from the 9th circuit
Posted on | October 27, 2010 | 3 Comments
10-55084 Pamela Barnett, et al v. Barack Obama, et al “File a Reply to an Answer to an Original Petition”
InboxX
Reply |ca9_ecfnoticing@ca9.uscourts.gov to me
show details 2:56 PM (1 hour ago)
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Notice of Docket Activity
The following transaction was entered on 10/27/2010 at 2:56:16 PM PDT and filed on 10/27/2010 Case Name:Pamela Barnett, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
Case Number: 10-55084
Document(s):Document(s)
Docket Text:
Filed (ECF) Appellants Capt. Pamela Barnett, Richard Norton Bauerbach, Capt. Robin D. Biron, Col. John D. Blair, Mr. David L. Bosley, Ms. Loretta G. Bosley, Capt. Harry G. Butler, Rep. Glenn Casada, Jennifer Leah Clark, Timothy Comerford, Charles Crusemire, Thomas S. Davidson, Rep. Cynthia Davis, Matthew Michael Edwards, Lt. Jason Freese, Mr. Kurt C. Fuqua, Officer Clint Grimes, Julliett Ireland, D. Andrew Johnson, Israel D. Jones, Timothy Jones, Alan Keyes, Ph. D., David Fullmer LaRoque, Gail Lightfoot, Lita M. Lott, Major David Grant Mosby, Steven Kay Neuenschwander, Frank Niceley, Robert Lee Perry, Col. Harry Riley, Sgt. Jeffrey Wayne Rosner, Capt. David Smithey, John Bruce Steidel, Douglas Earl Stoeppelwerth, Rep. Eric Swafford, Capt. Neil B. Turner, Richard E. Venable, Jeff Graham Winthrope and Mark Wriggle in 10-55084 reply to answer to 1292b petition. Date of service: 10/26/2010. [7525181] [10-55084, 09-56827] (OT)
The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
Document Description: Appellant’s reply to Appellees’ brief
Original Filename: Barnett, Keyes, et al v Obama final 1026.10 reply to appellees.pdf
Electronic Document Stamp:
[STAMP acecfStamp_ID=1106763461 [Date=10/27/2010] [FileNumber=7525181-0] [8ebe8367b81069a89e6f9f22c2c8ba3f326e529d19aca855e8f51cb36ba84a2cf44af7208eb8c62a2c5965dfab9d130bc3d7b2c7e69057841d1ae6019258958e]]
Notice will be electronically mailed to:
Kreep, Gary G.
DeJute, David A., Assistant U.S. Attorney
Mr. West, Roger E., Supervisory Attorney
Doctor Taitz, Orly, Counsel
Tucker, Christopher
The following information is for the use of court personnel:
DOCKET ENTRY ID: 7525181
RELIEF(S) DOCKETED:
DOCKET PART(S) ADDED: 7305281, 7305284, 7305283
Comments
3 Responses to “from the 9th circuit”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

October 27th, 2010 @ 4:19 pm
Question. I just received my mail in ballot today to vote and you’re not listed as a write in candidate. So, I called to see if I can write you in. They told me that you’re not eligible because you ran in the primary.
Can you please post something to let us all know if this is fact? I don’t want to vote for Bowen but then again I sure don’t want to cast my vote for Dunn. What worries me the most is if I write your name in and my vote doesn’t count then I am essentially voting for Bowen. And I don’t want her because she will not keep Obama off of the ballot in 2012!
October 27th, 2010 @ 7:03 pm
I found this article about Kagan and Obama. It seems that they go way back to University of California:
https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/Kagan-and-Obama-Go-Way-Back-93267019.html
October 28th, 2010 @ 8:38 pm
Barbara, dear, U of C is not the University of California, but the University of Chicago. Do we have reading comprehension problems or ADD? And, the article simply discloses well known facts. What’s your point?
Go, Dr. Orly — you rock!!!