My Petition for writ of certiorari was filed wit the Supreme Court. It is time for the media to stop defrauding the Nation, please hold the media accountable
Posted on | October 25, 2010 | 2 Comments
FAILure to READ? LAWLESSness RISES!
Monday, October 25, 2010 3:50 PM
From:
To:
lindamuller@buchanan.org
Cc:
“Apuzzo, Mario” <apuzzo@erols.com>, “Anderson, WA Rep” <Anderson.Glenn@leg.wa.gov>, “Condotta, WA Rep” <Condotta.Cary@leg.wa.gov>, “Coulter, Ann” <acoulter@worldnetdaily.com>, dickmorris@dickmorris.com, “DirElectionsROACH” <pamroach@aol.com>, drudge@drudgereport.com, “Farah, Joseph” <jfarah@wnd.com>, “Klippert, WA Rep” <Klippert.Brad@leg.wa.gov>, “Kretz, WA Rep” <Kretz.Joel@leg.wa.gov>, “Kristiansen, WA Rep” <Kristiansen.Dan@leg.wa.gov>, “Limbaugh, Rush” <maha@smschaef.com>, “Lynn, TN Rep Susan” <rep.susan.lynn@capitol.tn.gov>, “McCune, WA Rep” <McCune.Jim@leg.wa.gov>, “PamRoach, WA Senator” <Roach.Pam@leg.wa.gov>, philjberg@gmail.com, “Robinson, WA LA Jim” <Robinson.James@leg.wa.gov>, “Sankey, Neil” <nsankey@thesankeyfirm.com>, “Shea, WA Rep Matt” <Shea.Matt@leg.wa.gov>, “Taitz, Orly” <dr_taitz@yahoo.com>, “TN-SWAFFORD” <rep.eric.swafford@capitol.tn.gov>, oreilly@foxnews.com, “Levin, Mark” <marklevin.show@citcomm.com>… more
Message contains attachments
1 File (1594KB)
SCOTUS 10-21-10-Taitz-USSC-Pet-for-Writ-of-Cert.pdf PERSONAL & OPEN COMMUNICATION
Mr. Pat Buchanan
c/o
BUCHANAN.ORG
Linda Muller
707 West Main Street
Smethport PA 16749
Phone 814-887-4134
lindamuller@buchanan.org
c/o
BUCHANAN.ORG
Linda Muller
707 West Main Street
Smethport PA 16749
Phone 814-887-4134
lindamuller@buchanan.org
25 October 2010
Dear Pat Buchanan,
Matt Drudge has a link for you on the Drudge Report – great exposure!
MSNBC provides you a media outlet – great podium (without the need of tell-us prompters)!
MSNBC provides you a media outlet – great podium (without the need of tell-us prompters)!
Your reputation stands on its own of an actual practicing Roman Catholic with integrity and great wit (versus the Biden/Pelosi flavors).
Therefore, please allow me to ask you the following:
How can the “truths” found in the attached official court brief
(SCOTUS to be filed today/this week) be brought to the
full attention of every US Citizen who desires to uphold
and defend the “rule of law” in our country?
The Congress points to the courts, the courts point to the militaty, the military points to the civilian courts, the civilian courts point to the Congress, the Congress goes on recess; the circus masters go on as the world laughs at the new clothes of American tyranny within.
St Thomas More put his civilian position on the line and his head on the block against King Henry VIII, to defend the truth.
Similarly, you are in a position to put on the line the truths found in the attached SCOTUS brief at MSNBC?
Literally, 310,556,000 of your fellow American citizens need you to expose the truths in this case filed at SCOTUS THIS WEEK.
It is NOT about constitutional eligibility as much as it is NOW about the “rule of law” blatantly being placed into the shredder. Soon it could no longer be not about the “rule of law” but about the “rule of faith” as happened under King Henry VIII. History shows the tyranny of unbridled pursuit of absolute power without a “rule of law.” And why??? Because good men failed to stop the evil !
“A country without a rule of law is a ripe garden for a dictatorship of tyranny without the rules of our Creator !”
Please take 15 minutes to read the factually documented brief evidenced and submitted to SCOTUS attached; please have the courtesy to respond.
Very truly yours,
Michael Angelus
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
2 Responses to “My Petition for writ of certiorari was filed wit the Supreme Court. It is time for the media to stop defrauding the Nation, please hold the media accountable”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
October 26th, 2010 @ 8:10 am
Orly:
Re Larkin:
How gracious of you to extend your hand of professionalism and compassion, yes Larkin IS agreat and brave American.
When the top office of the military refers to Obama as a civilian– the title of Commander in Chier places him into a hybrid category that cannot possibly be, cannot thorughly be CIVILIAN no matte rhow legally defined. that si why so many presidents–dictators ( like Obama) wear military uniforms–Pakistan, N. Korean, some south american countries, etc. The line of distinction between a militray in uniform that serves a civilian in civilian clothes is merely a matter of interpretative degree–perhaps only semantics. Would it be a civilian court thatprosecutes a civilian president for a vast military blunder, is there not a logical extention to a military trubunal question a standing pr4esidents tragic miscalculation in the military milieu?
The court that tries the generals is military –the chief general–Obama -wears a civilian uniform but gives a military orders–“COMMANDER IN CHIEF”– not P_resident, BUT the marial title COMMANDER–the president is in fact a MILITARY Commander and is subject to martial law–he is crossing into an area where the punishment for wearing a uniform is a court martial, all because he wears civilian garb? Well by definition the president is subject to military law for military blunders something outside the purview of the civilian courts. If the military is answerable to him, the HE is answerable to the military code of conduct ergo he can be court marsheled as a Commander of the military. I think the logic here is obvious. Larkin is going through standard military channels to drag the president–his commander into a military courtroom. Military says NO, commonsense says YES– and as to SCOTUS handing down fair decisions: You have an incompetent named sotomyer in there who was reversed 60% of the time by an appeals court. You have another twit in there in this at times really rediculous country of ours who was never even a traffic court Judge. How stupid is America to continance this absurdity and contradiction of reliable order in SCOTUS. Do you think these three leftist females in SCOTUS will back Larkin or berg or your good self orly?
Governmnets were toppled for less than the Obamanation and insults trust upon their people by the current horror in –I am ashamed to say–“elected’ office.
October 26th, 2010 @ 8:10 am
Orly:
Re Larkin:
How gracious of you to extend your hand of professionalism and compassion, yes Larkin IS agreat and brave American.
When the top office of the military refers to Obama as a civilian– the title of Commander in Chier places him into a hybrid category that cannot possibly be, cannot thorughly be CIVILIAN no matte rhow legally defined. that si why so many presidents–dictators ( like Obama) wear military uniforms–Pakistan, N. Korean, some south american countries, etc. The line of distinction between a militray in uniform that serves a civilian in civilian clothes is merely a matter of interpretative degree–perhaps only semantics. Would it be a civilian court thatprosecutes a civilian president for a vast military blunder, is there not a logical extention to a military trubunal question a standing pr4esidents tragic miscalculation in the military milieu?
The court that tries the generals is military –the chief general–Obama -wears a civilian uniform but gives a military orders–“COMMANDER IN CHIEF”– not P_resident, BUT the marial title COMMANDER–the president is in fact a MILITARY Commander and is subject to martial law–he is crossing into an area where the punishment for wearing a uniform is a court martial, all because he wears civilian garb? Well by definition the president is subject to military law for military blunders something outside the purview of the civilian courts. If the military is answerable to him, the HE is answerable to the military code of conduct ergo he can be court marsheled as a Commander of the military. I think the logic here is obvious. Larkin is going through standard military channels to drag the president–his commander into a military courtroom. Military says NO, commonsense says YES– and as to SCOTUS handing down fair decisions: You have an incompetent named sotomyer in there who was reversed 60% of the time by an appeals court. You have another twit in there in this at times really rediculous country of ours who was never even a traffic court Judge. How stupid is America to continance this absurdity and contradiction of reliable order in SCOTUS. Do you think these three leftist females in SCOTUS will back Larkin or berg or your good self orly?
Governmnets were toppled for less than the Obamanation and insults trust upon their people by the current horror in –I am ashamed to say–“elected’ office.