Update
Posted on | September 3, 2010 | 6 Comments
I just got a phone call from the assistant US Attorney David Dejutte, where he asked for my consent to 30 day extention for the government’s response to my Appeal’s brief in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in Barnett, Keyes et al v Obama et al.
I refused. Their response brief is due shortly.
Comments
6 Responses to “Update”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

September 3rd, 2010 @ 12:07 pm
way to go, How much more time do they need. you’ve been through this for a yr.already. Maybe, they want to plant another scab in the system
September 3rd, 2010 @ 2:11 pm
Professional courtesy dictates that an attorney consent to such a request. You clearly don’t understand what it mean to be part of the legal community.
No problem, though. Mr. DeJute will simply file a motion for extension, cite his conference with you and indicate that you declined to grant this courtesy, and the Court will grant his motion. You might as well tickler the due date for Mr. DeJute’s requested date.
September 3rd, 2010 @ 2:11 pm
Professional courtesy dictates that an attorney consent to such a request. You clearly don’t understand what it means to be part of the legal community.
No problem, though. Mr. DeJute will simply file a motion for extension, cite his conference with you and indicate that you declined to grant this courtesy, and the Court will grant his motion. You might as well tickler the due date for Mr. DeJute’s requested date.
September 3rd, 2010 @ 2:19 pm
I hope you gave our love and best wishes to David, and thanked him for his service to his country, to We the People, and especially for working so diligently for Justice, rather than working to cover for Obama the Ineligible.
If the military judge feels Obama will be embarrassed, maybe we could offer a year of therapy. If it is true he would be “embarrassed”…which I find a little bizarre, but a good last ditch effort to try to appeal to our kind hearts….then he would never have stepped into the most visible and powerful public office in the land. There is nothing like hiding in plain sight! He could have saved himself much unnecessary embarrassment, or even worse, possible prison, simply by staying out of public office.
I think he can be reassured that we are not after impeachment. He ran unlawfully and misrepresented himself, so that is hardly impeachment. Luckily, we do not need to burden Congress with this dilemma. They do not seem capable of working together anyhow, and being the majority of them helped Obama into office, hardly a group to turn to in this situation.
God bless you Orly….in this battle of the wills, it is pretty clear who has the strongest!!
September 3rd, 2010 @ 5:06 pm
Hey, Orly:…Hi.
Just wanted to “hang some words here” and say that I and all patriots are so glad that you got to “stick it” to the DOJ-(Demons Of “Jive”) and let them see what it feels like to have a Patriot give them a little bit of “what-for”! I love it!
Take care and I’d love to see more of this type of (“standing”)-up to them and to the other corrupt, evil, and treasonous “vampires” that are trying to “take us for a ride”!!! Maybe? Maybe NOT!!!!
You ARE the “Premiere Patriot”!!! And DeJute and his “Diatoms” are not going to get away with their plans!!!
God Bless You, Orly! And keep that FIRE burning…to keep your “constitution” strong!
Your friend, Midnight Cat…
September 3rd, 2010 @ 10:32 pm
Politijabber, what part of the DOJ IS ILLEGALLY REPRESENTING OBAMA IN A MATTER THAT HE WAS SUED FOR fraud BEFORE BEING SWORN IN.. liar under oath, Chinese sell out, impeached by the House POTUS, and illegal campaign dollar receiver had to pay for his own attorney for his “affairs”.
Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681 (1997), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case establishing that a sitting President of the United States has no immunity from civil law litigation against him, for acts done before taking office and unrelated to the office.
In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Court of Appeals.
In the majority opinion by Justice John Paul Stevens, the Court ruled that separation of powers does not mandate that federal courts delay all private civil lawsuits against the President until the end of his term of office.