17 Responses to “Press release Reply in support for Motion for Summary Judgment in favor of plaintiff filed with judge Hollander”

1. Anonymous
   March 11th, 2014 @ 12:29 pm

   Fed R. Civ. P. 1002, 1003, and 1004 amendments were issued by Court order of the U.S. Supreme Court in April, 2011 and ordered effective December, 2011.

   Associate Justices Sotomayor and Kagen sat on the Supreme Court when those Fed. R. Civ. P. were amended by court order, submitted to Congress for codification and signed into law by President Obama. Chief Justice Roberts transmited the Court order to Congress.

   YOU NOTIFIED CJ Roberts, with exhibits, Obama was ineligible in March, 2009 and CJ Roberts did nothing. OBJECT!

   Furthermore, Judge Hollander was appointed by Obama. Object and demand she recuse or set a date for a hearing on the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama II.

2. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   March 11th, 2014 @ 2:45 pm

   so far Judge Hollander was fair, there is no reason to object.
   We’ll see what she decides. Considering that in 2012 the SSA already found the SS-5 for Bounel, I can’t imagine her not deciding in my favor. What would be the basis for her to decide in favor of the feds?

3. Harry
   March 11th, 2014 @ 3:02 pm

   is this good news or what?- does this mean that there is one honest judge left in America that cannot be bought?- I can only imagine the incredible pressure by the Obama (& Holder) against these honest people who even dare defy the biggest FRAUD in history-and that is exactly what Obama is when he is found guilty of treason and high crimes against America- no I do not have a law degree but even us underlings of low estate know the difference between right & wrong- I will continue to pray to Almighty God for a just result and I realize that this is only the beginning because Obama and his evil backers have lots of resources and behind the scenes politics- I am praising God for this news-

4. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   March 11th, 2014 @ 3:07 pm

   I am praying that she will have integrity, that is all I can ask for

5. Anonymous
   March 11th, 2014 @ 3:41 pm

   Dr Taitz, I must answer your question with a question. In all your previous cases, with the evidence you provided the court, why would any of the Judges sided with the Criminals?

6. ELSIE GANZON
   March 11th, 2014 @ 4:09 pm

   Tuesday 11 March 2014

   – – A M E N – –

7. Cicero
   March 11th, 2014 @ 4:26 pm

   I hate to say this but, the only thing a tyrant understands is out right violence. Please refer to the “Declaration of Independence.” Petitions and voting are useless. They laugh and party on our dime. Our founding fathers mostly died and their families lost all they had for liberty.

   “An armed society is a polite society when the words you speak, you might have to back up with your life.” Robert Anson Heinlein

   Barry, whatever his name is, is a worthless little scumbag who most likely could never defend himself. I don’t hate him, I pity him, he is not a real man. He is a worthless pussy.

8. js/js
   March 11th, 2014 @ 4:39 pm

   IMO, all we can hope for is that Hollander does
   not suddenly go the way of Loretta Fuddy or
   Vince Foster. We shall see. Keep hoping for
   the best.

9. Anonymous
   March 11th, 2014 @ 5:58 pm

   Judge Hollander has a conflict of interest with the subject matter of the suit. If Obama is found to have used a false I.D., then it is likely he is ineligible for President. If ineligible, then Judge Hollander, as an appointee or Obama, may lose her job. At a minimum, you should ask the Court to assign a non-Obama appointee to hear the case.

   If you allow Hollander to rule, then your opportunity to object to Hollander as a judge with a conflict of interest will be forfeited. If Hollander refuses to recuse, then it is your right to object and demand a hearing on Obama’s eligibility. At the hearing, you allege Obama is ineligible because he is using false I.D.s. It will then be Obama’s burden to prove he is using the SSN assigned to him. Furthermore, you can subpoena all of his SSN records to impeach any claim he is using the SSN assigned to him.

10. will
    March 11th, 2014 @ 7:39 pm

    annon… because for the most part judges are criminals in black robes…
    will

11. John
    March 11th, 2014 @ 7:43 pm

    $$MONEY$$

    IT’S All About the $MONEY$

    Follow the Money Trail.

12. DR. STEPHEN PARKER
    March 11th, 2014 @ 9:32 pm

    The SSA will tell the court that they searched the vault and cannot find the Bounel SS application. And, in fact, it is no longer in the vault. It has been removed and, more than likely, destroyed. The court will have no choice but to accept the SSA statement. Case dismissed without prejudice.

13. RB
    March 12th, 2014 @ 7:27 am

    My opinion is the closer Obamas term comes to ending and his power wanes then we will see more authorities start to realize they have been complicit in criminal behavior and gradually try to save themselves by stopping the cover-ups. Keep up the pressure.

14. Jerry G
    March 12th, 2014 @ 9:28 am

    “Why would any of the judges side with the Criminals?” Because they too are criminals.

15. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    March 12th, 2014 @ 9:55 am

    no, it is there, the case will not be dismissed

16. DSP2
    March 12th, 2014 @ 11:03 am

    Then Judge Hollander needs to know, Obama is scheduled to leave the country to muslim friendly Saudi Arabia with no extradition treaty. Time is of the essence!!

17. Starlight
    March 12th, 2014 @ 5:29 pm

    Remember “judge” Malihi? His lack
    of legal protocol was just about as
    down and dirty as a judge can get,

    and in these cases, that is pretty low.

    This guy should have been sent out
    to pasture in a federal prison,
    for what he did not do for justice.

    From past experiences with the
    crooked judges, we are being
    naive to think one won’t turn on
    us at the last minute.

    As for the deputy clerks taking it
    upon themselves to obliterate any
    legal papers, maybe even destroy
    them, shred them, act as if they
    have no knowledge of them,

    that is the height of treason
    and they should be granted
    their deserved sentencing.

    There must be a private phone
    number to reach Judge Hollander.
    Or a registered letter delivered
    only to her personally.

    She can’t be so incommunicado
    that her accessibility is
    impossible.

    BUT if true, appointed by
    the Big Crook, himself,
    we know how that will go down.

    I was reading a comment on the
    Public Comments Board to Congress,
    where the post was a judge can
    issue the arrest warrant, and a sheriff
    can do the honors.

    Where are all the sheriffs that
    are banding together to protest Obama’s
    mandates? For instance, Sheriff Mack?

    Talk, blogs, letters, promises,
    and no action.

    It is pitiful.

Leave a Reply