12 Responses to “LTC Lakin”

1. Jim
   May 7th, 2010 @ 11:56 pm

   “During the Anderson Cooper interview, Mr. Jensen did seem to concede that Hawaii officials wouldn’t be testifying at the court-martial. If thedefense recognizes that, one does wonder what the point of all this is.”

   The point is that Hawaii officials don’t need to testify. All they have to do is turn over the documents in discovery when provided with an order from the court to do so. Now if they refuse to do so – which is in direct violation of Hawaii law – if it were a civilian court ( don’t know the rules in a military court ) they could be called in to testify and explain their actions or else be held in contempt.

2. PorkRoll
   May 8th, 2010 @ 1:16 am

   This was a total Anderson Cooper hit piece. (Shouldn’t surprise anyone, really.) Cooper spoke to the honorable and courageous Lt. Col. Lakin like he was a piece of garbage and a traitor. So, Mr. Cooper, what have you done for your country other than date its eligible men?

3. Yephora
   May 8th, 2010 @ 6:50 am

   Radio’s Steve Malzberg interviewed the pair a week ago. I was dismayed to hear Dr. Lakin. He sounded dispirited, shaken – almost lost. The lawyer tried his best to sound upbeat but boy, this was not at all encouraging. Please pray for Dr. Lakin.

4. Veritas
   May 8th, 2010 @ 6:52 am

   Anderson was an UNWITTING and UNWILLING Patriot..he tried to DEMEAN and BELITTLE a patriot and showed all the world the MORAL POVERTY of the Obots!

   America is only STRONGER after Anderson’s juvenile antics!

   In his silence, Lakin stood noble and unswerving…the PERSONIFICATION of the CONSTITUTION!

   All the media will have to report now, or CNN gets an “interview” (vilification as the PostEmail calls it) coup…

   Here we go! The Roller Coaster begins!

5. natural born citizen party
   May 8th, 2010 @ 6:54 am

   I guess Hawaii should be called a “citizenship title-washing state” and be given a full faith and credit pass to generate natural born citizen POTUS/CINC US constitutional eligibility titles to the foreign national fathered births delivered world-wide to female citizens of the great State of Hawaii — site of the original Pearl Harbor event where various senior (O-5 and above) line officers in HI and DC somehow missed the call on Japan fleet movements related to Hawaii.

6. tom
   May 8th, 2010 @ 7:16 am

   Lt Col Lakin needs to proceed armed with what we do know to be the truth:

   FROM THE “JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UNITED STATES” VOLUME 33 p398 January 28, 1839 :
   “Resolved, That the Commitee on the Judiciary be instructed to inquire on the expediency of so amending the law on the subject of naturalization, as to EXCLUDE THOSE FROM THE PRIVLEGES OF NATURAL BORN CITIZENS WHO are or shall BE BORN OF PARENTS who have been removed or shall remove, from the United States, and have or shall take the oath of allegiance to the Government in which they so reside, until such persons shall become naturalized LIKE OTHER FOREIGNERS, agreeably to the laws that now do or hereafter may exist on that subject.”(my caps)
   From Article entitled “Massachusetts & South Carolina”, source:The New Englander L Rev Vol 3 1845 p414
   “The expression ‘citizen of the United States’ occurs in the clauses prescribing qualifications for Representatives, for Senators, and for President. In the latter the term ‘natural born citizen’ is used & EXCLUDES ALL PERSONS OWING ALLEGIANCE BY BIRTH TO FOREIGN STATES; in the other cases the word ‘citizen’ is used without the adjective & excludes persons owing allegiance to foreign states, unless naturalized under our laws.”(my caps) Note: “The New Englander” was a publication that stood, in great measure, as a tribute to patriot and Revolutionary War hero General Joseph Palmer He gave his life & fortune for ‘the cause’

   U.S. Congressman, abolitionist, “Father of the 14th Amendment” John Bingham confirms understanding & construction Framers used re birthright & jurisdictIon in the House March 1866:
   “I find no fault with the introductory clause which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States OF PARENTS NOT OWING ALLEGIANCE TO ANY FOREIGN SOVEREIGNTY is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen..”

   The ADMISSION via “Fight the Smears”
   The Obama Campaign states that BO Jr was subject to British Law at birth. This is FACT not allegation
   “… As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose CITIZENSHIP STATUS WAS GOVERNED BY The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act GOVERNED the status of Obama Sr.s children

7. Leonard McCauley
   May 8th, 2010 @ 11:44 am

   Lt. Col. Lakin and his attorney reminded me of a Tank in battle with small arms fire directed at them. Every bullet Anderson Cooper fired seemed to bounce off of them. Neither one ever flinched.

8. rodney
   May 8th, 2010 @ 12:14 pm

   This is the sad state of affairs–we don’t NEED Lakin to be granted discovery or even go to trial. We ALREADY know enough to arrest Obama. But the rule of law has broken down in your country, and indeed throughout the world.

9. Al
   May 8th, 2010 @ 5:02 pm

   Without giving away LTC Lakin’s gameplan, be sure that there is more to the plan than they can speak of in public. This issue is O’s achielles heel.

10. Catbertt
    May 8th, 2010 @ 9:24 pm

    The stupidity burns here.

    Lakin is headed to the fryer an there isn’t anything y’all can do about it.

11. Alec
    May 9th, 2010 @ 6:51 am

    Anderson Cooper is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and has CIA affiliation. For Lakin and his attorney to submit to this interview without their ducks in a row, without the central talking points, is negligent verging on suspicious.

12. Steve
    May 9th, 2010 @ 9:06 am

    How many of you people have ever ordered a copy of your birth certificate, marriage certificate or death certificate from a State.
    I do a lot of genealogy work and through the years I have ordered probably 500 copies.
    You received a certified copy of the original document or a certified copy of scanned original document. You do not receive a document with missing information from original document that is imput into a computer on a new form and passed off as original document like the document Obama and his media friends are trying to pass off as the original document which most certainly is not a certified copy of original information.
    Has anyone ever tried to change a copy of a comuter copy of a picture or a scanned document. It is impossible.

Leave a Reply