OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

3,587 miscarriages are linked to H.N. vaccines

Posted on | October 2, 2010 | 2 Comments

Thousands of USA pregnant women miscarry after the H1N1 vaccine

Christina England
September 27, 2010

A new report by the National Coalition of Organized Women (NCOW), states, that as many as 3,587 cases, may of either miscarried or had a stillbirth after receiving the H1N1 vaccine.

In an exceptionally strong and well executed report, written on the Child Health Safety Website entitled ‘Flu Vaccine Caused 3,587 US Miscarriages from H1N1 Vaccine,’ they say :-

“The corrected estimate for the total number of 2009-A-H1N1-flu-shot-associated miscarriages and stillbirths during the 2009/10-flu season is 1,588 (95% goodness-of-fit confidence interval, 946 to 3587). That is, the lower and upper range-probability of miscarriage and stillbirths due to the H1N1 vaccine was as low as 946 and as high as 3,587.

Eileen Dannemann, Director of NCOW, presented the findings for the second time to Dr. Marie McCormick, chair of the Vaccine Risk and Assessment Working Group, during the Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines (ACCV) meeting, Sept 3, 2010. Just prior to Ms. DannemannĀ“s presentation Dr. McCormick, had pronounced that there were absolutely no H1N1 vaccine-related adverse events in pregnant women in 2009/10, directly contradicting the evidence publicly available.”

Despite these alarmingly high figures being made public, which have been fully backed up with reports taken from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), the Government still strongly recommends that this potentially dangerous vaccine, reported to have killed thousands of developing fetuses, to pregnant women of the USA.

On 22nd September 2010 Reuters had this to say :-

“NEW YORK (Reuters Health) – Despite landing in the hospital more often if they catch the flu, no more than a quarter of pregnant women in the U.S. get vaccinated against it.

That’s according to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, which has issued a recommendation urging all pregnant women to get the flu shot.

While the recommendation itself isn’t new, the statement, published in the journal Obstetrics and Gynecology, adds evidence on the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine, said Dr. William M. Callaghan of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta.

He said the CDC and several medical associations back the statement, which notes that the shot not only protects the woman, but also her baby.

Flu vaccines aren’t approved by the Food and Drug Administration for infants younger than six months of age, but babies can get the protective antibodies naturally through breast milk if their mother got the vaccine.”

Note the sentence “Flu vaccines aren’t approved by the Food and Drug Administration for infants younger than six months of age” By recommending this vaccine to pregnant women this is exactly what the FDA, are doing, they are actively promoting a vaccine for use in babies of less than 6 months old.

The Bloomberg Business week agrees with the Governments recommendations saying:-

“Based on expert medical opinion, we urge all pregnant women, and women who expect to become pregnant, to get their influenza immunization because the flu poses a serious risk of illness and death during pregnancy,” Dr. Jennifer L. Howse, president of the March of Dimes, said in a news release from the organization.

“The flu vaccine has been shown to be safe and effective,” she noted. “As an added bonus, during pregnancy, mothers pass on their immunity, protecting babies until they are old enough to receive their own vaccinations.”

However, Elileen Dannemann is not alone in her concerns relating to the new H1N1 vaccine. The citizens of India have been very reluctant to have this vaccine. On September 5th I wrote the article The public of India boycott the H1N1 vaccine because they fear side effects I stated that Prison Planet had said that the Indian public were rejecting the H1N1 vaccine through the fear of side effects. In their article ‘India Rejects H1N1 shots after vaccines kill children’ by Paul Joseph Watkins, Watkins reported that the rejections of the vaccine en masse, followed reports that the measles vaccine killed four children in the village of Lucknow.

The H1N1 vaccine has already been rejected by Finland and Sweden, who have suspended the vaccine, whilst Poland banned the vaccine totally. The Hindu stated:-

Category: Uncategorized

Comments

2 Responses to “3,587 miscarriages are linked to H.N. vaccines”

  1. KBB
    October 3rd, 2010 @ 1:15 am

    What woman in her right mind would get such a vaccine while pregnant?? Especially with all the negative literature floating around about the dangers of H1N1 even to non-pregnant people! I swear, people must not read anything but news on the latest TV batchelor.

  2. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    October 3rd, 2010 @ 5:57 am

    this is heartbreaking. These women were far along in their pregnancies and could hear the heartbeat of the baby. In my office I wouldn’t even do a full x-ray set on a pregnant woman and delay any procedure, that can be delayed until after delivery, specifially not to trigger any side effects. So very sad.

Leave a Reply