Cover up of crime: from Trayvon Martin to Nikolas Cruz
Posted on | February 26, 2018 | 10 Comments
About 5 years ago the nation was rocked by the death of Treyvon Martin, which led to a wave of marches by Black Lives Matter, towns and neighborhoods torched and destroyed in upheaval.
But let’s look at the root of the problem. Back in 2012 a program started by the Obama administration to lower statics of crimes committed by the high school students by simply not reporting those crimes to the police and not arresting those students.
Here is an article about Treyvon Martin, who was not arested twice: firstly, when he was caught with stolen jewelry and second time with marijuana.
“The February 2012 shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martion might never have happened if school officials in Miami-Dade County had not instituted an unofficial policy of treating crimes as school disciplinary infractions. Revelations that emerged from an internal affairs investigation explain why Martin was not arrested when caught at school with stolen jewelry in October 2011 or with marijuana in February 2012. Instead, the teenager was suspended from school, the last time just days before he was shot dead by George Zimmerman.
Trayvon Martin was not from Sanford, the town north of Orlando where he was shot in 2012 and where a jury acquitted Zimmerman of murder charges Saturday. Martin was from Miami Gardens, more than 200 miles away, and had come to Sanford to stay with his father’s girlfriend Brandy Green at her home in the townhouse community where Zimmerman was in charge of the neighborhood watch. Trayvon was staying with Green after he had been suspended for the second time in six months from Krop High School in Miami-Dade County, where both his father, Tracy Martin, and mother, Sybrina Fulton, lived.
Both of Trayvon’s suspensions during his junior year at Krop High involved crimes that could have led to his prosecution as a juvenile offender. However, Chief Charles Hurley of the Miami-Dade School Police Department (MDSPD) in 2010 had implemented a policy that reduced the number of criiminal reports, manipulating statistics to create the appearance of a reduction in crime within the school system. Less than two weeks before Martin’s death, the school system commended Chief Hurley for “decreasing school-related juvenile delinquency by an impressive 60 percent for the last six months of 2011.” What was actually happening was that crimes were not being reported as crimes, but instead treated as disciplinary infractions.
In October 2011, after a video surveillance camera caught Martin writing graffiti on a door, MDSPD Office Darryl Dunn searched Martin’s backpack, looking for the marker he had used. Officer Dunn found 12 pieces of women’s jewelry and a man’s watch, along with a flathead screwdriver the officer described as a “burglary tool.” The jewelry and watch, which Martin claimed he had gotten from a friend he refused to name, matched a description of items stolen during the October 2011 burglary of a house on 204th Terrace, about a half-mile from the school. However, because of Chief Hurley’s policy “to lower the arrest rates,” as one MDSPD sergeant said in an internal investigation, the stolen jewerly was instead listed as “found property” and was never reported to Miami-Dade Police who were investigating the burglary. Similarly, in February 2012 when an MDSPD officer caught Martin with a small plastic bag containing marijuana residue, as well as a marijuana pipe, this was not treated as a crime, and instead Martin was suspended from school.
Either of those incidents could have put Trayvon Martin into the custody of the juvenile justice system. However, because of Chief Hurley’s attempt to reduce the school crime statistics — according to sworn testimony, officers were “basically told to lie and falsify” reports — Martin was never arrested. And if he had been arrested, he might never have been in Sanford the night of his fatal encounter with Zimmerman.
In fact, the reason Zimmerman was patrolling the townhouse community the night of the February 2012 shooting was thatthere had been a rash of burglaries in the neighborhood, although there was no indication that Trayvon Martin was involved in any of those crimes.
As for Chief Hurley’s policy, it was the controversy over Martin’s death that accidentally exposed it. In March 2012, the Miami Herald reported on Martin’s troubled history of disciplinary incidents at Krop High. Chief Hurley then launched the internal affairs investigation in an attempt to find out who had provided information to the reporter. During the course of that investigation, MDSPD officers and supervisors described Chief Hurley’s policy of not reporting crimes by students. Chief Hurley was subsequently accused of sexually harassing two female subordinates. He resigned in February, about a year after Trayvon Martin’s death.” https://spectator.org/54312_how-miami-school-crime-cover-policy-led-trayvon-martins-death/
- Similarly, Nikolas Cruz was never arrested, even though there were constant reports of him being violent: throwing rocks at cars, sticking a gun to his brother’s head, hitting the neighbor’s car with a baseball bat, torturing animals, threatening to shoot a school.
- For the sake of bogus statistics and federal dollars that went with this bogus statistics, the school administrators and the police did nothing and ultimately endangered the school and children.
- The schools simply suspended students who were caught committing crimes. What did the suspension do? They simply stayed at home with nothing to do and an opportunity to commit more crimes. It is time to rethink those programs. Recently I talked to a lady who works in a home for troubled teens, who were kicked out of foster homes. Unfortunately, those teens have more rights than the workers who take care of them. The workers have their hands tied behind their backs and cannot discipline these teens at all and those teens become more arrogant, more obnoxious and more violent. This woman, who wants to stay anonymous to keep her job was telling me that those teens have no concept of curfew. They may show up at 12 at night and demand a dinner to be served to them in the middle of the night. The rules in CA are such that the worker cannot tell this teen that the dinner is at 6. If he does not eat during dinner time, he can grab a sandwich or warm the leftovers. The caretaker is supposed to cook a fresh dinner from scratch in the middle of the night, as the rules state that this misfits and derelicts are supposed to get a freshly cooked dinner, regardless of the time when they show up in this group home. These teens know their rights all too well, yet they are never taught any responsibility.
- Years ago problematic students were given a choice of either a juvenile hall or a military school. Many turned their lives around in those military schools. It might be time to go back to this choice.
- By Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
- “The Obama-era Departments of Education and Justice – under education secretary Arne Duncan and Attorney General Eric Holder –issued school guidelines in 2014 that claimed students of color are “disproportionately impacted” by suspensions and expulsions, a situation they said leads to a “school-to-prison pipeline” that discriminates against minority and low-income students.“Broward County was the first to have the goal of lowering suspensions, lowering expulsions, lowering arrests,” explains Eden. “And, so, they decided to reduce police involvement by not bringing in cops to arrest kids for a whole range of serious offenses, and then, as you would expect, the arrests go down when you stop arresting. That was taken to be a sign of success, based on that metric alone.”According to the Obama administration’s 2014 “Dear Colleague” guidance, any school district whose disciplinary measures showed “disparate impact” – meaning a disproportionately greater number of minority students are affected – is open to investigation by the Departments of Justice and Education, regardless of whether the behavior leading to the discipline is unacceptable.Eden explained at National Review in November how the Obama-era school discipline policy “extended Black Lives Matter’s ideology down into America’s classrooms”:
Social-justice activists assumed that just as racial disparities in the criminal-justice system must be evidence that cops are (at least implicitly) racist, so too racial disparities in school suspensions must be evidence that teachers are (at least implicitly) racist. Therefore, teachers — like cops — have to be restrained.
Several years before the Obama school discipline policy appeared, however, the Broward County school board hired as superintendent Robert Runcie – who had worked for Duncan in Chicago – and also joined with the NAACP, law enforcement, and government agencies to adopt the district’s Collaborative Agreement on School Discipline, dubbed PROMISE (Preventing Recidivism through Opportunities, Mentoring, Interventions, Support, and Education).
As M. Catharine Evans reports at American Thinker, in academic year 2011-2012, just prior to the school board’s decision to hire Runcie, the Broward County public school district had 1,062 school-related arrests – the highest number in Florida.
Evans continues:
The Obama administration’s Department of Education was also involved in implementing PROMISE. Obama, who routinely dangled carrots in the form of matching federal grants to local districts for their participation in Common Core and Race to the Top, doled out millions to Broward.
With the promise of federal monies, it’s no surprise that Superintendent Runcie (annual salary: $335,000) was happy to oblige his friends in D.C. Within a year of Runcie’s arrival, student arrest rates were down 66 percent, and Broward County Schools were about to hit the federal jackpot.
One of the premises of the PROMISE program cited in the agreement and supported by data from the Obama Department of Education Office for Civil Rights reads:
WHEREAS, across the country, students of color, students with disabilities and LGBTQ students are disproportionately impacted by school-based arrests for the same behavior as their peers.
“In 2015, the Obama administration brought them to a White House Summit on rethinking school discipline and to highlight their success and tell school districts throughout the country, ‘Look at what Broward is doing as an example,’” Eden says.
Broward County Sheriff Union president Jeff Bell told Laura Ingraham on Fox News that he places some blame for the horrific shooting on the school board and the adoption of its PROMISE program:
For years they know that the schools have been soft targets, and they claim that they want to have better police presence inside the schools, and they want tougher security, but, yet, they do not want to cough up the money to pay for that better security and fortify their schools and have better designs. They don’t want that. And, then when they are fortunate to have a school resource officer deputy on scene, and armed police presence, a lot of the liberal-thinking principals on campus there, they don’t want the police officers making arrests on campus, and they don’t want the drugs to be found on campus, and they don’t want the warrants to be served on campus because it looks like there’s bad stats at the school.
So, I place a lot of blame on the school board with that and some of the programs that they’ve initiated with the state attorney and the sheriff’s office in years past. For example, the PROMISE program … the problem is when that program started, we took all discretion away from the law enforcement officers to effect an arrest if we choose to.
During an interview Sunday with CNN’s Jake Tapper, Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel first defended the PROMISE program as one that is “helping many, many people,” but then later admitted that if a report is not made about an aggressive student’s behavior to law enforcement, “there’s no malfeasance or misfeasance if you don’t know about something” https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/02/26/broward-county-likely-inspiration-for-obama-school-discipline-policy-to-report-fewer-arrests-suspensions/
How a Miami School Crime Cover-Up Policy Led to Trayvon Martin’s …
https://spectator.org/54312_how-miami-school-crime-cover-policy-led-trayvon-marti…
Jul 15, 2013 – Revelations that emerged from an internal affairs investigation explain why Martin was not arrested when caught at school with stolen jewelry in October 2011 or with marijuana in February 2012. Instead, the teenager was suspended from school, the last time just days before he was shot dead by George …
Trayvon Martin case: He was suspended three times and caught with …
www.dailymail.co.uk/…/Trayvon-Martin-case-He-suspended-times-caught-burglary-t…
Mar 26, 2012 – Trayvon suspended THREE times for ‘drugs, truancy, graffiti and carrying burglary tool’ and did he attack bus driver too?
The Curious Case Of Trayvon Martin’s Backpack With Stolen Jewelry
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/…/m-dspd-cover-up-the-curious-case-of-trayvon…
Apr 30, 2013 – It was only as a consequence of the M-DSPD internal affairs investigation that “
Trayvon Martin Suspended From School Three Times: Report – NBC 6 …
https://www.nbcmiami.com/…/Trayvon-Martin-Suspended-From-School-Three-Times…
Mar 27, 2012 – Trayvon Martin Suspended From School Three Times: Report. Teen suspended …. No evidence was ever released that the jewelry was stolen. “We have … Four months after the October incident, Martin was suspended after he was caught with the empty baggie with traces of marijuana in it, the report said.
Comments
10 Responses to “Cover up of crime: from Trayvon Martin to Nikolas Cruz”
Leave a Reply
February 28th, 2018 @ 3:55 am
Petition whitehouse for right of free speech
The American Internet Bill of Rights.
Help the petition reach its goal, share with others:
URL: https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/american…
February 28th, 2018 @ 5:53 am
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/02/26/jack-cashill-incompetence-wasnt-the-problem-in-broward-county/comment-page-4/#comment-5067610
February 28th, 2018 @ 7:28 am
Great analyses Dr. Taitz. Teens gone wild courtesy of obama/soetoro/soebarkah, holder, and duncan. You’re correct, time to abolish this insanity. Betsy DeVos has her job cut out for her.
February 28th, 2018 @ 8:55 am
The way this editorial was written was not reflective of the fact that a grown man was told not to get out of his car and approach. Not only did a grown man get out of his car he also had a gun.
My issue with this story is the fact that you mention Trayvon’s Martins background like that had anything to do with him being shot by a grown man which you clearly did not discuss his racist background.
The grown man that murdered Trayvon Martin had previously indicated his hatred for blacks even though his dna indicates he has a small percentage.
I’m talking about a crime from a human being murdering another human being unjustifiably.
You are talking about his background in such a manner that it has nothing to do with an assault rifle shooting up a school.
The only two and two you putting together is govt is not doing their job when it comes to being proactive to the next killer.
Why was not the grown man’s background talked about in your article?
Maybe the grown man also could have been monitored since he beat up his girlfriends.
Why wasnt the grown man who beat up his girlfriends and threaten them with guns being monitored. Maybe this would have stopped the murder of Trayvon Martin if the govt could have profiled this person who was threatening others before he murdered Trayvon.
If you are going to discuss govt failure discuss both sides instead of highlighting one side.
Touche..
Do you see the bias of your reporting?
Nope you dont and that’s the problem.
February 28th, 2018 @ 12:23 pm
But the fact remains that whatever Treyvon Martin had done previously, Zimmerman had no knowledge of it and Martin was unarmed and doing nothing wrong at the time he was killed. Zimmerman was protected (appropriately) by a Stand Your Ground law. He shouldn’t have fired, but he did nothing illegal Cruz is a mass murderer but he’s still alive. The deputies should have fired, but the probably didn’t do anything illegal either. Both are bad outcomes.
March 1st, 2018 @ 5:15 am
@Martha. If someone is banging your head against the ground and you are fearing for your life, would you use your weapon to defend yourself? There were plenty of photos that showed Zimmerman’s injuries. If that’s not doing something wrong I don’t know what it is. Most of all Martha, Martin had been dead for months and nothing was said until a female reporter decided to instigate racial discord. When Martin was killed it was reported first it was reported that it had been by a Hispanic male. Of course that did not interest many people. All of a sudden this female reporter decided to stick in the narrative that the shooter was a “white male Hispanic”. That’s when it became news! Martin thought he was going to bully another of his victims and lost his life in the process.
March 1st, 2018 @ 11:51 am
Well, if I remember correctly…
Martin did something…
Didn’t he start a fight with Zimmerman?
And this turned into the fatal outcome?
March 1st, 2018 @ 12:07 pm
And this also shows how much each home needs a father-figure…!
March 1st, 2018 @ 6:45 pm
Taino, Zimmerman is an unstable and violent man. Martin didn’t just attack him.
March 25th, 2018 @ 6:40 am
@Noola. Martin did attacked him when confronted about his whearabouts and the evidence and police reports back it up. Do your research.