02.19.2013 order from the Supreme Court of the United States does not state whether the case was granted or denied, no answer yet, no treason yet by the justices of the Supreme Court. See the order at link below
Posted on | February 19, 2013 | 62 Comments
SCOTUS 02.19.2013 order does not state yet whether the case was granted or denied, no decision yet
Category: Events, HOT ITEMS!, Important Contacts, Latest News, Legal Actions, Obama Fraud Gate, Orly Taitz civil rights leader, Orly Taitz Obama birth certificate, Orly Taitz Obama social Security number, Orly Taitz ObamaFraudGate, Other Criminal or Suspicious Activities, Supporting Documentation
Comments
62 Responses to “02.19.2013 order from the Supreme Court of the United States does not state whether the case was granted or denied, no answer yet, no treason yet by the justices of the Supreme Court. See the order at link below”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
February 19th, 2013 @ 7:53 am
do a docket search at the scotus website. It states the results.
February 19th, 2013 @ 7:54 am
I found this on obamareleaseyourrecords website: 12A606 NOONAN, EDWARD, ET AL. V. BOWEN, CA SEC. OF STATE
The applications for stay addressed to The Chief Justice and referred to the Court are denied. There was no recusal of the usurper appointed justices.
February 19th, 2013 @ 7:56 am
It was denied – see the list at https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/021913zor_19m1.pdf
February 19th, 2013 @ 7:59 am
ORYR is reporting that the Supreme Court has denied…..
February 19th, 2013 @ 8:00 am
I just checked the docket again and it does say that it was denied.
Down at the very bottom it says –
February 19, 2013 Application (12A606) denied by the Court
February 19th, 2013 @ 8:01 am
What are you talking about? It lists two cases, and then says:
“The applications for stay addressed to The Chief Justice and referred to the Court are denied.”
How can it be any clearer?
February 19th, 2013 @ 8:02 am
Even Lyle at SCOTUS blog says that the stay was denied.
https://www.scotusblog.com/2013/02/live-blog-of-orders-and-opinions-sponsored-by-bloomberg-law-11/
February 19th, 2013 @ 8:03 am
If the list given in this link, of all the cases heard by SCOTUS on Februray 15 is correct, what time period could have been seriously assigned to 12A606, to read the brief, look at the evidence, and read all the affitdavits ?
February 19th, 2013 @ 8:07 am
This what Lyle wrote on SCOTUS blog –
9:50
Lyle:
In answer to a question, the Court denied a stay in the case of Noonan v. Bowen (12A606), but did not act on any other aspect of that case.
What does it mean that the did not act on any other aspects of the case? What other aspects of the case remain? Do you think that they will announce today that Obama has been found guilty of fraud?
February 19th, 2013 @ 8:17 am
here’s the Supreme Court order list
https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/021913zor_19m1.pdf
denied
February 19th, 2013 @ 8:25 am
The TWO stays of applications were combined, YOURS was denied
12A606
NOONAN, EDWARD, ET AL. V. BOWEN, CA SEC. OF STATE
12A712
KWASNIK, MAREK A. V. FNMA
The applications for stay addressed to The Chief Justice and
referred to the Court are denied.
February 19th, 2013 @ 8:37 am
docket states: 2-19-2013 – denied 🙁
February 19th, 2013 @ 8:45 am
Orly, the last time I felt like this was in the waiting room the day of my daughter’s birth, 28 years ago…I can only imagine how you feel!!!
WIN! JUST WIN, BABY!
February 19th, 2013 @ 8:50 am
This is huge! It looks like the Supreme Court needs more time to go over all the evidence you submitted. Either that or that Turkish clerk never even showed your file to them. If the case is denied, I would demand to see the signature of every Justice so that you can know who committed treason and who sided with you. I would bet that the ruling will be 5-4 either way.
February 19th, 2013 @ 8:52 am
Is this for real https://politicalvelcraft.org/2013/02/16/orly-taitz-supreme-court-grants-expedited-decision-on-obama-fraud-for-tuesday-february-19-2013/
February 19th, 2013 @ 8:53 am
It was denied effective today.
February 19th, 2013 @ 8:58 am
This is good news, no? If they have not made decision yet, then they are still pondering?
My bet is that you will have decision in hand by end of day, early tomorrow of late, and it will be in favor of you.
You are very important and judges would be stupid not to pay attention to your evidence.
February 19th, 2013 @ 8:58 am
Looks like it has been denied
https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12a606.htm
February 19th, 2013 @ 9:02 am
Feb 19 2013 Application (12A606) denied by the Court.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12a606.htm
February 19th, 2013 @ 9:04 am
“moderation” for the supreme court docket?
February 19th, 2013 @ 9:04 am
According to the SCOTUS’s website it was denied
February 19th, 2013 @ 9:34 am
If the SCOTUS will not hear this case ,is it possible Judge Roy Moore, Alabama ,will look at it ?
February 19th, 2013 @ 9:46 am
“They range from a few million USD to more than a billion USD in the case of John Roberts.”
“Slush fund accounts of major US politicians identified and seized at Vatican Bank (Rome). Connection established with Daniel Dal Bosco RICO indictment, which cites Giancarlo Bruno, Silvio Berlusconi & Ban Ki Moon. On Wednesday 5th January 2011, it emerged that US establishment-related slush fund accounts had been located in, and seized from, the Vatican Bank in Rome. The source of funds for these accounts in almost every instance was found to be the US Treasury. Beneficiaries of the covert Vatican accounts include Barack Obama, Michelle Obama and each of the Obama children, Michelle Obama’s mother, all the Bushes and the Clintons, including Chelsea Clinton, Joe Biden, Timothy Geithner, Janet Napolitano, several US Senators, including Mitch McConnell, several US Congressmen including John Boehner, several US Military Chiefs of Staff, the US Provost Marshal, the US Judge Advocate General, the US Supreme Court Chief Justice, John Roberts, several US Judges, the Pope, and several cardinals. Big money was found in each of the accounts. The longer the beneficiaries have been in office, the greater the account balances were found to be. They range from a few million USD to more than a billion USD in the case of John Roberts. The total number of slush fund accounts so far identified at the Vatican Bank is said to be between 600 and 700. This number is likely to grow as international élite corruption investigations spread worldwide. The disclosures have split the Roman Catholic Legatus organisation down the middle. Elizabeth Windsor (Queen Elizabeth II of England) is in the know and is intimately involved in the swirling and fissiparous covert power plays.”
– Bob Chapman newsletter pg 9 Jan 15,2011
https://seeker401.wordpress.com/2011/01/17/bob-chapman-newsletter-jan-152011-slush-fund-of-top-politicians-found-at-vatican-bank-obama-clinton-roberts-legatus-split/
February 19th, 2013 @ 9:58 am
yup it was by Kennedy but does he have to give a reason why or an explanation of his decision?
February 19th, 2013 @ 9:58 am
Application (12A606) denied by the Court. (02/19/2013).
February 19th, 2013 @ 9:58 am
There are 26 pages of Order for today, including our case 12A606. If all these cases were reviewed on February 15, it seems like an impossibility that these 9 old justices, could have concienciously reviewed case 12A606, that same date.
If left to the clerks, to ascertain the legitimacy of the usurper, we are already lost.
February 19th, 2013 @ 10:14 am
Georgia
Cases 578, 585 and 600 were denied, 606 is still pending. What you affirmed is incorrect !
February 19th, 2013 @ 10:18 am
Case 712 denied !! 606 Still pending a decision !!
February 19th, 2013 @ 10:30 am
No. 12A606
Title:
Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants
v.
Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State
Docketed: December 13, 2012
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of California
Case Nos.: (S207078)
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dec 11 2012 Application (12A606) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 13 2012 Application (12A606) denied by Justice Kennedy.
Dec 26 2012 Application (12A606) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice.
Jan 9 2013 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 15, 2013.
Jan 9 2013 Application (12A606) referred to the Court.
Feb 19 2013 Application (12A606) denied by the Court.
~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
Orly Taitz 29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy (949) 683-5411
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
Party name: Edward Noonan, et al.
Attorneys for Respondent:
Kamala Harris Attorney General (916) 445-9555
P. O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Party name: Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State
February 19th, 2013 @ 10:32 am
Does the attach link mean that the Feb. 15, 2013 conference is a “wash”?
https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12a606.htm
February 19th, 2013 @ 10:33 am
Denied by the court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12a606.htm
February 19th, 2013 @ 10:34 am
You can’t even get justice in America anymore. I guess if you are a criminal maybe you can.
February 19th, 2013 @ 10:48 am
Case 712 Says”Applications” Denied, and 606 is right above it. It was Denied. Treasonous Basterds!
February 19th, 2013 @ 10:54 am
Denied: https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12a606.htm
February 19th, 2013 @ 11:44 am
Then I’m still praying that there are still an honest 4 judges that love the United States. Don’t they realize that if they allow this to go on, soon this administration will not need judges anymore and they will start disappearing also.
February 19th, 2013 @ 11:53 am
12A60 and 12A712 were both Denied
https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12a606.htm
February 19th, 2013 @ 11:53 am
https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12a606.htm
February 19th, 2013 @ 11:55 am
https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12a712.htm
February 19th, 2013 @ 12:05 pm
I called the “Supreme” Court. Case #12A-606, Noonan et al v Bowen, was DENIED WITHOUT REASON GIVEN, AND APPARENTLY WITHOUT THE “JUSTICES” EVER RECEIVING ALL OF ORLY’S PLEADINGS!
In my view, the only way now to remove Obama from office is IMPEACHMENT or ARREST AND PROSECUTION.
It’s obvious the courts don’t want to take up the Natural Born Citizen issue which obviously needs to be DEFINED, re: Obama, McCain, Rubio, etc.
THE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES AND THE OPERATION OF THEIR COURT OUGHT TO BE INVESTIGATED BY CONGRESS. Then, IMPEACH THE SO-CALLED “JUSTICES” ALONG WITH OBAMA!
February 19th, 2013 @ 12:20 pm
For those in denial: “Feb 19 2013 Application (12A606) denied by the Court.”
https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12a606.htm
————————————-
Supreme Court Documents
Supreme Court Information
No. 12A606
Title:
Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants
v.
Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State
Docketed: December 13, 2012
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of California
Case Nos.: (S207078)
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dec 11 2012 Application (12A606) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 13 2012 Application (12A606) denied by Justice Kennedy.
Dec 26 2012 Application (12A606) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice.
Jan 9 2013 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 15, 2013.
Jan 9 2013 Application (12A606) referred to the Court.
Feb 19 2013 Application (12A606) denied by the Court.
~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
Orly Taitz 29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy (949) 683-5411
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
Party name: Edward Noonan, et al.
Attorneys for Respondent:
Kamala Harris Attorney General (916) 445-9555
P. O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Party name: Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State
February 19th, 2013 @ 12:20 pm
For those in denial: “Feb 19 2013 Application (12A606) denied by the Court.”
https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12a606.htm
————————————-
Supreme Court Documents
Supreme Court Information
No. 12A606
Title:
Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants
v.
Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State
Docketed: December 13, 2012
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of California
Case Nos.: (S207078)
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dec 11 2012 Application (12A606) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 13 2012 Application (12A606) denied by Justice Kennedy.
Dec 26 2012 Application (12A606) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice.
Jan 9 2013 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 15, 2013.
Jan 9 2013 Application (12A606) referred to the Court.
Feb 19 2013 Application (12A606) denied by the Court.
~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
Orly Taitz 29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy (949) 683-5411
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
Party name: Edward Noonan, et al.
Attorneys for Respondent:
Kamala Harris Attorney General (916) 445-9555
P. O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Party name: Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State
February 19th, 2013 @ 12:28 pm
Treason according to the Constitution:
Section. 3.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
Treason according to Orly Taitz:
Anyone who disagrees with me is committing treason.
February 19th, 2013 @ 12:56 pm
Orly, it appears that our case has been denied, but as you are doing- keep following up. The justices did not even see the supplemental brief and I do not believe they saw any of it either., I think that the clerks just took it upon themselves to decide.
My idea still stands especially now- think of those that hold Obama responsible- he does-
This is not over- I do believe that God is watching and he will prevail soon. This appears to really be a case of good vs evil and I believe that good will prevail. Don’t give up- you are so close- you have come so far. We are behind you 125%
February 19th, 2013 @ 2:21 pm
I saw a comment on here someplace where someone suggested Orly contact Donald Trump. I think that is a wonderful idea. I sent an email to him on his Facebook account and ask if he would help. I hope that is ok.
He could at least bring more attention to the case so many people with their heads in the sand still have no clue all that Obama has gotten away with.
I know I should have asked before I did that and I am sorry if that was a wrong thing to do.
Someone please let me know!
February 19th, 2013 @ 2:48 pm
No one can find anywhere in the US Constitution these judges are appointed for Life, they are appointed for Periods of good behavior ONLY, nothing more nothing less, “Article III” section 1
The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behavior, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services a Compensation which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.
February 19th, 2013 @ 2:52 pm
Of all the case Orders before SCOTUS, and dealing with the 12A prefix, the only one that has not been denied as of this moment is 12A606.
Orly, is that a good sign, when the jury stay that long in deliveration ?
February 19th, 2013 @ 3:16 pm
If Trump was ready to give Obama 5 million dollars for his papers, giving one million to defray the cost of this unequal battle, should not sent the Don to the poor house.
February 19th, 2013 @ 5:08 pm
Trump is full of empty talk
February 19th, 2013 @ 5:41 pm
No decision yet! From SCOTUS web site: file type icon Docket for 12A606
Title: Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State
Application (12A606) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kennedy. Application (12A606) denied by Justice Kennedy. Application (12A606) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice.
February 19th, 2013 @ 5:58 pm
Of all the case Orders before SCOTUS, and dealing with the 12A prefix, the only one that has not been denied as of this moment is 12A606.
If I were the Impostor, I would be taking three Xanax before going to bed tonight !!
February 20th, 2013 @ 12:35 am
It appears that the SCOTUS clerks may be up to their normal tricks of concealing what really happened during Tuesdays orders. At 9:50am (Tuesday;2/19/2013) a live scotusblog.com entry by Lyle Denniston stated — ‘In answer to a question, the Court denied a stay in the case of Noonan v. Bowen (12A606), but did not act on any other aspect of that case.’ — Several hours later the Supremecourt.gov docket showed ‘Application (12A606) denied by the court. It appears the docket ‘denied’ entry was intentionally entered in error or meant to be misleading, and that it is likely that more orders will come for case 12A606 on 2/10/2013. My bet is that we will have good news in this application. Truth can only be concealed for so long, and the momentum is surely running against this corrupt foreigner and his organization that has usurped the office of POTUS and occupied the people’s White House.
February 20th, 2013 @ 12:42 am
please, send me this entry in the scotusblog
February 20th, 2013 @ 6:28 am
If the power of the SCOTUS’ Clerks have reach such a point, as to being able to restrict the briefs, flow of information, and appeals that reaches the justices of the Supreme Court, I would venture to say that if that is the case, an investigation by Congress ought to be done in an expedicious manner, in order to clean up the corruption that is jeopardizing the constitutional processes of our republic.
February 20th, 2013 @ 9:57 am
Out ff the dozens of Orders denying Certiorari, one of the few cases still pending for an Order, and representing less than 5 % of the total cases, is case 12A606.
I think that this might indicate a certain conflict that might be occurring within the justices.
February 20th, 2013 @ 5:51 pm
Orly: is the poster Chief_Cabioch correct when he posts that (no one can find anything in the Constitution that says that the SC Justices are appointed for life?)!!
February 20th, 2013 @ 6:26 pm
Do tell us more of your opinions on the workings of the Supreme Court, Francisco.
February 21st, 2013 @ 4:44 pm
Can you show us Francisco where this is on the website and how to get to the information you are talking about?
Everytime I go to the link I see denied.
Is there another link we should be looking at to show a better status of the case particulars at hand?
Most of us are not lawyers…
Better late than never obama…
February 21st, 2013 @ 5:54 pm
BO PE
Go to web, in ‘For Search Term’, type Order 2/19/2013 , hit ‘Search’. At top hit on the first line where 2/19/2013 appears.
A calendar mark in different colors would appear. Hit on red 19, for February 19. Go to left side where Orders appear. Hit on that, and a list of orders would appear. Go to 2/19/2013 under Order List, hit on it, and the list would contain the case 12A606, without any decision as of this moment.
February 22nd, 2013 @ 10:30 am
Orly
As an attorney, what is your opinion as to the fact that after four days of the SCOTUS being deliverating about case 12A606, they still have not denied your petion for Certiorari?
February 22nd, 2013 @ 12:30 pm
Dr. Taitz:
I just checked the Supreme Court website and found that the case was denied:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12a606.htm
but if you look down – the order refers to Kennedy – not Roberts. And since justice Roberts was the one who agreed to hear the case, then the denial by Kennedy doesn’t make sense.
Something is wrong here.
February 23rd, 2013 @ 2:05 pm
(ORDER LIST: 568 U.S.)
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 2013
ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
12A568
GERMALIC, JAMES R. V. NY BD. OF ELECTIONS COMM’RS
(12-42)
The application for leave to file a petition for rehearing
in excess of word limits addressed to Justice Alito and referred
to the Court is denied.
12A578
JIAU, WINIFRED V. UNITED STATES
The application for bail addressed to Justice Sotomayor and
referred to the Court is denied.
12A585
PAVLOCK, MICHAEL J. V. UNITED STATES
The application for a stay addressed to Justice Sotomayor
and referred to the Court is denied.
12A600
HEDGES, CHRISTOPHER, ET AL. V. OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF U.S., ET AL.
The application to vacate stay addressed to Justice Scalia
and referred to the Court is denied.
12A606
NOONAN, EDWARD, ET AL. V. BOWEN, CA SEC. OF STATE
12A712
KWASNIK, MAREK A. V. FNMA
The applications for stay addressed to The Chief Justice and
referred to the Court are denied.
12M80
SANTAMARIA, MACARIO V. KNOWLIN, WARDEN
12M81
HARDIN, MICHELE G. V. MONROE COUNTY, FL, ET AL.
12M82
CHEVALIER, REYNAULT V. NEW YORK, ET AL.
12M83
GLENN, ENDRE V. KANE, DONNA, ET AL.
12M84
LAROCHE, MARIE B. V. FISHER, JEFFREY B., ET AL.
12M85
FRENGLER, NEIL J. V. GENERAL MOTORS, ET AL.
1
This information from https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/021913zor_19m1.pdf shows that 12A606 Noonan v Bowen is still active.
February 24th, 2013 @ 6:09 pm
Louis
I cannot tell you about the inner workings of the Supreme Court, no more than you could, but it is curious that a week after the Conference in which case 12A606 was reviewed, almost 95 % of the requests for Certiorari have been denied, and Obama’s case is still under review.
What do you make of it ?