can a federal judge arbitrarily decide, what civil Rights violations case he wants to hear and which case he will not hear, and arbitrarily sanction a civil rights defender attorney for bringing to court a case that he doesn’t feel like hearing on the merits, as it is not beneficial for his career?
6. Should a federal judge forward a case to the jury for determination on issues of fact and law, when a case involves a president of the United States, his legitimacy and eligibility, which by default, affects the career of such judge?
7. Is the whole nation de facto reduced to the level of slaves or serfs, when one without valid vital records, without Social Security number of his own and without a valid long form birth certificate is able to get in the position of the President; and Congress is refusing to hear this issue, claiming that it is for the courts to decide and the courts are refusing to hear this issue, claiming that it is for the Congress to decide?
8. Should there be a decision from the Supreme court, clarifying legitimacy of US president or an order to the lower court to hear the issue on the merits?
9. What Constitutes “natural born citizen” according to Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution?
The full Petition embedded below. Previous reports on attorney Orly Taitz can be found here. Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Obama & the Hawaii Department of Health and all of the people questioning Obama’s eligibility; [https://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].
Captain Rhodes/Taitz v. Colonel MacDonald/Obama et al – United States Supreme Court – Petition for Writ of …
Comments
2 Responses to “from BirtherReport.com”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
November 27th, 2010 @ 12:36 pm
AN EXCELLENT COMMENT
From: http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/11/23/the-rise-of-freedom-isnt-new-buildings-in-new-york/
“Bob1939 says:
Wednesday, November 24, 2010 at 3:07 PM
Thanksgiving is a time to humbly thank Almighty God for all our blessings, including his written word, freedom, liberty and life itself. At the same time if we have the presence of mind to thank our Creator-God, we should also be capable of discerning good from evil, and to be able to acknowledge the absolute seriousness of the trouble our Country is really in – at this time; due primarily to our obvious drift away from God and reality.
We have a ghastly, immature, terrorist, moslem, usurper, bad actor POTUS, who is bent on destroying America, ” and who is doing it quite successfully so far”, and a Supreme Court who must deliberate for days on whether or not our Constitution should be maintained? when they all knew well that this was coming. If they don’t now stand up for America – then they are traitors too, and “We the People” must take over with “God’s Help”.
This TSA fiasco going on right now is merely one more example of out-of-control-government, payback for our own stupidity for putting them in control of our lives, INSTEAD OF GOD. Anyone with half a brain knows that the best way to avert trouble is to open our eyes, use a little discernment, and observe passenger behavior. If that is called profiling, then so be it!…or does it make sense to create abusively stringent screening procedures, and then immediately exempt the very people who caused most of the initial terrorism problems we now suffer, while at the same time terrorizing every other obviously-innocent American-born traveling public.
While Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, LCDR Fitzpatrick and many other such HEROES, currently remain under siege by our fraudulent, terrorist government, just when would be the right time to bring truth and reality forward and begin arresting these greedy, self-serving hooligans. Also under siege is our economy, our way of life, our heart-felt love of God, our religion, our healthcare, our education, our financial system, our political system, and our very ability to restore logic and freedom. Please wake up, America, and have a Happy Thanksgiving!!!… hopefully with God in mind, and in Jesus’s precious name – I pray. Amen.”
November 27th, 2010 @ 8:29 pm
Orly, in the future, consider asking these 6 Questions to the US Supreme Court. Please?
1. Is the burden of establishing a delegation of power to the United States, or the prohibition of power to the States, upon those making the claim, (such as the President of the United States, or those aspiring to such office) as stated by 333 US 640 @ 653 Bute v. Illinois (1948), a requirement under Supreme Court ruling and the Law or not?
2. Is the requirement of presenting an identification of person, and proof of birth to follow 533 US 53 @ 54 and 62 in which both hospital records of where born and witnesses to the birth, be a partial fulfillment of 333 US 640 @ 653, in which the Court would recognize such certification as rising to the level of a jus soli claim for High Federal Office?
3. Is there a requirement in the Constitional Article specified as 2.1.4. (now 2.1.5) in which a Natural Born Citizen, and those seeking the Presidency of the United States, have sole legience to the United States at birth?
4. Does a Natural Born legience follow the condition of the nationality and citizenship of the child’s father at birth or not?
5. Is the US Constitution to be understood in the natural sense per South Carolina v. United States, 199 U.S. 437 @ 448 – 450 (1905),
Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U. S. 1 (1824) @ 188-189, taking also into account the influence of Vattel — even as cited in The Venus, 12 U.S. (8 Cranch) 253 @ 289-290 (1814) —
on the definitions of the framers in using “natural born citizen” in place of indigenes (indigenous) as used by Vattel?
6. Does every word of the US Constitution have its due force, as stated by Holmes v. Jennison, 39 U.S. (14 Peters) 540 @ 570-71 (1840); and is the precept of interpretation of the US Constitution to this effect, where “every word [of the US Constitution] must have its due force” active in the Rule of Law in the Supreme Court of the United States as it regards “natural born citizen” or not?