Taitz v Astrue Reply to opposition by the U.S. Attorneys’ office
Posted on | August 3, 2011 | 2 Comments
Taitz v Astrue Reply to opposition by the U.S. Attorneys' office
Category:
Comments
2 Responses to “Taitz v Astrue Reply to opposition by the U.S. Attorneys’ office”
Leave a Reply
-
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — Indiana Trial of Obama, 2nd Copy
Evidence on Barack Obama
Obama File with Exhibits
Affidavit of Paul Irey
Obama file Exhibits 1 - 7
Obama file Exhibit 8 - Part 1
Obama file Exhibit 8 - Part 2
Obama file Exhibits 9-13
Obama file Exhibits 14-21
Request for Docs under FOIA and Emergency Motion for Reconsideration
Exhibits sent to Inspector Generals and CongressPetition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
URGENT! PLEASE SIGN PETITION TO CONGRESS
OrlyTaitzEsq.com
TAITZ REPORT
Subscribe today to stay in touch with our progress. Send this channel out to your email lists. Thank you for your support. CHANNEL (Google Plus) SUBSCRIBE TO YOUTUBE Official Facebook
Recent Posts
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available! DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling. --------- To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
Pages
- #409755 (no title)
- …Defendant Obama defaulted in Grinols et al v Obama et al
- …Grinols Subpoenas
- ..Grinols Order, Summons, TRO, Complaint
- .Affidavit of Mike Zullo
- 1. Judd v Obama
- 2. Farrar v Obama
- 3. Taitz v Sebelius
- 4. Taitz v Indiana, IN Judge Orders Trial
- 5. Taitz v Astrue
- 6. Mississippi Filed Complaint Update
- 7. Taitz Walters v Sec of State Kansas
- Videos
- Video: Orly before NH Election Committee
August 3rd, 2011 @ 1:19 pm
They state that there would be no Public Interest, HELLOOOOOO, isn’t this what its all about. Obama has been using a SS# that is illegal, and that was not assign to him…their arguments are unrelated to the issue…Obamas SS # has been public for many months, so there is no privacy issue…You are dealing with US Justice Department that has been alleged to be corrupt..Judge Lamberth will make the right decision, if he is honest, which I think he is. God Bless
August 5th, 2011 @ 9:07 pm
This is just getting BIGGER and BIGGER, and the day WILL come when our Congress and our Federal Court System—and Supreme Court—WILL NOT be able to “HIDE” this anymore! If they do, it will be to their own career peril! Even Supreme Court Justices can be “impeached”! For the DOJ to say there is
“no public interest” is nothing but ANOTHER LIE—and the DOJ knows that! This entire Presidency and his “appointees” has been NOTHING MORE THAN ONE, BIG FARCE.