No ruling in ‘birther’ challenge

Missives from the land of the birthers

Brian Kemp to Barack Obama’s attorney: Skip ballot hearing ‘at your own peril’

Democrats to boycott effort to remove Barack Obama from Georgia ballot

Ga. Official Predicts “Peril” For Obama If He Spurns Birther Hearing

Obama to continue campaign, ignore subpoena on Thursday

Obama ignores “Order to Appear”

Who is presidential candidate Dr. Laurie Roth, and why is she suing Obama?

Judge considers whether to keep President Barack Obama on Georgia ballot; Orly …

50 Responses to “I presented my case and gave interviews to all the major networks: CBS, NBC, ABC and so on. 6 witnesses testified to Obama’s use of a forged BS and a stolen SSN”

1. Citizens 4 Freedom
   January 26th, 2012 @ 10:26 am

   Georgia court told Obama slam-dunk disqualified…

   …

2. louis gonzales
   January 26th, 2012 @ 10:28 am

   Interesting points to be made:
   – there has not been a single “thorough” case litigated on [any] of the evidence!
   – in the amount of effort/energy/resources obama has discharged in blocking access to any original records (e.g. birth, university academics, writings, et al), he could’ve opened his – allegedly extraordinary – academic achievements (he must be humble) and birth records (NOT forged copies of what purports to be original), and this kind of circus activity would cease to ensue; yet he chooses to deny basic documentation that any upright president would
   – if you don’t have anything to hide, WHY YOU HIDING?

   there are two key issues at hand, both relating to his eligibility:
   1) was he actually born in Hawaii? The SORRY excuses of [documents] he has put forth, are left suspect by any basic rational view. Let’s let the authorities examine and judge; rather than accept this new age “it’s been tweeted and blogged …” RUBBISH, that liberals have come to assert without basis as valid vetting

   2) did the framers of the Constitution leave for a parent of dual citizens to be included as definition of “natural born citizen”?

   These are the two fundamental issues of which, to date, NO courtroom has examined, despite the MSM’s effort (Foxnews included) to dictate otherwise.

   To state otherwise, is disingenuous and dishonest.

3. Bloodless Coup
   January 26th, 2012 @ 10:31 am

   Now What?

   Is the Judge simply going to neglect to issue a ruling?

   A default judgement against Obama for failing to appear should be no brainer.

   What gives?

4. Ben Cooley
   January 26th, 2012 @ 10:43 am

   Reports coming from insiders that Judge Malihi is going to rule DEFAULT against Obama and he will not be allowed on the Georgia Ballot!

5. Ben Cooley
   January 26th, 2012 @ 10:45 am

   This also opens a new chapter. If Obama tries to campaign in Georgia, can he not be arrested for failure to appear?

6. Nancy
   January 26th, 2012 @ 10:48 am

   Orly we are not interested in reading articles. What do you think happened? Who won this case? You or Obama? Apparently my lord Obama won. You are incompetent Orly.

7. ROGER
   January 26th, 2012 @ 11:06 am

   WHY CAN’T THE JUDGE DO TO OBAMA WHAT HE WOULD TO ANY OTHER PERSON LIKE YOU OR I FOR NOT APPEARING IN COURT AND IGNORING HIS ORDER TO APPEAR IN COURT WITH ALL DOCUMENTATION …ISSUE A BENCH WARRANT FOR HIS ARREST?

8. TM
   January 26th, 2012 @ 11:08 am

   Orly explain what will happen next, please. We don’t understand what’s happening.

9. Jo Anne Moretti
   January 26th, 2012 @ 11:10 am

   CONGRATULATIONS! I am so proud of you.

10. martin
    January 26th, 2012 @ 11:17 am

    I watched the case via live web broadcast,Orly you need help,you probably won’t like to hear it but you need help.Your presentation in the court needs polishing,you also need to work on dropping the word ummmm in your delivery,you use all to often when seeking proper information.You need more confidence and you also appear to be scattered in your thought processes.Furthermore,you leave to many loose ends to create doubt in your presentation.Perhaps it is financial strains which impede your ability to think out each piece of your presentation and the stress of running to professional practices,I don’t know,however whatever may be causing your scattered approach to the court it needs to faced and corrected.When you turned your to face the court room attendents and the judge ordered you to address the court I groaned.as soon as you turned to speak to the people instead of the judge is when I groaned,not when he rebuked you a moment later.
    You need to embrace the judge as a reasonable human being he can be your greatest friend.Try to be more personable in that seek to comprehend his or her personal preferences and demands and adhere to them.
    Two more points,one I know it stings to be chastized,but I will tell you this,an enemy comes flattering with their lips and multiplying their kisses but a friend comes with a rebuke,so my final encouragement to you is this,seek out a speech therapist and learn to pronounce the english language with clear diction as well as to learn to pronounce and use nuances of tones to accent your thoughts,they have great influence on your listener,to be honest with you Orly it is difficult and often impossible to understand what you are saying.I think confidence is the issue in your haphazard delivery and the use of ummmmm way to often in your delivery of content.YOu can consciously eleiminate it from your vocabulary and also a speech therapist will help you lose your accent and give you power to present the English language with clarity,as of now dear it is impossible to follow your thoughts without a constant knowledge it requires much work and as I said way to often your points are lost because to many words are not understood.
    Be safe dear,I have been with you and supported you from the beginning,and have as you suffered much verbal abuse in the process.
    Now Sis follow my rebuke,and do so for the sake of our liberty and freedom,start with speech therapy.If I were near enough to you I would volunteer my time,we could do it over the phone if you would like,all conversation will be kept in complete confidentialality.
    Take care dear patriot.

11. Larry
    January 26th, 2012 @ 11:22 am

    WELL WELL We see that the “KING OBAMA” doesn’t HAVE to ABIDE BY ANY LAWS OF THE LAND HE IS DICTATOR OF…only the little surfs are bound by the laws and courts ….I forsee the king just assassinating ANY opponents in the upcoming elections…IF HE SEES FIT TO HAVE THE ELECTION AT ALL.

12. Brady
    January 26th, 2012 @ 11:30 am

    Thank you and well done! This is a proud day for those of us who demand the truth over subterfuge. Your efforts will, no doubt, go down in history!

13. JPotter
    January 26th, 2012 @ 11:38 am

    Obama is using a forged ‘BS’?

14. Linda Steaveson
    January 26th, 2012 @ 11:49 am

    Makes me sick when people continue to use the Constitution as their personal toilet paper.

15. TM
    January 26th, 2012 @ 12:13 pm

    I think Obama will remain on the ballot. The judge refused to give a ruling. Obama wins.

16. Leah Lax
    January 26th, 2012 @ 12:17 pm

    Yeah That God !!!

17. Docforester
    January 26th, 2012 @ 12:19 pm

    So pretty much what happened was that your so-called victory was just a flash in the pan.

18. Gaye Shyne
    January 26th, 2012 @ 12:29 pm

    God Bless you , Ms. Taitz!

    Stay strong…..there are thousands of us behind you. You are a shining example of what a true American really is.

    Gaye Shyne
    guardianforce2728@gmail.com

19. kw
    January 26th, 2012 @ 12:29 pm

    So, if I were to boycott a subpoena to appear in court and refuse to appear, what would be the risk to me, the ordinary person that I am?

20. Scott Hardie
    January 26th, 2012 @ 12:31 pm

    I am so glad that people are looking at this. Something needs to be done to see that we the citizens of this country elect people who are eligible to run for public office. This man was never really VETTED. After the posted birth certificate was found to have problems….it’s the peoples right to verify it’s legitimacy. The natural born aspect of the case has been determined by his own admission. His father was not natural born. Therefor he can’t run as president.

21. garth
    January 26th, 2012 @ 12:40 pm

    Thousands of us in california, got up early and
    had the live coverage on our computers,6:00 A.M. Way to go Orly Taitz! Lost coverage as the band width became to wide from the broadcasters, so we missed the last hour or so. But that was ok, as what we saw was presented to the judge in a great, straight forward manner. Happily moving on and waiting
    joyously for the next outcome!

22. Michael
    January 26th, 2012 @ 1:16 pm

    Hello Orly,

    If one day you have to show that Obama is dishonest, here is a point that might be useful.
    Obama was confronted with the definition of what a “natural born citizen” is when he directly participated in the investigation of John McCain’s eligibility to run for the Presidency of the USA. Obama then signed Senate Resolution 511 from April 30, 2008 that reveals the indispensable requirement of having two US citizen parents in order to be a “natural born citizen” according to the Constitution of the USA and therefore to be eligible to run for the Presidency of the USA or to be President of the USA!!!!!
    Therefore, once again, Obama knew very well that he FRAUDULENTLY decided to run for the Presidency of the USA despite the fact that he knew perfectly well that he was NOT a natural born citizen and therefore that he was not entitled, according to the Constitution of the USA, to be President of the USA.

    Keep the good work, Orly.
    You have probably won soon (with Judge Malihi’s coming decision) a battle BUT get ready to win the war!!!

    NEVER EVER GIVE UP, ORLY, UNTIL OBAMA THE DECEIVER IS FULLY UNCOVERED FOR ALL TO SEE!!
    Obama has already bankrupted the USA. It is time to move on!!!

23. Cody Robert Judy
    January 26th, 2012 @ 1:18 pm

    You did a great job Orly in being concise and efficient with as much material as you had. You looked confident and in control of your presentation in front of the Judge and over tall did a superb job.
    Your presentation did not sweep under the carpet the fraud and forgery of this whole mess while the other attorneys in essence had no moral problem with it as it concerns the manner in which Obama is not eligible I think it is definitely tied together and yours was the best.
    It would be much harder for the Judge to reach completely over the facts of expert witnesses regarding the manner of fraud and forgery of the ineligibility than on the eligibility alone.
    In essence evidence of crimes presented in court is misprision of felony for a Judge not to consider and recommend investigations of.

    Cody Robert Judy
    http://www.codyjudy.us
    http://www.codyjudy.blogspot.cm
    YouTube: CODE4PRES

24. George
    January 26th, 2012 @ 1:21 pm

    You were perfect and professional today, as usual. Now Dr. Taitz, don’t get lured into the illegal regime’s intended distractions that would have you focus on just keeping him off the ballot. Instead, go far beyond that and grab for the brass ring. Use the testimony on this official record to encourage criminal charges to be filed by all appropriate law enforcement in every available jurisdiction. Use Misprision of Felony to make it happen. Law enforcement can no longer turn a blind eye because there are now credible, expert witnesses on the court record stating that numerous, serious crimes have likely been committed and that there is extremely strong and undeniable evidence to support the facts. A grand jury could now move effectively with this. Use every press opportunity to state that these experts have testified Obama has likely broken the law and needs to be criminally investigated by every state before his name can be added to their ballots. Otherwise they become complicit in facilitating further crimes that they are now adequately aware of instead of simply being uninformed accessories after the fact to the crimes he has already likely committed. Notify every SOS in writing by certified mail and include the transcript copy. Thank you for your service to our still great country.

25. Barri Park
    January 26th, 2012 @ 1:31 pm

    Thanks from a fellow citizen .

26. JUDITH BAILEY
    January 26th, 2012 @ 1:52 pm

    DR. ORLY, I HOPE YOU ARE RIGHT ABOUT THIS JUDGE. I HAVE A BAD FEELING THAT HE IS GOING TO ALLOW BO ON THE BALLOTT. I SURE HOPE MY FEELING ARE WRONG. I WILL BE FOLLOWING THIS.

27. Clark Hamblin
    January 26th, 2012 @ 2:45 pm

    I saw, and I say well done, Orly. Carl Swenssen is saying you are “theatrical” at best. He is a glory seeker.

28. WSB-TV Atlanta/The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
    January 26th, 2012 @ 2:49 pm

    Birther hearing held against President Obama
    https://www.wsbtv.com/videos/news/birther-hearing-held-against-president-obama/vFs2S/

    No Obama in court, no ‘birther’ ruling
    https://www.ajc.com/news/georgia-government/no-obama-in-court-1318908.html

29. wwwhoaxofthecenturycom
    January 26th, 2012 @ 2:59 pm

    Three Cheers for America and Orly. A default judgment is a win. When a defendent doesn’t show up for a court hearing the judge automatically enters a Default Judgment for the side that showed up. States are responsible for elections.

    The media is saying no ruling.The ruling is Obama doesn’t meet the qualifications for the Georgia ballot.

    This is a state court. Looks like the Federal Courts are fixed against America.

    The US attorney general has the duty to challenge Obama’s fraud in a criminal court.

30. Starla
    January 26th, 2012 @ 3:32 pm

    “WILL OBAMA SHOW UP AT ELIGIBILITY HEARING?”

    “JUDGE WANTS PRESIDENT IN ATLANTA COURTROOM”

    By Bob Unruh
    WND.com
    January 25, 2012

    Excerpt:

    “It is STATES, usually through the OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF STATE, THAT RUN ELECTIONS, NOT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. The national election is simply a compilation of the results of the INDIVIDUAL ELECTIONS WITHIN STATES.

    The schedule for the hearings was set by Malihi of the Georgia state Office of State Administrative Hearings. In Georgia, STATE LAW REQUIRES “every candidate for federal” office who is certified by the state executive committees of a political party or who files a notice of candidacy “shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.”

    STATE LAW also grants the secretary of state and any “elector who is eligible to vote for a candidate” in the state the authority to raise a challenge to a candidate’s qualifications, the judge determined.” (emphasis is mine.)

    Read The Entire Article Here:
    https://www.wnd.com/2012/01/obama-to-miss-eligibility-hearing/

    * * * *

    A Comment Under This Article:

    “amanda said:

    “More important than where he was born…. his school enrollment in Indonesia stating him to be an Indonesia citizen…. so, since he was made Indonesian so he could be enrolled in school, he is an Indonesia citizen…. I’ve seen nothing about him being naturalized on returning to Hawaii, but even if he were, he’s still not eligible to hold office. We DO need him to be forced from office so we don’t have to pay him $400,000.00 a year for the rest of his life……..”

    * * * *

31. Ken B.
    January 26th, 2012 @ 3:42 pm

    You did GREAT, Orly.

    I’ve noticed that it always seems that the judges are rushing you, they are not patient the least bit.

32. Joseph Zernik, PhD, Human Rights Alert (NGO)
    January 26th, 2012 @ 4:12 pm

    A Settlement for Obama…
    ____
    The authenticity, or lack thereof, of the digital record that was produced by the White House as Obama’s long form birth certificate is not likely to be settled by the US courts anytime soon. It would be like cold turkey quitting the fraud in electronic records in the courts, in banking, and in government agencies. The President himself supports a mega fraud settlement for the banks. Why not the same for him too?
    _____
    Los Angeles, January 24 – “The authenticity, or lack thereof, in the digital record that was produced by the White House as Obama’s long form birth certificate is not likely to be settled by the US courts anytime soon,” predicts Joseph Zernik, PhD, from Human Rights Alert (NGO).

    The main reason: any discussion of the matter, immediately brings up the question of what is a valid, legally admissible digital record in the United States.

    However, the US electronic record systems of the past 2-3 decades are fraught with fraud. Fraud has been repeatedly shown in the electronic record systems in:
    State and US courts
    Prisons
    Banks
    Mortgage registration
    Land ownership registration
    Banking and exchange regulating agencies
    Voting machines
    Supreme Court of the United States.
    If the US District Court in Georgia decides that the president is not permitted to admit false and deliberately misleading, digitally-generated records in court, then the People may later demand that the same standard be applied to the banks, or even the courts…

    The President himself is a staunch supporter of a mega fraud settlement for the banks. Why not the same for the President too?

33. OBEY THE RULES OF LAW IN THE USA CONSTITUTION, & THE BILL OF RIGHTS IN THE USA WITHOUT FAILURE
    January 26th, 2012 @ 4:29 pm

    MUST READ OUTSTANDING ARTICLES!!

    “KENYAN PARLIAMENT CLAIMS OBAMA BORN IN KENYA”

    “SO WHERE IS THE UNITED STATES MILITARY?”

    By Sharon Rondeau
    ThePostEmail.com
    April 11, 2010

    Excerpt:

    “(Apr. 11, 2010) — A member of the Kenyan Parliament has stated in a meeting of that body on March 25, 2010 that Barack Obama was born in Kenya.

    The statement, which discussed the concept of “devolution,” or ethnic inclusion, reads: “If America was living in a situation where they feared ethnicity and did not see itself as a multiparty state or nation, how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the President of America?” A screenshot of page 31 of the Minutes where the statement appears is below.”

    See The Entire Article & Links Here: https://www.thepostemail.com/2010/04/11/kenyan-parliament-claims-obama-born-in-kenya/
    * * * *

    “KENYAN PARLIAMENT PROCLAIMED OBAMA’S BIRTH THERE IN NOVEMBER 2008”

    “REPEATED REFERENCES TO OBAMA’S PURPORTED ORIGINS IN “OFFICIAL” DOCUMENTS, AS WELL AS KNOWLEDGE OF “ILLEGAL” ACTIVITY”

    Submitted by Terry R. Wiley
    ThePostEmail.com
    April 14, 2010

    “Kenya gained its independence from Great Britain in 1963 but was a de facto one-party nation from 1969 to 1982”

    Excerpt:

    “(Apr. 14, 2010) — While the March 25, 2010 Kenyan Parliament meeting Minutes, or Hansard, stated unequivocally that Barack Hussein Obama was born in that country, the topic had also been mentioned repeatedly at the Parliament session held one day after the U.S. presidential election.

    The following excerpts are from the Minutes of November 5, 2008, all containing references to Obama’s relationship to Kenya as expressed by members of the Parliament and entered into the official record. Items in bold were added by The Post & Email for emphasis.”

    See The Entire Article & Links Here:
    https://www.thepostemail.com/2010/04/14/kenyan-parliament-proclaimed-obamas-birth-there-in-november-2008/

    * * * *

34. RoBoTech
    January 26th, 2012 @ 4:44 pm

    Atlantic Journal says “Roughly 100 people are in the courtroom, most of them older white Americans.”

    And WHY is that so important to the reporter that a distiction had to be made?
    Not ONLY was it a racist remark, but also had Ageism overtones.
    Too bad for that “reporter” that there are more pf us “older white folk” in America than any TWO other races, combined.
    But, I guess that makes us the minority in the Atlanta Journal’s eyes.
    Unbelievable.
    And this is what Black Liberals can get away with, that a White Conservative man would be excoriated over.
    What a RACIST rag!

35. Maggie
    January 26th, 2012 @ 4:56 pm

    Thank you Orly you are truly fighting for the “REGULAR CITIZEN”. I have felt in my core the DNC has know all along Obama is ineligible and I uncover the proof that one of my senator was trying to change the Natural Citizen portion of the US Constitution in 2008. I am sending you a copy of the article.

    In February of 2008 Obama and Clair McCaskill tried to change the constitution to legitimize Obama for presidency, later used Gestapo technic

    In this article, originally posted in the blog of the same name, “Zapem” breaks a report of the history of sidestepping, skirting, and attempted Constitutional tinkering on behalf of unnatural born Citizen, John McCain — thereby, an attempt to pave the way for Barack Obama.

    by Zapem

    If one were to look at the activity on Capital Hill during the campaign, there would be no question in their minds that both McCain and Obama were sweating the “natural born citizen” issue. How do we arrive at that conclusion? We take McCain’s ingrained, glib advice and “Look at the record, my friends“. Doing just that, we find that back on February 28, 2008, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) introduced a bill to the Senate for consideration. That bill was known as S. 2678: Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act. The bill was co-sponsored by Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL), Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY), Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ), and Sen. Thomas Coburn (R-OK). Bill S. 2678 attempted to change article II, section 1, clause 5 of the Constitution of the United States with reference to the requirements of being a “natural born citizen” and hence; the entitlement to run for President of the United States. This bill met the same fate that similar attempts to change the Constitution have in the past. Attempts such as The Natural Born Citizen Act were known to have failed and the text scrubbed from the internet, with only a shadow-cached copy left, that only the most curious public can find.

    Sen. McCaskill, her co-sponsors, fellow colleagues and legal counsel, contend that the Constitution is ambiguous in article II, section 1 and requires clarification. But does it? According to the framers and such drafters as John Bingham, we find the definition to be quite clear:

    I find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen… . . – John Bingham in the United States House on March 9, 1866

    From the days of James Madison to the present, the courts have held that the amendment process be justiciable in accordance with its constitutionality and not self-serving or political. But is that what happened here? Again, we must go to the record. Within only five short weeks after Senate Bill 2678 faded from the floor, we find Sen. Claire McCaskill back again, making another attempt with Senate Resolution 511. On April 10, 2008, she introduced a secondary proposal in the form of a non-binding resolution, recognizing John McCain as a “natural born citizen” in defiance of the Constitution. Curiously, it contained the same identical co-sponsors, Barack Obama and Hillary.

36. Maggie
    January 26th, 2012 @ 5:01 pm

    Thank you Orly you are truly fighting for the “REGULAR CITIZEN”. I have felt in my core the DNC has know all along Obama is ineligible and I uncover the proof that one of my senator was trying to change the Natural Citizen portion of the US Constitution in 2008. I am sending you a copy of the article.

    Thank you Orly you are truly fighting for the “REGULAR CITIZEN”. I have felt in my core the DNC has know all along Obama is ineligible and I uncover the proof that one of my senator was trying to change the Natural Citizen portion of the US Constitution in 2008. I am sending you a copy of the article. Also,I am filing a complaint in Missouri.

    If one were to look at the activity on Capital Hill during the campaign, there would be no question in their minds that both McCain and Obama were sweating the “natural born citizen” issue. How do we arrive at that conclusion? We take McCain’s ingrained, glib advice and “Look at the record, my friends.” Doing just that, we find that back on February 28, 2008, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) introduced a bill to the Senate for consideration. That bill was known as S. 2678: Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act. The bill was co-sponsored by Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL), Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY), Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ) and Sen. Thomas Coburn (R-OK). Bill S. 2678 attempted to change article II, section 1, clause 5 of the Constitution of the United States with reference to the requirements of being a “natural born citizen” and hence; the entitlement to run for President of the United States. This bill met the same fate that similar attempts to change the Constitution have in the past. Attempts such as The Natural Born Citizen Act were known to have failed and the text scrubbed from the Internet, with only a shadow-cached copy left, that only the most curious public can find.
    Sen. McCaskill, her co-sponsors, fellow colleagues and legal counsel, contend that the Constitution is ambiguous in article II, section 1 and requires clarification. But does it? According to the framers and such drafters as John Bingham, we find the definition to be quite clear:
    I find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen… . . – John Bingham in the United States House on March 9, 1866
    From the days of James Madison to the present, the courts have held that the amendment process be justifiable in accordance with its constitutionality and not self-serving or political. But is that what happened here? Again, we must go to the record. Within only five short weeks after Senate Bill 2678 faded from the floor, we find Sen. Claire McCaskill back again, making another attempt with Senate Resolution 511. On April 10, 2008, she introduced a secondary proposal in the form of a non-binding resolution, recognizing John McCain as a “natural born citizen” in defiance of the Constitution. Curiously, it contained the same identical co-sponsors, Barack Obama and Hillary

    Clinton.ABCNews.com reported:

    “With questions – however serious – about whether Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., is eligible to run for president since he was born outside U.S. borders on an American Naval base, Sens. Patrick Leahy, D-Vermont, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo. today introduced a non-binding resolution expressing the sense of the U.S. Senate that McCain qualifies as a “natural born Citizen,” as specified in the Constitution and eligible for the highest office in the land. Co-sponsors include Sens. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, and Barack Obama, D-Illinois; Leahy said he anticipates it will pass unanimously.”
    One has to wonder — what dire urgency could there possibly have been in persisting with trying to legislate a candidate into being a “natural born citizen”? Certainly providing a birth certificate and reading the Constitution would be more than sufficient. Why did these candidates and their wishful nominees go to such lengths in the Senate when obviously, they had more pressing matters to attend to? And why were there two Senators co-sponsoring such an issue, twice, who were in direct competition with John McCain in the 2008 election? One answer is that looking at John McCain’s long-form birth certificate reveals he was not a natural born citizen and Barack Obama hasn’t submitted his long-form at all. John McCain was born in an “unincorporated territory,” held by the courts to be not part of the United States for constitutional purposes. Barack Obama has submitted only a Certification of Live Birth, but Hawaii law will certify a live birth using that document for births that occurred even outside of the country. Furthermore, Barack Obama’s father was Kenyan and never an American citizen. Since the status of citizenship occurs at birth, this makes Barack Obama a citizen if born in Hawaii, but not a natural born citizen. One must have two citizen parents, at the time of birth, and be born on U.S. soil, to be deemed a natural born citizen and be declared eligible for the presidency. The Senate, for all their trouble, cannot legislate a person’s born status. It happens at birth, according to the law. While Senate Bill 2678 fell to the wayside, Senate Resolution 511 was passed on April 30, 2008 as a non-binding resolution. However, S.R. 511 is not a law, but rather, a unanimous opinion. Technically, it means absolutely nothing what they’ve written as it’s not a law, nor did the matter reach the House for review. It’s a stepping-stone in the larger scheme of things that haven’t happened yet; the push to change our Constitution. World Net Daily reported on November 13, 2008:
    More than a half-dozen legal challenges have been filed in federal and state courts demanding President-elect Barack Obama’s decertification from ballots or seeking to halt elector meetings, claiming he has failed to prove his U.S. citizenship status. An Obama campaign spokeswoman told WND the complaints are unfounded. “All I can tell you is that it is just pure garbage,” she said. “There have been several lawsuits, but they have been dismissed.”
    Perhaps someone should have informed Obama’s spokeswoman that many of these cases have not been dismissed at all, rather they are mounting, and her statements are in fact, pure “garbage”. Then perhaps someone may prompt an answer from the Obama spokespeople as to why they were entertaining the thought of fiddling with the United States Constitution back in February and April of THIS YEAR? Perhaps because it was in the best interest of Sen. Obama. Then what of Sen. Claire McCaskill? What possible interest could she have had in these proceedings and leading the charge with her proposals? Was it a bona fide Constitutional issue of judicial importance, or rather a political one? Digging further into the record we find that according to Wikki and subsequent footnotes therein:
    “In January 2008, Claire McCaskill decided to endorse Senator Barack Obama in his campaign for the Democratic nomination for the presidential elections of 2008, making her one of the first senators to do so. She has been one of the most visible faces for his campaign. [14] McCaskill support was crucial to Obama’s narrow victory in the Missouri primary in February 2008. She had been frequently mentioned as a possible vice presidential choice of Senator Obama in the 2008 run for the White House…”
    So what we see is a definite political motive being dragged into the Senate for the purposes of legitimizing the 2008 candidates. But if these candidates were legitimate already, there would obviously be no reason for these proceedings. So political was the motive of McCaskill, even Missouri’s Governor, Matt Blunt revealed that Sen. McCaskill was involved in the “abusive use of Missouri Law Enforcement.” This was dubbed as the “Truth Squad” during the election campaign by the media. The Truth Squad was comprised of Missouri officials and attorneys who set up shop on the streets of Missouri and threatened the public with criminal penalties and lawsuits if they engaged in critical speech against Sen. Obama. The Obama campaign also issued cease and desist letters to media station managers who carried advertisers who were unfriendly towards Barack Obama, namely, the NRA. Citizen outrage prompted this response from Governor Blunt:
    “Obama and the leader of his Missouri campaign Senator Claire McCaskill have attached the stench of police state tactics to the Obama-Biden campaign. What Senator Obama and his helpers are doing is scandalous beyond words, the party that claims to be the party of Thomas Jefferson is abusing the justice system and offices of public trust to silence political criticism with threats of prosecution and criminal punishment.”
    Considering these facts and the judicial record, there is every reason to believe that Sen. McCaskill had no interest in resolving Sen. McCain’s eligibility, but Sen. Obama’s long-term. She manipulated the Senate and then threatened the media and the public thereafter, politically motivated at the prospect of becoming Obama’s Vice-Presidential pick. But it didn’t stop there. Chairman Patrick J. Leahy entered into the Senate record a legal analysis of two high-powered attorneys hired by Sen. McCain – Theodore Olson and Laurence Tribe – both of whom are extremely politically active and biased, and attached that opinion to S.R. 511. So controversial was that legal opinion, that it prompted a rebuttal by Professor Gabriel J. Chin of The University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law, in a discussion paper #08-14 entitled, Why Senator John McCain Cannot Be President.
    Professor Chin points out clearly where Tribe-Olson sought to draw out implied theories in the law, which in reality, are simply not there and in fact have been decided by the courts already, in opposition to the suggestions offered by Tribe-Olson. Simply put, the attorneys hired by Sen. McCain attempt to fit the law into their agenda with contrived implications. Professor Chin brings the law back into focus, requiring no implied theories. Legalities aside, in anticipation of the feared “Fairness Doctrine”, the whole of the main stream media has since acquiesced to the intimidation tactics of the Obama campaign and paraded the non-binding resolution known as S.R. 511 to the public with unfactual foolishness. S.R. 511 is neither a constitutional amendment nor legally binding in any way. Yet the media caved to political pressure and reported it to the public as Chairman Leahy dictated, giving the illusion to the pubic that said resolution was binding to the 2008 election. Nothing could be farther from the truth. The public responded, initially by way of lawsuits contesting the eligibility of not only John McCain, but Barack Obama and Roger Calero as well, citing them all, with equal disqualifying merit, as being constitutionally ineligible to run for President of the United States. Later, netizens of the Internet caught wind of the court actions and responded with their own explosion of blogs, forums, websites, chat rooms, emails, etc. In an attempt to quell the discord, the mainstream media offered personalities such as Thomas Goldstein, which only served to infuriate the public further. The public saw such maneuvers as deceitful and an attempt to embarrass the now educated public. However, the greater proof is in the activity, which originated in the Senate in early 2008, which was hidden from the public that sought to change what our representatives knew to be unconstitutional from the start. The public really needs to look no further than this activity, for it speaks to the heart of the deals that went on beyond the Senate doors. Rather than trust the preservation model our founding forefathers wrote into our Constitution, these representatives, beholden of the public trust, saw fit to manipulate the clauses contained therein, for the sole benefit of their own political self-interests. Perhaps our representatives, the United States Supreme Court and the mainstream media would be interested in reflecting on these records and then start answering truthfully the questions, which have so far been ignored. The public has been promised transparency, but to date has only been dealt scoffing, deceitful rhetoric, if they choose to address it at all. While the public has been patient and enduring, the questions remain and refuse to be dismissed. We expect them to be answered, preferably prior to January 20, 2009. We the people deserve an answer! ____________________________________________________
    Listing of 9 articles from the 110th Congress as entered.
    1 . SENATE RESOLUTION 511–RECOGNIZING THAT JOHN SIDNEY MCCAIN III, IS A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN — Senate – April 10, 2008
    2 . REPORTS OF COMMITTEES — Senate – April 24, 2008
    3 . SUBMISSION OF CONCURRENT AND SENATE RESOLUTIONS — Senate – April 10, 2008
    4 . JOHN S. McCain, III CITIZENSHIP — Senate – April 30, 2008
    5. MEETINGS SCHEDULED — Extensions of Remarks – April 21, 2008
    6. Daily Digest – Friday, April 18, 2008
    7. Daily Digest – Thursday, April 24, 2008
    8. Daily Digest – Wednesday, April 30, 2008
    9. Daily Digest – Wednesday, April 23, 2008
    Sources:
    https://thomas.loc.gov
    (R: 110)
    ←→Calendar No. 715
    110th CONGRESS
    2d Session
    S. RES. 511
    RESOLUTION
    Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.
    https://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=sr110-511
    https://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=sr110-511
    What should be done?
    As a follow up to the previous (above) article about Clair McCaskill, Obama “truth” squad and people like Secretary of State of Ohio Jennifer Brunner and all the others that have been collaborating with this Gestapo-SS establishment, they all should and would be tried in Nuremberg style trials for harassing, intimidating, blackmailing and terrorizing fellow citizens, for defrauding the whole country. Patriots of this country didn’t fight and defeat Nazi Germany to end up with Obama’s, McCaskill, Soros, Brunner and the rest of this squad. I hope that the men in this country, particularly in our military will finally revolt against this travesty of Justice. If our government and our elected officials and our judiciary have failed us, then it is time for the new government, new elected officials and a new judiciary.

37. John_PUMA
    January 26th, 2012 @ 6:13 pm

    if the judge issues a default and pulls obama off he will appeal to one of his courts the only good thing is he will have been found guilty so now it will up to him to prove innocence or foul play

38. ThePaidTroll
    January 26th, 2012 @ 6:16 pm

    From what I understand the Judge is not going to rule on any of the eligibility arguments but will instead issue a default judgment for failure to appear.

    Sounds like a wink and a nod to Obama to me.

39. 2discern
    January 26th, 2012 @ 6:54 pm

    In response to Maggie above well written comment post, the glaringly obvious corrupt CONgress, already knew and colluded in the 2008 election fraud.

    Nobody has addressed the issue of highly capable agencies like FBI, CIA, NSA, Secret Service (they are not that secret as to whom they protect)who cover for barry soetero. From archives of a deceased truth teller CIA is the operative arm of this present government. Opium protected fields in Afghanistan and all the rest of the military complex. Very few ask the simple questions of why hasn’t the most strategic intel agencies of our Republic vetted their own boss? Correct answer, CIA, FBI etc. is barry soetero’s boss.

    The outcome of today’s hearing (as noble and upright as it is) will be a futile exercise in preserving the already extinct rights of “we the people”. I am so sorry to conclude that. I was present at a meeting with a former DEA agent (during Noriega Contra issue), now a Sheriff, and when asked why the FBI has not responded to the filed legal complaints of barry soetero’s real identity fraud, his response- “that’s a good question”.

    Think folks. Do you really believe all the facts citizens have already dug up in due diligence with the fake SS#, forged BC, manipulated Selective Service registration, no personal witnesses to Columbia University attendance, non-release of past records, etc. are surprises to TPTB? Why has every judge dismissed the cases? Why hasn’t Malihi ruled yet? Why didn’t Hillary spill the beans with full knowledge barry was illegal so she could win? The DAVOS meeting happening right now will determine your next puppet president.

    In our info age, the illusion of a great country, a Republic, a free enterprise system is coming to light, we’ve been had. Yes, it hurts and realities are so crashing hard to endure. We’ve been lied to, manipulated, taxed, and gullible. In our Judeo-Christian ethic foundation we believed people of power were men of their word. They weren’t. They aren’t. The liar-in-chief barry soetero as the epitome of deceit, fraud, and corruption is acting out his part with precision. He has the cover of ALL in power. Both parties, all agencies, all branches of government. You will see. It is sad but true.

40. Edward Osiecki
    January 26th, 2012 @ 8:17 pm

    Thanks Orly for your hard work and persistence in trying so hard to reach the truth. I pray that judge Malihi will honestly review the facts that you have presented and rule accord-ingly, then submit his report to the secretary of state Mr. Kemp who will also honestly review the judges report and keep Obama off the ballot. The facts speak for themselves. It takes only one state to get the ball rolling and to wake up other states. Orly you are my hero.

41. dawngaye
    January 26th, 2012 @ 9:43 pm

    I get disgusted with those of you who dare to come on this site and insult Mrs. Taitz as if she OWES you something! Docforester, TM, Bloodless Coup, and especially NANCY: Where do you get off?? You don’t want to read, you want answers… You paying for Orly’s expenses or her hourly billing rate? Then MAYBE you could talk like that. Maybe Orly is a little tired after the day she’s had?? Go look up the answers yourself. And if you DID read the articles, you might have the answers. And… If you are railing on about nothing happening, Orly “loosing” , thinking BO “won”, then you are ignorant of how these things proceed and you sound like spoiled brats, and dull ones at that. I could give you the info you want, and I was going to but I changed my mind. Figure it out for yourselves and make sure you have the answers before you dare call Ms. Taitz “incompetent”.
    Orly, you were great this morning. I appreciate your passion, your intelligence and your patriotism. Please keep up the good work. And don’t worry about the other attorneys not wanting to combine the cases. It is all working out. Our God has a great plan. Blessings and all Best, dawngaye

42. ken
    January 26th, 2012 @ 10:09 pm

    I read the plantiffs attornies have to file briefings by feb 5th then the judge will make a ruling?

43. Thomas/PatriotofPast
    January 27th, 2012 @ 5:55 am

    Desperate times call for Desperate measures…
    I do hope Judge Malihi does not wake up with a horses head in his bed. Obama is caught, he knows it. The Judges safety should be our number one priority.

44. Stephen T
    January 27th, 2012 @ 6:51 am

    Evidence of crimes committed by Obama have been heard in a courtroom and the news of this has been broadcast across the nation. Every sheriff in the nation has the duty to issue an arrest warrant and take him into custody and hold him for trial in a detention facility.

45. Carl Manning
    January 27th, 2012 @ 9:44 am

    Judge has encouraged Attorneys to submit briefs to the court, and he will submit his ruling on February 5th according to this Atlanta newsclip from WSB, Channel 2 here in Atlanta…

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4clrErlPvd4&feature=player_embedded#!

46. Jade
    January 27th, 2012 @ 9:44 am

    Orly, staff, supporters and comrades, thank you. Good job! But this is, of course, only the beginning, as I believe the people, to include any and all judges who would preside over this matter, are concerned about the repercussions to any such (discrediting) action against Obama.

    His supporters have used the “race” card time and again to intimidate if not completely silence the opposition. There is no doubt but they will do so again, with greater fervor and more dire consequences.

    It’s been said that were President Obama to be charged with these crimes, there would be, at the very least, rioting in the streets throughout this nation. There’s not a court in this land that will not consider that very real possibility.

    Obama and so many within the Democratic Congress have set us back decades by pulling the “race card” whenever any one so dares to questions his policies, motives and actions, and I’ve no doubt that they will use this opportunity to do so again.

    We must stand, and stand strong, hand in hand, people of all colors, races and creeds, now especially to justice well served.

47. Maurice W
    January 27th, 2012 @ 12:49 pm

    WAIT A MINUTE- There is more to this. The Obama Presidency is part of a plan by the ruling oligarchy to discredit the US Goverrnment, the office of the president and the US Consitution .. This is why they installed a illegitimate president.

    Obamas bossses want World Governance. The integrity of the Consitutional Republic must be destroyed first.

48. Kate
    January 27th, 2012 @ 2:21 pm

    For those of you who keep quoting Senate Resolution 511 to use against President Obama, it’s quite obvious you’re not familiar with what it actually says. Please note that it says nothing about anyone other than John McCain.

    S.Res.511 – A resolution recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.
    Version Word Count Changes From Previous Version Percent Change
    Introduced in Senate 316 n/a n/a
    Reported in Senate 379 5 18%
    Agreed to Senate 332 4 Show Changes 20%
    Display Version

    Most commented sections:

    Paragraph 16 (1 comments)

    Rollover any line of text to comment and/or link to it.

    SRES 511
    Calendar No. 715
    ATS

    110th CONGRESS
    2d Session
    S. RES. 511

    Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.

    IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
    April 10, 2008

    Mrs. MCCASKILL (for herself, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. OBAMA, Mr. COBURN, Mrs. CLINTON, and Mr. WEBB) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

    April 24, 2008

    Reported by Mr. LEAHY, without amendment

    April 30, 2008

    Considered and agreed to

    RESOLUTION

    Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.

    Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a `natural born Citizen’ of the United States;

    Whereas the term `natural born Citizen’, as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;

    Whereas there is no evidence of the intention of the Framers or any Congress to limit the constitutional rights of children born to Americans serving in the military nor to prevent those children from serving as their country’s President;

    Whereas such limitations would be inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the `natural born Citizen’ clause of the Constitution of the United States, as evidenced by the First Congress’s own statute defining the term `natural born Citizen’;

    Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is preserved and enhanced by the men and women who are assigned to serve our country outside of our national borders;

    Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President; and

    1
    Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen’ under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.
    110th CONGRESS
    2d Session
    S. RES. 511
    RESOLUTION

49. Morry
    January 27th, 2012 @ 10:04 pm

    A muslim, an illegal alien, and a socialist walked up to the bar. The bartender said “What’ll it be tonight, Mr President?”

50. Wordwaryor
    January 31st, 2012 @ 8:41 am

    The HUGE fallacy in the legislation that “ruled” John McCain to be a “natural born citizen” is Laughable.

    NO body of men or government CAN rule a person to be a natural born citizen. That is established “naturally” by the true circumstances of one’s birth. Citizenship of parents followed by place of birth.

    A person born on U.S. soil to two citizen parents is in ALL Ways a citizen by birth …. and it therefore a “natural born” citizen.

Leave a Reply