OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

According to Canadian citizenship act of 1946 Canada did not allow dual citizenship, as such Cruz was only a citizen of Canada at birth. Reportedly his father was a citizen of Canada from 1968. Contact every presidential candidate, inquire if he is willing to file an eligibility law suit

Posted on | January 17, 2016 | 12 Comments

 

According to the Canadian Citizenship Act of 1946, also referred to as the “Act of 1947” because of its effective date, Canada did not allow dual citizenship. This was the first citizenship act in Canada to create a new citizenship status separate from being considered British Subjects. With the pride of a nation first enacting the right to become Canadian Citizens, it would stand to reason why they also chose at the time to not allow dual citizenship. According to the Government of Canada’s website, the heading “History of citizenship legislation” states the following:

Up to January 1, 1947, there was no legal status of Canadian citizens, only British subjects. This Act gave legal recognition to the terms “Canadian citizen” and “Canadian citizenship”. The Act established who was and who could become a Canadian citizen. There were many provisions for loss of citizenship, including retention provisions for the first and subsequent generations born outside Canada. The Act also contained provisions which provided special treatment for British subjects. In general, Canadian citizens who acquired citizenship of another country automatically lost Canadian citizenship (dual citizenship was not recognized).

It was not until the passage of the “Citizenship Act” effective on February 15, 1977 that the ability to hold dual citizenship was changed.

The Citizenship Act, effective February 15, 1977, replaced the 1947 Act with a more equitable statute. For example, British subjects no longer received special treatment and dual citizenship became recognized. There was only one provision for automatic loss of citizenship, limited to persons born in the second or subsequent generation outside Canada unless they took steps to retain their citizenship by their 28th birthday.

In the following years, Canada has continued to go in the direction of granting increasingly more generous grounds for automatic Canadian citizenship, seemingly in an attempt to continue the strengthening of Canadian nationalism. To learn more about the beginning growth of Canadian nationalism, read in the Government of Canada archive, “Forging Our Legacy: Canadian Citizenship and Immigration, 1900-1977“.

In order for Ted Cruz to have “become” a US citizen at birth in 1970, his mother would have had to retain exclusive citizenship to the US and filed a CRBA (Consular Report of Birth Abroad) to “obtain” exclusive US citizenship at the time for her son Ted and renounced his automatic “naturally acquired” Canadian citizenship. The process in itself is considered a very abbreviated form of “naturalization”, thereby making such persons born outside of the OFFICIAL territories of the United States absolutely ineligible to become President of these United States in at least this one circumstance alone. Given that Canadian law did not allow dual citizenship at the time, then IF his mother filed a CRBA in 1970, his Canadian citizenship would likely have needed to be renounced before a new US citizenship could be granted.

Ted’s Father has publicly admitted he became a Canadian citizen in 1968. If his mother’s first husband with surname of “Wilson” was also a Canadian citizen (unconfirmed), she would have become a citizen before his father. Even if her first husband was not Canadian, according to Canadian law, she would still have automatically become a Canadian citizen in 1969 after having a Canadian spouse (Ted’s Father) and residing in Canada for 1 year. This information substantiates the reports claiming that both of his parents appeared on the Canadian voter’s rolls. There is now an unconfirmed claim that someone has supposedly verified that they indeed both voted in the October of 1972 federal Canadian election.

If both of Ted’s parents became exclusive citizens of Canada by 1969, then even if his mother tried to file a CRBA, she would not have been able to confer US citizenship to her son as she was no longer a US citizen herself. Even if she somehow retained US citizenship, Ted could not have been granted dual citizenship as it was against Canadian law. The only thing that is certain is that Ted Cruz automatically became a Canadian citizen the instant he was born on Canadian soil and that fact is absolutely irrefutable. Likewise, the release of his mother’s birth certificate certainly settles absolutely nothing.

Ted Cruz did not renounce his Canadian citizenship until 2014. All FOIA requests have been denied requesting a copy of a CRBA and he has not released it or any other naturalization papers. There is currently no proof available to show he ever became a US citizen. It is perfectly understandable that he would not want to release any such naturalization documents as one cannot be considered both “naturalized” and :”natural-born”. Senator Cruz has repeatedly claimed that he did not have to go through any type of naturalization process (including a CRBA), that he was automatically a US citizen by birth but that does not match US law for persons born in another country. If indeed that was just assumed and nothing was ever filed to correct that erroneous assumption, then he never has become a US citizen and referring to a previous article, Ted Cruz must show naturalization papers to keep his US senate seat.

Even though Marco Rubio also can’t be a natural-born citizen and is instead considered an “anchor baby”, his parents did become US citizens 4 years after his birth. He is therefore legally able to serve in the US Senate regardless of your interpretation of birthright citizenship.

Contrary to recent blatantly false headlines, there have been at least now 5 lawsuits filed in 5 different states challenging Ted Cruz’ eligibility to become President, a majority of these also equally challengeMarco Rubio’s eligibility even though it is rarely reported. The states are/were: NH, VT, FL, IL and TX. Every Republican candidate running for President should be immediately filing lawsuits to have both Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio removed from the presidential contest as their continued participation presents an unlawful detriment to everyone else’s candidacy.

Category: Uncategorized

Comments

12 Responses to “According to Canadian citizenship act of 1946 Canada did not allow dual citizenship, as such Cruz was only a citizen of Canada at birth. Reportedly his father was a citizen of Canada from 1968. Contact every presidential candidate, inquire if he is willing to file an eligibility law suit”

  1. Wondering
    January 17th, 2016 @ 6:29 am

    tIs this FEDERAL law the one that CRUZ says qualifies him to be a POTUS candidate? This law says for “free white person”only for the 1795 fed law.. How did Obama make it ?

    United States Congress, “An act to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization” (March 26, 1790).

    This section repeals the 1790 law

    SEC. 4. And be it further enacted, That the Act intituled, “An act to establish an uniform rule of naturalization,” passed the twenty-sixth day of March, one thousand seven hundred and ninety, be, and the same is hereby repealed

    https://www.indiana.edu/~kdhist/H105-documents-web/week08/naturalization1790.html

    PDF
    https://library.uwb.edu/static/USimmigration/1%20stat%20103.pdf

  2. Kevin J Lankford
    January 17th, 2016 @ 6:36 am

    As the intrigue seems to grow with more being revealed, the simple fact that one is born outside the U.S. of a father whose citizenship is subject to foreign jurisdiction should satisfy all question that such a one does not qualify for the office of the President of These United States.

    Just as obama most definitely does not qualify.

  3. Philip stone
    January 17th, 2016 @ 7:07 am

    It appears that Cruz is Canadian on top of not being NBC. So — what is the process to remove him from the Senate?

  4. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    January 17th, 2016 @ 7:18 am

    there has to be a decision of the court, a declaratory judgment as Trump stated

  5. Philip stone
    January 17th, 2016 @ 7:30 am

    Thought he could be impeached to be removed from the Senate but can it be done if he is not legally a Senator? Is this something for the Senate to take care of since he is apparently Canadian?

  6. Ray Graham
    January 17th, 2016 @ 9:00 am

    If we had honest courts there would be no problem. Since we know through the fight
    Dr. Taitz has experienced in the Obama issue there won’t be any justice coming out of our courts anytime soon. You can rest assured Ted Cruz has nothing until just before the election, if he is the Republican nominee. The all hell will break loose from the Democrats.

  7. Carol
    January 17th, 2016 @ 9:16 am

    Senator Cruz made his and his mothers birth certificates available for all to see. I still question his parents marital status at the time of his birth His mother’s certificate still had her former husbands last name for herself. There are so many loose ends and they keep unravelling all the time. Her former husband is alive and well in London, Eng. and it appears she was still using his name when Ted was born according to his birth certificate. Cruz has created a huge mess and I had prayed that we would not see anything like 2008 and 2012 again and this seems to be just a bad or worse.

  8. Donna
    January 17th, 2016 @ 9:41 am

    They are allowing non natural born citizens to run for poutus in order to destroy the Constitution! Obviously they want us to raise Cain!

  9. Steve Wittlake
    January 17th, 2016 @ 10:22 am

    Ted Cruz revoked his Canadian Citizenship himself and his mother was a Canadian citizen at the time. Does that not mean he is an illegal alien and should be deported.
    In this case where is the derivative citizenship.

  10. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    January 17th, 2016 @ 10:31 am

    we do not have irrefutable proof that his mother was a Canadian citizen, however even if she wasn’t, he still does not qualify

  11. Paula Hoehn
    January 17th, 2016 @ 11:42 am

    Dear Orly,

    Ted Cruz’s mother had listed her name on his birth certificate as ‘Eleanor Elizabeth Wilson’ in answer to the question on the form of “Name of Mother Before Marriage”.

    However, did the Canadian government mean her name before her 1st marriage to Wilson where it was Darragh-(maiden name), or before her 2nd marriage to Rafael Cruz where it was Wilson-(retained after divorce)?

    I think the question on most US birth certificates is usually what is Mother’s maiden name.

    I think it is significant that at least one person has raised the issue of a stateless Ted Cruz: ‘Ted Cruz – the man without a country’ because his mother likely naturalized to Canadian citizenship when her husband Rafael Cruz naturalized to Canadian citizenship giving up her US citizenship and if she did that before Ted was born she couldn’t provide Ted with US citizenship at birth, and then in 2014 Ted Cruz relinquished his Canadian citizenship; in addition, his mother was required by his foreign birth abroad to file a CRBA before his 18th birthday for him to retain ‘US citizen at birth’ if she had been even been eligible to pass US citizenship to him at birth.

    It produces a pretty problem, the most important question before our nation. All of congress, the supreme court and the media (who used to be known as the ‘fourth estate’) laugh it off so irresponsibly and despicably by ridiculing citizens who want the article II ‘natural-born citizen’ question answered, or as Clarence Thomas said “We are avoiding that issue.”

    What could be more important that establishing Presidential candidates who bear sole allegiance to the United States of America.

    usurper-obummer has broken the Constitutional article II ‘natural-born citizen’ law; congress & supreme court have cowardly acquiesed; Crux, Rubio, Jindal and Santorum are furthering the destruction of the Constitution by running ineligibly – traitors all.

    ———
    Paula Hoehn

  12. Davey Crockett
    January 18th, 2016 @ 12:30 pm

    Paula: good post!

    And since both of the parents of Cruz were on the voting records, to vote in Canada, as only Canadian citizens could vote, then, we can clearly see that both of his parents had dual loyalty!

    And this is part of his birth problem, since he was born in Canada! This, I believe, is the nail in his political coffin!

    I will contact Trump and ask him if he is willing to file a suit?

    When would this be a proper time to do this, since the caucuses are coming up?

Leave a Reply