FAMILIES OF WAUKESHA VICTIMS SHOULD SUE MILWAUKEE PROSECUTOR FOR VIOLATION OF THEIR RIGHTS UNDER THE COLOUR OF AUTHORITY AND FOR VIOLATION OF OATH OF OFFICE
Posted on | November 25, 2021 | 1 Comment
FAMILIES OF WAUKESHA VICTIMS SHOULD SUE MILWAUKEE PROSECUTOR FOR VIOLATION OF THEIR RIGHTS UNDER THE COLOUR OF AUTHORITY AND FOR VIOLATION OF OATH OF OFFICE
By Dr. Orly TAITZ, ESQ
As we all know, Darrell Brooks, a career criminal with 10 felony convictions drove his SUV into the Christmas parade and murdered 5 victims and injured over 40.
What is most infuriating is the fact that only a few weeks ago Brooks drove over his girlfriend and the mother of his child. He was let go on only $1,000 bail.
Millwaukee DA is known for letting criminals free on extremely low bail. When asked by a reporter whether it would cause murderers to go free, John Chishom, Millwaukee DA said, yes it will, and continued this policy.
US code 18 US § 242 allows for incarceration of officials who deprived citizens of their rights under the color of law. Recently, leftist district attorneys have embarked on a policy of letting dangerous criminals free with no bail or a very small bail, which deprives us, the public, of our freedoms and in case of Waukesha victims, it deprived them of their lives.
Additionally, district attorneys take an oath of office. Letting criminals go, being a de facto part of a massive jail break that we see around the country and particularly in liberal jurisdictions, is a clear violation of the oath of office to defend the public.
Similarly, during last year’s riots liberal DAs let most rioters and looters go without any prison time. Kamala Harris was involved in raising money for bail for the rioters and looters. Today, we are seeing massive brazen robberies, when packs of criminals descend of stores like locust and steel everything in sight.
It is time for us, the public to stand up. If even one district attorney or prosecutor is found liable, others will think twice before they let criminals go scot free.
While prosecutors will try the defense of “prosecutorial discretion”, such discretion has to be reasonable. For example, letting a man who just drove over a woman on a $1,000 bail is not reasonable, and such unreasonable actions led to death of 5 people and injuries to 40 others after the same criminal drove over them only few days later.
Do you agree with me? You can post comments on TaitzReport.com
18 U.S. Code § 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
Comments
One Response to “FAMILIES OF WAUKESHA VICTIMS SHOULD SUE MILWAUKEE PROSECUTOR FOR VIOLATION OF THEIR RIGHTS UNDER THE COLOUR OF AUTHORITY AND FOR VIOLATION OF OATH OF OFFICE”
Leave a Reply
November 25th, 2021 @ 1:19 pm
The only person responsible is the accused. Conservatives used to believe in personal responsibility. And as far as bail is concerned, money is not the point. What is the point is that he shouldn’t be eligible for bail if accused of a serious crime of violence. In Canada, which is very soft on many things, he wouldn’t have been bailed at any amount. Otherwise you’d see rich defendants getting bail while poor defendants stay in jail.