OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

This affidavit will be included in the appeal to the Supreme Court

Posted on | July 6, 2010 | 7 Comments

Category: Uncategorized

Comments

7 Responses to “This affidavit will be included in the appeal to the Supreme Court”

  1. Chris
    July 7th, 2010 @ 5:17 am

    There’s only one problem I see with this statement. AG Holder is a rather large man. In this statement, this guy says he’s small in stature. That’s just not true or the guy that wrote this is an extremely large person and sees Holder as a small person. Most people would disagree. I’ve seen him in person and he is NOT small in stature.

  2. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    July 7th, 2010 @ 6:41 am

    This statement is not brought to show that Holder was definitely there, but there was a possibility, this man provided me with an affidavit, I had to submit it to court. Judge Land already used inappropriate language and remarks, he showed himself to be biased, it was his duty to recuse himself, yet he didn’t

  3. raicha
    July 7th, 2010 @ 8:07 am

    The other problem is that the Supreme Court does not accept evidence. You can only argue the application of the law.

  4. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    July 7th, 2010 @ 8:26 am

    I am not submitting new evidence, this was submitted to the district court. It just shows that there were multiple reasons for Clay D. Land to recuse himself and show impartiality, yet he decided to do a hit job

  5. martin
    July 7th, 2010 @ 11:36 am

    Why aren’t you dead yet?

  6. Chum Lee
    July 8th, 2010 @ 3:17 am

    Orly, not sure I follow. Are you arguing that one reason that Land should have recused himself was because some guy swears he possibly saw Land talking to Holder?

  7. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    July 8th, 2010 @ 6:34 am

    no, main reason he should have recused himself, because he was totally biased, showed zero impartiality. There is an inherent conflict of interest, when one of the parties is the president, who can give Land promotion to higher court. That was the reason, why a demanded a jury to decide all issues of law and fact

Leave a Reply