Using a stolen Social Security number is a felony punishable by prison and a hefty fine.
Posted on | June 1, 2013 | 24 Comments
Equalizer 8 approved |
Submitted on 2013/06/01 at 2:19 am
UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS’ BULLETINJANUARY 2005: In 1981 Congress again amended 42 U.S.C.§ 408, changing the offense from a misdemeanor to a felony and adding the language “or for the purpose of obtaining anything of value from any person” before “or for any other purpose.” See Omnibus Reconciliation Act, Pub. L. No. 97-123,§ 4, 95 Stat. 1659, 1663-64 (1981). While the House Conference Report accompanying the amendment offers no explanation of the reasons for the change (see H.R. CONF. REP. NO. 97- 409(1981), reprinted in 1981 U.S.C.C.A.N. 2681,2687-88), the text of the amendment makes clear Congress’ intent both to punish a broader range of acts and to impose a stiffer penalty for misuse of the SSN. Criminal penalties are provided for: (1)knowingly and willfully using a social security number that was obtained with false information, (2) using someone else’s social security number, or (3) unlawfully disclosing or compelling the disclosure of someone else’s social security number. See H.R. CONF. REP. NO. 97-409 (1981), reprinted in 1981 U.S.C.C.A.N. 2681, 2687. Before passage of the 1998 act, the unauthorized use or transfer of identity documents was illegal under 18 U.S.C. § 1028, which included subsections (a)(1) through (a)(6). The unauthorized use of credit cards, personal identification numbers, automated teller machine codes, and other electronic access devices was illegal under another section of the U.S. Code, that is, 18 U.S.C. § 1029 (“fraud and related activity in connection with access devices”). The addition of subsection (a)(7) to § 1028 expanded the definition of “means of identification” to include such information as SSN and other government identification numbers, dates of birth, and unique biometric data (e.g., fingerprints), as well as electronic access devices and routing codes used in the financial and telecommunications sectors. Making a false statement on an I-9: A maximum penalty of 5 years in federal prison without parole and a fine up to $250,000. The reason he didn’t apply is simple: “All documents must be either originals or copies certified by the issuing agency. We cannot accept photocopies or notarized copies of documents. We also cannot accept a receipt showing you applied for the document.” Get a certified copy of a document showing a BIRTH, marriage or divorce that took place in the U.S. What original documents do I need? Citizenship Age Religious record made before the age of 5 showing your date of birth; Anyone age 12 or older requesting an original Social Security number must appear in person for an interview. We will ask for evidence to show you do not have a Social Security number. Here are examples of documents you can use to prove a Social Security number was never assigned: If you lived outside the United States for an extended period, a current or previous passport, school and/or employment records, and any other record that would show long-term residence outside the United States could be used to show you do not have a Social Security number. If you have lived in the United States and you are applying for an original Social Security number, we may ask you for information about the schools you attended or we may ask you to provide copies of tax records that would show you were never assigned a Social Security number. Approve | Reply | Quick Edit | Edit | History | Spam | Trash | Check SFS | Check HoneyPot | Report to SFS
|
Comments
24 Responses to “Using a stolen Social Security number is a felony punishable by prison and a hefty fine.”
Leave a Reply
June 1st, 2013 @ 7:08 am
Claiming identification information is true on official documents, when in fact it is false…is perjury.
June 1st, 2013 @ 7:15 am
The ridiculous explanation given by the Arpaio investigation is that BO is using a social security number that is someone else’s however, it is possible that the Social Security Administration made a mistake in giving BO that number…This is a laughable explanation especially in light of the overwhelming evidence of forged Birth Certificate and Selective Service documents.
Carl Gallups, as a man of God, Americans are appealing to you to not propagate these lies. The American people are not stupid and God hates a lier.
June 1st, 2013 @ 12:15 pm
What does the REST of the world already know about OBAMA?
The Philadelphia Trumpet is reporting:
———
Germany plans to repatriate tens of thousands of gold bars worth approximately 36 billion U.S. dollars. The gold is currently stored in the United States and France.
Berlin is probably only beginning to repossess its gold reserves. The Bundesbank’s announcement indicates that German leaders believe the
global economic crisis may soon intensify.
June 1st, 2013 @ 5:22 pm
The question may be – what is Obama’s real SSN and what information is associated with it that caused Obama to assume a stolen SSN ?
What crimes or frauds did Obama commit with his on SSN ?
June 1st, 2013 @ 5:48 pm
Jason above is correct when he states,”Claiming identification information is true on official documents, when in fact it is false…is perjury”
Obama should be indicted for perjury since he used a false SS# on his income tax. When a person signs his/her income tax form they are claiming everything on it is true. Isn’t there some kind of reward for reporting to the IRS a person lying on his/her income tax? I recall that there used to be.
June 1st, 2013 @ 5:53 pm
if he ever had a valid SSN, not a stolen one. for all we know he never had a valid one
June 1st, 2013 @ 7:45 pm
Has it ever been discovered – what SSN Obama used when he was 17yr and worked at Baskin Robbins Ice Cream in HI.
June 1st, 2013 @ 7:46 pm
Has it ever been discovered – what SSN Obama used when he was 17yr and worked at Baskin Robbins Ice Cream in HI.
June 1st, 2013 @ 8:16 pm
orly, why do you think this evil sOb has a fake social, draft card BC etc? any idea?
June 1st, 2013 @ 8:20 pm
he is not who he says he is.
not only all the evidence shows that he was born in Kenya, as there is no valid BC, no valid SSN, we do not know who came back from Indonesia in 1971. There are multiple discrepancies in 1967-1971. that is for starters
June 1st, 2013 @ 8:21 pm
are you sure they even asked for a SSN, are you sure he even worked there?
June 1st, 2013 @ 8:31 pm
Scott, Dr. Taitz has it right. Obama mentor and fellow Domestic Terrorist Bill Ayers took his young protege on a tour of cemeteries and showed him how to assume a dead mans’ identity. He had perfected it himself while on the run from authorities after bombing our Pentagon. The clown actually bragged about it later. Just to show how sick and corrupt Chicago is, he was then invited and welcomed into The University of Chicago as a Distinguished Professor. About that time Bill Ayers parents were bragging to the postman about putting a foreign student thru College. Guess who that was?
June 1st, 2013 @ 8:42 pm
they are also connected to former Chief actuary, who was there for 40 years. Databases show Obama connected to the SSN fo Lucille Ballantyne, mother of the chief actuary Harry C. Ballantyne
June 1st, 2013 @ 11:15 pm
Well, some time in the past, it’s been discussed that O has used something like (39) social security #’s!!
And (again) if he doesn’t have his own #, then, he WASN’T BORN ON AMERICAN SOIL!! As one has to get a number, to go to work!
June 2nd, 2013 @ 2:24 am
Dems are in denial. Had this been a Republican it would mean removal from office.
June 2nd, 2013 @ 5:09 am
An interesting read about how ILLEGAL ALIENS get SSNs:
—
https://fredfryinternational.blogspot.com/2007/09/how-illegal-aliens-get-social-security.html
June 2nd, 2013 @ 6:50 am
The fact that Obama has navigated his Social Security scandal with great placidity, showcases how corrupt our Court system has become. Not only the system is broken, but the other balancing power, Congress, is as corrupt as the Court System.
What is even more inconceiveable, is the fact that a US citizen does not have ‘standing’ to challenge the elligibility of a president, when he or she demostrate that Obama has been using a stolen Social Security number, which is a criminal offense.
December 18th, 2015 @ 7:57 am
[…] Using a stolen Social Security number … – The ridiculous explanation given by the Arpaio investigation is that BO is using a social security number that is someone else’s however, it is possible … […]
July 27th, 2016 @ 3:23 am
I’m looking for help here, my wife claims I hit herand won the case big time they took her side, no proof nothing never been arrested in my life no pictures no calls to cops to my house ever nothing and said she was terrified of me,she actually took all our savings and retirement and ran,I think I know where she is but that’s think… Anyways it indicates that if say I was born in Texas my social security number would start 456 that indicates were the card was issued, and the middle two numbers around when… 456 Texas 8X XXXX DATE issued around 1987 88…. SHE’S 50YRS OLD….. If you all know anybody that can help me out with this please… mendezinsa@yahoo.com
July 27th, 2016 @ 4:27 am
Have you filed a report with the police? where are you located?
July 31st, 2016 @ 11:46 pm
I KNOW SOMEONE THAT HAS 2 SS NUMBERS AND HE USES THE ONE THATS NOT HIS TO GET JOBS BECAUSE HIS REAL SS NUMBER HE IS A FELON. AND HE USES THE ONE THAT HES A FELON TO GET FOOD STAMPS. HOW CAN I REPORT THIS?
August 1st, 2016 @ 5:24 am
contact the police
March 25th, 2017 @ 9:21 am
Code was updated to a felony to make it easier to remove illegal immigrants.
However, the executive branch recently pursued the use of USC 18 in removing immigrants.
When you have an administration reduction of immigrants under TITLE 8, it is unconstitutional to use TITLE 18.
Under the 14th Amendment of the Constitution, “…nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws….”
Clearly, having been host to a great number of people for an extended period of time, and in some case in excess of 47 years, it is a violation of the 8th Amendment, “…excessive fines, or cruel and unusual punishment…”
Further, imposition of the Laws of Immigration, as desired by the Congress, and legally made law by vote, is constitutional.
To subject people to Criminal Prosecution, as a guise for imposition of lawful immigration reform, is unconstitutional.
Lastly, In 1981 Congress again amended 42 U.S.C.§ 408…the use of police powers under 42 USC Section 408 is EX POST FACTO and a direct violation of the 14th amendment, for those that were in country, and removed for this felony charge.
March 25th, 2017 @ 11:42 am
all of this sounds like a total BS. They can deport all 30 million under section 8. These people are here illegally, subject to deportations. Period