OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Same results with a personal visit to the Supreme court: No signatures of Justices either in Lightfoot v Bowen heard by all 9 justices in conference, nor in Rhodes(Taitz) v MacDonald 10A56 supposedly denied by Thomas. Please report it to Public Integrity Unit of DOJ, Congress and Senate, demand criminal investigation

Posted on | August 10, 2010 | No Comments

False notice of denial in Fine v Baca 09-1250, denial of access to Taitz files
InboxX

 Reply |joseph zernik to me, Josh, aaronklein21
show details 12:08 AM (17 hours ago)
Hi Orly:

My guy went to SCOTUS, but they denied him access to your two files, under claim that they were in Chambers. 

That excuse is far-fetched, since the court is now in recess.

I believe that the clerk is now more cautious, after the complaints filed with US Attorneys Office regarding false court records at SCOTUS, and is simply violating First Amendment rights to access court records – to inspect and to copy.

However, the guy did obtain a new record, which was missing from the Richard Fine files before, and is a new, unsigned, no name of signer notice of denial of his petition for rehearing on July 26, 2010 in Fine v Baca (09-1250).

This notice is void on its face. Moreover, it appears as a record that was retroactively inserted in the file.

Category: Uncategorized

Comments

Leave a Reply