Courts allow short reply to opposition. This reply to Obama’s opposition I filed yesterday at 12 at night after a full day of work and after driving for 2 hours and fighting with Dunn and all the lies coming from him, his entourage and nazi establishment in Hermosa Beach.
Posted on | May 19, 2010 | 10 Comments
Dr. Orly Taitz, esq
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, STE 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
Tel: (949) 683-5411; Fax (949) 766-7603
E-Mail: dr_taitz@yahoo.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE §
Plaintiff, § HONORABLE ROYCE LAMBERTH
§ PRESIDING
v. § Civil Action: 10-151 RCL
§
Barack Hussein Obama, § REPLY TO 05.11.10OPPOSITION
§
§ TO MOTION FOR
§ RECONSIDERATION
§
§
Defendant.
§
Motion for Reconsideration is allowed and granted when new evidence is presented and when there was a mistake of fact or law in the previous order.
Three new facts are making an order for reconsideration justified and urgently needed.
On May 17, 2010 Taitz has received a letter from Holder department of Justice demanding $20,000 (Exhibit 1) for filing a legal action on behalf of Captain Rhodes, which Judge Land erroneously considered frivolous. This fact shows that indeed damages and not conjectural, but rather imminent and substantial, which makes the complaint for fraud filed by Taitz, proper and justified. Taitz has submitted to this court a transcript of the assembly of the republic of Kenya March 25, 2010 session, where Minister of Lands, James Orengo, clearly stated that Obama was born in Kenya. Affidavits from former senior deportation officer with the department of Homeland security John Sampson, as well as investigator Susan Daniels and retired Scotland Yard investigator Neil Sankey and official records of Selective Service show Obama using Social Security number 042-68-4425, which was assigned in the state of Connecticut to another individual born in 1890, which is consistent with all the other evidence of Obama’s foreign birth and need to use a stolen social security number. All of this evidence points to the fact that Barack Hussein Obama indeed committed massive fraud by submitting his candidacy for the position of the President. It was foreseeable, that proud members of US military, particularly officers will rise and revolt and demand disclosure of the original birth records of the Commander in Chief to ascertain if the orders coming from him down the chain of command are legal, as well as explanation, as to why Obama is using stolen social security numbers. It was foreseeable, that those members of the military will hire an attorney. It was foreseeable that such attorney will be persecuted for representing members of the military standing up to this massive fraud perpetrated by Obama. Current letter of demand of $20,000 and threat “to pursue enforced collection against you’ directly flaws from fraud committed by Obama. As such, this new evidence shows that Taitz has proper standing to sue Obama for fraud, as she was a foreseeable victim, foreseeable plaintiff and she suffered damages as a result and as a foreseeable consequence of fraud committed by Obama.
Additionally, new evidence presented in the form of today’s article in Mother Jones magazine Exhibit 2 shows that there was a concerted effort of intimidation and harassment of Taitz. Previously in her complaint Taitz presented evidence of her car being tampered with, a group of convicted felons, convicted forgers were working in unison and were submitting perjured affidavits, that looked prepared by the same law firm, as well as “art work”, despicable in nature with a common desire to intimidate and harass Taitz and her whole family and pressure her to give up her legal pursuit of fraud committed by Obama and her campaign for the position of CA secretary of state. Defense claimed that all of those incidents were unrelated and did not show concerted effort or damages. Recent article by Washington burro correspondent Stephanie Mencimer shows that “artist” Dan Lacey, who painted despicable art work series “Birther Orly Taitz”, showing Taitz nude, with her legs spread, giving birth and holding bloody placenta, which were sent to her children, posted on the Internet and a local paper, did not work on his own accord. Dan Lacey admitted, that he was commissioned, paid by someone to do this, it was a clear attempt to intimidate Taitz and pressure her to withdraw as a candidate. As far as damages are concerned $20,000 is only the tip of the iceberg, as immeasurable emotional damage was caused to Taitz and her whole family. Lacey refused to provide reporter Stephanie Mencimer with the name of the person who hired him, who paid him, however during the depositions and upon subpoena this information will be available and will be provided to court. At the onset of the litigation Taitz cannot provide all the evidence and is not obligated to do so. Taitz has showed sufficient evidence to show that she has standing to proceed. This particular evidence is crucial, as it shows concerted effort. At this time Taitz cannot state with certainty who paid Dan Lacey, however it is common knowledge, that Billionaire George Soros, one of the biggest backers of Obama, through his organization Moveon.org, has commissioned numerous artists to promote Obama and denigrate his opponents and critics. Only discovery will provide the names of all the Jane Does and John Does involved. At the end of the day Watergate was unraveled by tracing the moneys received, the bank accounts of the Watergate burglars, ObamaFraudGate will be fully exposed by tracing the bank accounts of individuals who were involved in intimidation and harassment of Taitz, her family and others and the bank accounts of individuals and organizations that commissioned them, as well as tracing financial transactions correlating to multiple social security numbers found in the National databases for Barack Obama, Barry Obama and Michelle Obama as well as multiple current job employments listed in the dossiers.
Yet another fact, that became known after the original order was issued, is the fact that Obama has appointed Solicitor General Elena Kagan to the position of the Supreme Court judge. Many wondered why would the President appoint a candidate, who never worked as a judge, not even as a small claims court judge, not even as a traffic court judge. This fact becomes less perplexing in light of the following information: Taitz forwarded to Kagan, as a solicitor general, not only her pleadings of Lightfoot v Bowen, submitted to the Supreme Court and distributed by Chief Justice John Roberts for conference of all nine justices, not only Quo Warranto submitted to the Supreme Court, but also all the dossiers sent to Attorney General Holder. Kagan was sworn to uphold the Constitution and act on behalf of the People of the United States of America, as a solicitor, top advocate for the United States of America, not as a private attorney for Obama, she received information regarding the fact that Obama’s Social Security number was assigned to another individual, that the certification of life birth provided by Obama to the public could not be considered genuine without analyzing the original, yet she did not take action and remained silent. In light of all of the above a question begs to be asked: was there a quid pro quo, was the appointment to the Supreme Court a thank you for her silence? This new development makes it so much more important to proceed with discovery in this case, see the evidence. Otherwise we might end up with a justice of the Supreme Court who was aiding and abetting the most outrageous felonies this nation has ever known.
Opposition to motion for reconsideration also includes a challenge to adding former Presidential Candidate Allan Keyes and Vice presidential Candidate Gail Lightfoot, questioning standing. Standing in this case is quite clear. If one ran in the presidential election, which was won by a candidate, committing fraud, party that lost has suffered damages in the form of lost election. Moreover, Ambassador Keyes ran against Obama in senatorial election in 2004. Taitz has moved this honorable court to grant her privilege to represent these clients without a signature of a local counsel. In extraordinary circumstances a presiding judge can grant Pro Hac Vice or admission to the court without a signature of the local counsel, only with a signature of the presiding judge. As most attorneys are simply paralyzed with fear to stand up to the sitting president and establishment, this constitutes such extraordinary circumstance.
Wherefore,
Plaintiff respectfully moves to grant her motion for reconsideration.
Comments
10 Responses to “Courts allow short reply to opposition. This reply to Obama’s opposition I filed yesterday at 12 at night after a full day of work and after driving for 2 hours and fighting with Dunn and all the lies coming from him, his entourage and nazi establishment in Hermosa Beach.”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
May 19th, 2010 @ 7:23 am
Message to Orly.
Pay up bitch.
May 19th, 2010 @ 12:09 pm
Orly, your reply seems so reasonable and factual that no fair-minded judge should reject it. Of course ‘fair-minded’ as always will be the hurdle . . .
May 19th, 2010 @ 12:16 pm
This man should be fired immediately !!
Hugh Randolph Aderhold, Jr.
U.S. Attorney’s Office
PO BOX 1702
MACON, GA 31202-1702
(478) 621-2728
Fax: (478) 621-2710
randy.aderhold@usdoj.gov
May 19th, 2010 @ 1:25 pm
I don’t believe it was him, I believe hackers are playing games
May 20th, 2010 @ 1:08 am
Orly
I will bow to your judgment on this 🙂
However………if that is the case,
should he not be informed that his
name and reputation are being tainted?
It MIGHT even open his eyes somewhat,
although I really doubt it. haha
May 20th, 2010 @ 1:54 pm
Why doesn’t the real Aderhold, if he exists, use the FBI to go after the hackers for defamation? Is he powerless within the DOJ?
May 20th, 2010 @ 7:55 pm
Kudos on the report about your Quo Warranto activity on the ObamaReleaseYourRecords website!
and it is also being discussed on Greta Wire Forum! THERE IS PLENTY OF INTEREST even if the MSM plays like an ostrich!
May 21st, 2010 @ 6:23 am
I talked to Mr. Aderhold. I asked him, why US attorney’s office doesn’t do it’s job, why should I, a mother of 3 do their job pro-bono, on my own dime. He had no answer. I think every decent American should ask Holder, Kagan, US attorneys around the country, why don’t they do their job, why are they aiding and abetting crimes commited by Obama? he had no answer. He just told me to write to him what I am planning to do next, meaning put it in writing that I will be appealing to the Supreme Court, he refused to talk about anything else
May 21st, 2010 @ 6:33 am
Don’t you first need to appeal to the DC Circuit?
May 21st, 2010 @ 10:57 am
no, motion for reconsideration is filed before it goes to the court of appeals