7 Responses to “Response received from the secretary of state Bowen and Attorney General Brown in Barnett v Dunn, Bowen, Brown”

1. art olszewski
   June 14th, 2010 @ 2:46 pm

   What in the world is goin on in Calif? Obama criminals put up an illegal carpetbagger from Fla. ,then you prove that he falsified his application and they tell Barnett that her request is untimely and disruptive. I say bullshit

2. Edward MacIsaac
   June 14th, 2010 @ 2:58 pm

   This is an outrage, and reflects the ongoing incontinence of the Jack Ass party.
   Eddie 87)

3. ch
   June 14th, 2010 @ 7:38 pm

   I think this would be a powerful pamphlet, showing the incompetence of Bowen and the trickery of Dunn. Actually, delaying the hearing until the campaign works FOR YOU. Ask voters if this is acceptable behavior to them, or would they prefer a Secretary of State who immediately and efficaciously handles ballot concerns without dragging of feet and favoring one side of another. This behavior of Bowen shows what an unlawful person she is aand works in your favor…it should be your top campaign focus.

4. Lady Patriot
   June 14th, 2010 @ 7:45 pm

   Orly,you do realize there is such a thing as a ‘write-in vote’. Voters who don’t wish to vote for those on the ballot can write in the name of anyone else they deem more acceptable to them. I suggest any of your CA supporters write in your name and vote for you

   Write-in candidate
   From Wikipedia

   A write-in candidate is a candidate in an election whose name does not appear on the ballot, but for whom voters may vote nonetheless by writing in the person’s name. Some states and local jurisdictions allow a voter to affix a sticker with a write-in candidate’s name on it to the ballot in lieu of actually writing in the candidate’s name. Write-in candidacies are sometimes a result of a candidate being legally or procedurally ineligible to run under his own name or party.

5. Jim
   June 14th, 2010 @ 8:24 pm

   “….. because Damon Dunn qualified as an eligible candidate for Secretary of State ”

   I guess they hope that if they repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it.

   In order to qualify as a candidate, the FIRST requirement is that you have to be a legally registered voter in the State of California.

   By leaving section 16 blank ( asking if was ever registered anywhere else – not if currently registered ) and then signing the form under penalty of perjury that all the information on the form was true, he committed perjury, making the original application invalid. Thus he fails in the first qualification needed to qualify, i.e. being a legally registered voter in the State of California.

   He can’t claim that leaving Line 16 blank was an oversight. On July 10, 2009 he requested from FL to have his voter registration record removed from the database. This is mens rea ( a guilty mind ) that he knew that he had committed a criminal act in filling out his voter registration in CA by leaving line 16 blank on the form. Someone who wasn’t trying to hide something would contact the elections board and have the “mistake” fixed. He didn’t do that. Instead, he tried to have the evidence expunged.

   He then commits a further crime in Nov, 2009 when he declared his candidacy – knowing full well that he had committed a crime in the filing of his voter registration, tried to cover that up ( but was unsuccessful ), but declared his candidacy by filing documents that he knew were fraudulent.( submitting a registration form he knew was fraudulent).

   So how the Secretary of States office can claim that after two documented crimes ( the perjury and submitting of false documents ) that he is “qualified as an eligible candidate for Secretary of State ” is incredulous. Isn’t the Secretary of States first duty to ensure the integrity of the voting process ? This surely would include making sure only eligible candidates are on the ballot.

6. hippybiker
   June 15th, 2010 @ 7:22 am

   I guess WE un-educated and un-elightend tax paying voters just don’t understand the intention of these people. It seems if you question Obummer or Dunn, You are accused of being a Racist. This is not the 1950-60s any more. We are not illiterate red necks. We are concerned, informed and Pissed Off Americans who are sick of this kind of race bating chicanery.

7. Ro
   June 15th, 2010 @ 5:43 pm

   Hw could O/Brien say Dunn qualified when there is overwhelming evidence that he did not and even a call to florida to have his registration as a democrat erased? This is more Chicago thuggery.

   Rise up America. Scream from the top of your lungs!!!

Leave a Reply