No answer from Justice Alito yet. Today an abstract of judgment was sent to several parties
Posted on | August 9, 2010 | 6 Comments
Activity in Case 4:09-cv-00106-CDL Rhodes v. MacDonald et al Abstract of Judgment
This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended.
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply.
U.S. District Court [LIVE AREA]
Georgia Middle District
Notice of Electronic Filing
| Case Name: | Rhodes v. MacDonald et al |
| Case Number: | 4:09-cv-106 |
| Filer: | |
| WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 09/16/2009 | |
| Document Number: | 42 |
Docket Text:
ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT (tlf).
4:09-cv-106 Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Sheetul S. Wall Sheetul.S.Wall@usdoj.gov, Alison.Jasper@usdoj.gov, usagam.ecf@usdoj.gov, veronica.jones@usdoj.gov. usagam
Orly Taitz dr_taitz@yahoo.com
Rebecca Elaine Ausprung rebecca.ausprung@us.army.mil
4:09-cv-106 On this date, a copy of this document, including any attachments filed with this document, has been mailed by United States Postal Service to any non CM/ECF participants in this case as indicated below::
Connie Rhodes
Victor M Serby
255 Hewlett Neck Road
Woodmere, NY 11598-1452
The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
I am not sure what it means, sometimes Supreme Court would ask the opposing party if they want to file a response, an opposition to the filing. I am only guessing, but it might be a good sign, it might mean that justice Alito is considering my application. Two people on the list of recipients I met before. Sheetul Wall represented Obama as an assistant US attorney. Rebeccah Ausprung was an attorney for Pentagon.
I have no clue, who the other recipients are: AllisonJasper@usdoj.gov, VeronicaJones@USdoj.gov, usagam.ecf@usdoj.gov
Does anyone know, who Allison Jasper is or Veronica Jones? I am guessing they are assistant US attorneys, but I am not sure
Comments
6 Responses to “No answer from Justice Alito yet. Today an abstract of judgment was sent to several parties”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

August 9th, 2010 @ 2:56 pm
probably just a coincidence but interesting:
FROM
EXAMINER dot COM website
”Other key witnesses, such as
Veronica Jones — who now testifies in support of Abu-Jamal,
were harassed into giving false testimony. Two prosecution witnesses were given special favors, including exemption from criminal prosecution, for their testimony.”
Mumia Abu-Jamal is an internationally recognized writer, journalist and activist who is currently on death row. He was convicted for first degree murder of the police officer Daniel Faulkner
August 9th, 2010 @ 3:10 pm
Justice Alito could be intimidated too. Just like Land and Carter and Thomas too.
August 9th, 2010 @ 4:48 pm
The Supreme Court is on holiday for the summer…dah…….you won’t have an answer until they get back…they don’t have arguments or conferences until october Einstein.
August 9th, 2010 @ 8:14 pm
can you help me get in touch with her?
August 9th, 2010 @ 9:03 pm
The Verona Jones that Veritas mentioned died this past January. https://www.workers.org/2010/us/veronica_jones_0121/
August 10th, 2010 @ 10:15 am
Hahahahaha!
This judgment against you will be in the public record and downgrade your credit rating.
The chickens are coming home to roost, lying bitch!