Posted on | June 15, 2010 | 3 Comments
Hispanic residents get 6 votes each in suburban NY election
InboxX
Reply |P. B. to me
show details 11:35 AM (9 hours ago)
https://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100615/ap_on_el_st_lo/us_voting_rights_election
Good story to post on your blog.
Pamela Barnett
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
3 Responses to “”
Leave a Reply
-
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — Indiana Trial of Obama, 2nd Copy
Evidence on Barack Obama
Obama File with Exhibits
Affidavit of Paul Irey
Obama file Exhibits 1 - 7
Obama file Exhibit 8 - Part 1
Obama file Exhibit 8 - Part 2
Obama file Exhibits 9-13
Obama file Exhibits 14-21
Request for Docs under FOIA and Emergency Motion for Reconsideration
Exhibits sent to Inspector Generals and CongressPetition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
URGENT! PLEASE SIGN PETITION TO CONGRESS
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Subscribe today to stay in touch with our progress. Send this channel out to your email lists. Thank you for your support. CHANNEL (Google Plus) SUBSCRIBE TO YOUTUBE

Official Facebook
Recent Posts
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687

--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------

Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------

--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
Pages
- #409755 (no title)
- …Defendant Obama defaulted in Grinols et al v Obama et al
- …Grinols Subpoenas
- ..Grinols Order, Summons, TRO, Complaint
- .Affidavit of Mike Zullo
- 1. Judd v Obama
- 2. Farrar v Obama
- 3. Taitz v Sebelius
- 4. Taitz v Indiana, IN Judge Orders Trial
- 5. Taitz v Astrue
- 6. Mississippi Filed Complaint Update
- 7. Taitz Walters v Sec of State Kansas
- Videos
- Video: Orly before NH Election Committee










June 15th, 2010 @ 10:11 pm
If you go to the link, it does not say Hispanic residents received six votes each, as it is titled here on your blog. All residents voting received six votes. They were voting to fill six spots. Thirteen people were running for those six spots, voters could distribute their six votes anyway they wished. It actually makes a lot of sense, when you are voting to fill six spots, to be able to vote for six people. The only thing unusual was that you could vote for one person six times, two people three times each, etc. In the past they had only allowed people to vote for one person, the top six won the election.
But nowhere did it state that only Hispanic voters were allowed the six votes.
June 16th, 2010 @ 5:27 am
Julia,
The way it works you can vote once for each of the candidates. Not 6 times for one candidate.
They had some special circumstances re schools and lawsuits so a judge allowed this kind of voting. Also they have early voting which works out very well.
This still should not have been allowed though it sets precedence for voting systems nationwide. I hope not.
June 16th, 2010 @ 7:51 pm
According to the article posted they could vote for one candidate six times, or three candidates twice, or six diiferent candidates once each, and so on, and referred to various voters decisions in their allotment of votes.
In most situations like this the area is divided up into six districts, and people vote for someone within their district.
This was decided as an alternative for whatever reasons.
My concern was that the way it was posted on this
website gave the impression that the voting six times was limited to Hispanic voters, which is not the case.
I am not sure why the word “Hispanic” was added to the title of the article when posted on this blog, but it gave a false impression, and compromises the integrity of what is posted.