“Legal times” write, that Lamberth dismissed the case, but do not discuss any evidence. It has a link to the decision by Lamberth
Posted on | August 30, 2011 | 3 Comments
August 30, 2011
Taitz, who lists a California address, sued the Social Security Administration in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia seeking information on the living holder of a particular social security number. Taitz, in this case and others like it filed in courts across the country, has been attempting to prove that President Barack Obama is not a natural born U.S. citizen and is ineligible for office.
“As her numerous filings with the Court demonstrate, plaintiff will stop at nothing to get to the bottom of this alleged conspiracy,” Lamberth wrote in his opinion (PDF) dismissing the case. “Unfortunately for plaintiff, today is not her lucky day.”
The Social Security Administration had turned over some social security information Taitz had requested for several deceased individuals, but had refused to do the same for individuals who are still alive, citing the statutes that keep social security information private.
Lamberth, in granting the agency summary judgment, found that Taitz had failed to produce any evidence that the social security information was being used improperly by a public official – the president, in this case – and prove a “legitimate public interest” in disclosing the requested information.
Taitz, in an e-mail Tuesday morning, said she is reviewing the decision but expects to file a motion for reconsideration. Citing other lawsuits pending against White House Counsel Kathy Ruemmler and other officials, Taitz said she will continue to pursue “legal actions… for their part in aiding and abetting Obama” in producing “forged documents.”
A Social Security Administration representative did not immediately return a request for comment.
Posted by Zoe Tillman on August 30, 2011 at 12:32 PM in Current Affairs, D.C. Courts and Government, Miscellany, Other Courts, Points of View , Politics and Government, Society and Culture | Permalink
Digg This | Save to del.icio.us
Comments
3 Responses to ““Legal times” write, that Lamberth dismissed the case, but do not discuss any evidence. It has a link to the decision by Lamberth”
Leave a Reply
August 30th, 2011 @ 11:46 am
So does this mean Fuddy does not have to produce the original birth certificate?
August 31st, 2011 @ 6:18 am
I’ll bet this means that Orly Taitz files an appeal.
November 28th, 2011 @ 3:23 am
I suggest adding a facebook like button for the blog!
Helen