9th Ciscuit Court of Appeals gives Obama an extra month to answer to my Appeal
Posted on | September 10, 2010 | 6 Comments
09-56827 Wiley Drake, et al v. Barack Obama, et al “Clerk Order Filed”
InboxX
Reply |ca9_ecfnoticing@ca9.uscourts.gov to me
show details 12:26 PM (1 hour ago)
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Notice of Docket Activity
The following transaction was entered on 09/10/2010 at 12:26:21 PM PDT and filed on 09/10/2010
Case Name:Wiley Drake, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
Case Number: 09-56827
Document(s):Document(s)
Docket Text:
Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk:LKK): Appellees’ motion for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The answering brief is due October 13, 2010. The optional reply brief is due within 14 days after service of the answering brief. [7469748] [09-56827, 10-55084] (BJB)
The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
Document Description: Main Document
Original Filename: 09-56827.pdf
Electronic Document Stamp:
[STAMP acecfStamp_ID=1106763461 [Date=09/10/2010] [FileNumber=7469748-0] [59d1676b47d32c1739c9fc21cdf6e6606051f16c09694f05c03d200c1575b1bdc5a3274b0f2d87a38d10eba925cca443048cae7df0e0039f70b677ffa762efc7]]
Notice will be electronically mailed to:
DeJute, David A., Assistant U.S. Attorney
Kreep, Gary G.
Doctor Taitz, Orly, Counsel
Tucker, Christopher
Mr. West, Roger E., Supervisory Attorney
Comments
6 Responses to “9th Ciscuit Court of Appeals gives Obama an extra month to answer to my Appeal”
Leave a Reply
September 10th, 2010 @ 3:22 pm
from a current THEPOSTEMAIL article titled:
“Treason charge against Obama has never been answered”
—-
From a retired military commander:
* In order for a court martial or any other military hearing to take place, the convening authority must show that it is a legal assembly.
* Punishment power is derived only from the Commander-in-Chief
* Admirals and Generals receive their convening authority from the Commander-in-Chief
* The U.S. Constitution is the law of the land, not an arbitrary ruling by a career military politician taking orders from a usurper to the office of President
* Lt. Col. Lakin’s defense must demand proof that Obama meets the constitutional qualifications to serve before any hearing can take place
* Absent a legitimate Commander-in-Chief, there is no authority to convene the court martial
* The criminal complaint filed against Obama 18 months ago has never been answered
* The military takeover of the U.S. must be stopped and the perpetrators tried for treason.
One congressional candidate stated that there could be as many as 10,000 people within the government deserving of jail time, and “probably 100 should be facing capital punishment.”
September 10th, 2010 @ 7:51 pm
The 9th Circus lives up to that title again, and again!
September 11th, 2010 @ 2:13 am
Treason has no Honor!
September 11th, 2010 @ 4:34 am
I personally feel the only reason they are giving them more time is so they can dig up some dirt on the Judges to use against them. just my two cents.
September 11th, 2010 @ 7:33 am
:”obama is the reason for all the tresson” copyright alex j rynkiewicz
September 11th, 2010 @ 7:34 am
:”obama is the reason for all the treason” copyright alex j rynkiewicz