What’s next?
Posted on | December 6, 2009 | 16 Comments
Judge Carter’s shameless 180 degrees turn from his assurances at July 13 and September 8 hearings that his court has jurisdiction is not the end, it is only a temporary impediment and fighting it is only one of the first steps in reclaiming America and cleaning up all of this massive corruption and treason. Here are some of the steps I will be taking shortly:
1. On Monday 2 Appellate briefs are going to the 11th circuit court of appeals in GA on 2 cases I handled there
2. Notice of appeal in Carter case will be sent within 1 week.
3. There will be an action in DC
4. there will be a massive campaign under FOIA
5. there will be demonstrations and protests
6. there will be actions in International Courts to expose the violation of Human rights by Obama regime, the tyranny of the Communist Kenyan usurper Barack Hussein Obama and ones who are aiding and abetting him. I retained Mr. Jon Levy, who is licensed in a number of courts, including CA, DC, Great Britain and criminal court of Justice in Hague.
If you want to assist in doc preparations, FOIA mailings, service of process or fundraising, please e-mail me at dr_taitz@yahoo.com. Let me know how you can help, what is your professional background and in what state are you.
Great thanks to Mr. Frank Mannarino who helped in processing some 230,000 e-mails to get the e-mail addresses, which together with nearly 30,000 addresses of media outlets will make outreach possible. We didn’t process all the e-mails. I still have over 80,000. . We should be able to provide reliable mass press releases in the near future.
Orly
Comments
16 Responses to “What’s next?”
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
December 6th, 2009 @ 7:14 am
Quitters never win and Winners never quit. – “Vince” Lombardi
December 6th, 2009 @ 7:48 am
Dr. Orly, we’re all praying for you. We know you’re in a tight spot, now that Judge Carter’s treachery has seemingly ended the case. Butt don’t give up hope just because his spine has turned to jelly. Perhaps this week would be a good time to push a motion to recuse into his chambers.
December 6th, 2009 @ 10:25 am
“May the wind be at your back!!”
I follow your efforts and pray for success in the “DE-Throning” of the USURPER!!
December 6th, 2009 @ 11:26 am
no, this is the week to submit 2 Appeals briefs in GA
December 6th, 2009 @ 12:38 pm
Dr. Orly — What are the 2 briefs to which you refer? I’m confused. Is one of them in the RHodes case?
December 6th, 2009 @ 1:59 pm
Dr Orly Taitz , I am sorry to hear about Judge Carters decision , He surely has shown his Poor decision making abilities , this article dates back even further to Al Gore and his ” Global Warming ” it appears that a lot of data has been falsified , just as now
——————————————
UN climate chief: Hacked e-mails are damaging
Buzz up!374 votes Send
Email IM Share
Delicious Digg Facebook Fark Newsvine Reddit StumbleUpon Technorati Twitter Yahoo! Bookmarks Print AP – FILE – In this Nov. 17, 2008 file photo, U.N. climate chief Yvo de Boer speaks during a news conference …
Slideshow:Climate Change Issues Play Video Barack Obama Video:U.S. Has Big Role at Climate Conference ABC News Play Video Barack Obama Video:The Path Forward FOX News By ARTHUR MAX and KARL RITTER, Associated Press Writers Arthur Max And Karl Ritter, Associated Press Writers – 2 hrs 11 mins ago
COPENHAGEN – The world is entering talks on a new climate pact with unprecendented unity and leaders must seize the moment to create a turning point in the battle against global warming, the U.N.’s top climate official said Sunday. At a news conference, Yvo de Boer called on the 192 nations represented at the U.N. climate summit starting Monday “to deliver a strong and long-term response to the challenge of climate change.”
Even so, he worried that e-mails pilfered from a British university would fuel skepticism among those who believe that scientists exaggerate global warming.
“I think a lot of people are skeptical about this issue in any case,” de Boer told The Associated Press earlier Sunday. “And then when they have the feeling … that scientists are manipulating information in a certain direction then of course it causes concern in a number of people to say ‘you see I told you so, this is not a real issue.'”
E-mails stolen from the climate unit at the University of East Anglia appeared to show some of world’s leading scientists discussing ways to shield data from public scrutiny and suppress others’ work.
Those who deny the influence of man-made climate change have seized on the correspondence to argue that scientists have been conspiring to hide evidence about global warming.
“This correspondence looks very bad,” de Boer said, but noted that the matter was being investigeted by the university, police and the head of the U.N.’s expert panel on climate change. He also defended the research — reviewed by some 2,500 scientists — that shows man has fueled global warming by burning fossil fuels.
“I think this is about the most credible piece of science that there is out there,” he said.
U.S. climate negotiator Jonathan Pershing called the science on global warming “very robust, very substantial.” He told AP that the controversy surrounding the leaked e-mails came at an “unfortunate” time, just before the long-awaited U.N. talks, “but has no fundamental bearing on the outcome.”
Climate skeptics meeting in downtown Copenhagen for a panel discussion organized by a Danish nationalist party said the leaked e-mails highlighted the limitations of global warming research.
“There has been a lot of this kind of activity going on, there has been suppression of view points,” said Roger Pielke, Jr., a professor of environmental studies at the University of Colorado.
Negotiators in Copenhagen are trying to set targets for controlling emissions of carbon dioxide and other global-warming gases, including by the leading contributors, China and the United States. They will also seek agreement on how much rich countries should pay to help poor nations to deal with climate change.
De Boer told a news conference that Copenhagen must be a “turning point” in the international response to climate change. He said climate targets announced in the runup to the summit were boosting the chances of success — even though they fall short of what scientists say is needed to avoid dangerous levels of warming.
“Never in the 17 years of climate negotiations have so many different nations made so many firm pledges toghether,” De Boer said. “It’s simply unprecdented.”
De Boer told AP “it’s going to be two weeks of thorough negotiation to try and get the ambition level up and to get the financial specifics on the table.”
The emissions cuts offered have disappointed scientists and poorer nations facing damaging climate change. They say greenhouse gases, by 2020, must be reduced by 25 to 40 percent below 1990 output to keep temperatures in the less dangerous range of 2 degrees C (3.6 degrees F) above preindustrial levels.
The European Union approaches that target, pledging to cut emissions by 20 percent below 1990 levels, and more if others agree. Awaiting U.S. congressional action, however, the Obama administration could make only a provisional offer of a 17 percent reduction by 2020 from 2005 levels. Against 1990, that represents only a 3 to 4 percent cut, experts say.
The developing world, for the first time, is offering its own actions: clean energy projects and other steps to slow the growth of their emissions.
China says it will, by 2020, reduce gases by 40 to 45 percent below “business as usual,” that is, judged against 2005 figures for energy used versus economic output. India offers a 20 to 25 percent slowdown in emissions growth.
December 6th, 2009 @ 5:26 pm
Keep going Orly. Turn up the heat higher!
December 6th, 2009 @ 5:56 pm
Like many people I was very disappointed in Judge Carter’s decision. Apparently, he doesn’t want to create waves and is willing to allow the United States to suffer so long as he doesn’t have to do the same. Perhaps the most troubling thing about this matter is realizing that if the powers that be will allow a fake, fraud, usurper, and impostor to play at being President then what else are they willing to allow? I say this thinking of the upcoming Copenhagen meeting and all that it represents while bearing in mind the frantic give-aways to Eastcoast/Wall Street banks, healthcare legislation, and cap-and-trade. What you are doing exemplifies the best of American traditions. What a shame that you must struggle against the worst. I continue to wish you success because if you don’t succeed then our fate as a nation grows awfully dark and menacing.
December 6th, 2009 @ 9:23 pm
ONCE AGAIN WE SEE THE JUDICIARY STANDS AGAINST THE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE AND THEIR OATH TO DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION… EVEN THE HOPEFUL PROSPECTS OF A NEW VOICE IN THE BATTLE TO QUESTION THE ELIGIBILITY OF THE USURPER, HAS ONLY PROVEN A LACK OF COMMITMENT TO DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION… THE GREATEST CHALLENGE TO THE HISTORY OF THIS REPUBLIC AND TOO FEW WILL COMMIT TO A DEMAND FOR THE TRUTH …THE TIME GROWS NEAR THAT THE CITIZENS MUST REMOVE THEMSELVES FROM THIS TYRANNY THAT HAS CORRUPTED OUR GOVERNMENT AT ALL LEVELS… THE COMPLEX CONSPIRACY OF THE SOCIALIST / DEMOCRATIC , ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT TAKEOVER HAS STARTED TO REVEAL ITSELF… THE RECENT RELEASED E-MAILS OF THE FALSE GLOBAL WARMING DATA AND THE ALL OUT UNITED NATIONS PUSH TO ACCEPT THIS AS AN IMMINENT THREAT TO THE EXISTENCE OF MANKIND IS QUIT DISTURBING ON IT’S FACE… LET’S ALL KEEP OUR SIGHT ON THE UPCOMING COPENHAGEN GLOBAL WARMING MEETING AND SEE HOW THE USURPER WILL TRY TO ENTER THE UNITED STATES INTO SOME BINDING TREATY THAT WILL WEAKEN, IF NOT DESTROY OUR NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY…THIS TREASON MUST STOP… TO THE MILITARY AND THE MILLIONS OF VETERANS WHO HAVE SERVED I SAY!!! REMEMBER THE OATH YOU TOOK… WE ARE A GREAT NUMBER AND OUR SPIRIT IS STRONG… WHO DARES TO TAKE OUR FREEDOM… ORLY… I HAVE PLACED ALL MY TRUTH IN YOU… NO ONE HAS PROVEN TO HAVE MORE LOVE FOR LIBERTY AND JUSTICE THAN YOU… GOD BLESS AND KEEP YOU … MAY HE SMILE UPON YOU AND SHOW YOU GREAT FAVOR… IN MY LIFE I HAVE NEVER SEEN A GREATER LOVE FOR THE CONSTITUTION THAN IN YOU… PEACE BE UPON YOU…
GOD SAVE THE REPUBLIC AND THE U.S CONSTITUTION…
December 6th, 2009 @ 10:45 pm
how do we get on your mailing list?
December 6th, 2009 @ 11:24 pm
Dr Orly Taitz I am amazed with all that you have done so far , I pray for you and this very just cause ,I am confident that with in time You/We will prevail and when that time does come , You will be a very strong Woman in reclaiming America , Perhaps you will be on the U.S. Supreme Court , after all , you have showed a strong support for the U.S.A. and all that it stands for , Constitution ( unfortunately it appears many Americans do not understand what it means & stands for ) I pray in the name of ” Christ Jesus ” that ” GOD ” may bless you richly , Amen !!
December 7th, 2009 @ 1:26 am
e-mail me to dr_taitz@yahoo.com
December 7th, 2009 @ 4:11 pm
Orly–PLEASE READ BELOW:
https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2009/05/13/obama-manchurian-candidate-obama-russian-puppet-obama-communist-obama-was-member-of-democratic-socialists-party-new-party-the-first-time-i-heard-of-barack-tom-fife-russia-1992/
Obama Manchurian Candidate, Part 3
Communist goals 1963 was a last minute addition, but I am glad that I included it. Read the the list of goals and as your jaw drops, consider how many of these goals have been achieved.
“Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.”
“Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces.”
“Do away with all loyalty oaths.”
“Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.”
“Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum.”
“Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policymaking positions.”
“Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.”
“Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of “separation of church and state.””
“Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.”
Part 3
Here is the essay by Tom Fife. Real or not it is completely believable based on what we know about the past and actions of Barack Hussein Obama.
From Citizen Wells Oct 14, 2008
The First Time I Heard of Barack
Written by Thomas Fife
by Tom Fife
During the period of roughly February 1992 to mid 1994, I was making frequent trips to Moscow, Russia, in the process of
….
….starting a software development joint-venture company with some people from the Russian scientific community. One of the men in charge on the Russian side was named V. M.; he had a wife named T.M.
V. was a level-headed scientist while his wife was rather deeply committed to the losing Communist cause – a cause she obviously was not abandoning.
One evening, during a trip early in 1992, the American half of our venture were invited to V. & T.’s Moscow flat as we were about to return to the States. The party went well and we had the normal dinner discussions.
As the evening wore on, T. developed a decidedly rough anti-American edge – one her husband tried to quietly rein in.
The bottom line of the tirade she started against the United States went something like this:
“You Americans always like to think that you have the perfect government and your people are always so perfect. Well then, why haven’t you had a woman president by now? You had a chance to vote for a woman vice-president and you didn’t do it.”
The general response went something along the lines that you don’t vote for someone just because of their sex. Besides, you don’t vote for vice-president, but the president and vice-president as a ticket.
“Well, I think you are going to be surprised when you get a black president very soon.”
The consensus we expressed was that we didn’t think there was anything innately barring that. The right person at the right time and sure, America would try to vote for the right person, be he or she black or not.
“What if I told you that you will have a black president very soon and he will be a Communist?”
The out-of-the-blue remark was met by our stares. She continued, “Well, you will; and he will be a Communist.”
It was then that the husband unsuccessfully tried to change the subject; but she was on a roll and would have nothing of it. One of us asked, “It sounds like you know something we don’t know.”
“Yes, it is true. This is not some idle talk. He is already born and he is educated and being groomed to be president right now. You will be impressed to know that he has gone to the best schools of Presidents. He is what you call “Ivy League”. You don’t believe me, but he is real and I even know his name. His name is Barack. His mother is white and American and his father is black from Africa. That’s right, a chocolate baby! And he’s going to be your President.”
She became more and more smug as she presented her stream of detailed knowledge and predictions so matter-of-factly – as though all were foregone conclusions. “It’s all been thought out. His father is not an American black so he won’t have that social slave stigma. He is intelligent and he is half white and has been raised from the cradle to be an atheist and a Communist. He’s gone to the finest schools. He is being guided every step of the way and he will be irresistible to America.”
We sat there not knowing what to say. She was obviously very happy that the Communists were doing this and that it would somehow be a thumbing of their collective noses at America: they would give us a black president and he’d be a Communist to boot. She made it quite obvious that she thought that this was going to breathe new life into world Communism. From this and other conversations with her, she always asserted that Communism was far from dead.
She was full of little details about him that she was eager to relate. I thought that maybe she was trying to show off that this truly was a real person and not just hot air.
She rattled off a complete litany. He was from Hawaii. He went to school in California. He lived in Chicago. He was soon to be elected to the legislature. “Have no doubt: he is one of us, a Soviet.”
At one point, she related some sort of San Francisco connection, but I didn’t understand what the point was and don’t recall much about that. I was just left with the notion that she considered the city to be some sort of a center for their activity here.
Since I had dabbled in languages, I knew a smattering of Arabic. I made a comment: “If I remember correctly, ‘Barack’ comes from the Arabic word for ‘Blessing.’ That seems to be an odd name for an American.” She replied quickly, “Yes. It is ‘African’”, she insisted, “and he will be a blessing for world Communism. We will regain our strength and become the number one power in the world.”
She continued with something to the effect that America was at the same time the great hope and the great obstacle for Communism. America would have to be converted to Communism and Barack was going to pave the way.
So, what does this conversation from 1992 prove?
Well, it’s definitely anecdotal. It doesn’t prove that Obama has had Soviet Communist training nor that he was groomed to be the first black American president, but it does show one thing that I think is very important. It shows that Soviet Russian Communists knew of Barack from a very early date. It also shows that they truly believed among themselves that he was raised and groomed Communist to pave the way for their future. This report on Barack came personally to me from one of them long before America knew he existed.
Although I had never before heard of him, at the time of this conversation Obama was 30+ years old and was obviously tested enough that he was their anticipated rising star.”
The interview with Jeff Rense can be heard here along with a copy of the essay:
Jeff Rense interview
For what it is worth, I found the following comments on the American Town Meeting website:
“This is Tom Fife
Background: I have a degree in Physics and have worked primarily in aerospace and software development. In 1991 I became involved with an Englishman who was performing relief efforts into the collapsing Soviet Union. These efforts were performed through Orthodox churches in Britain and the US plus some churches in Germany. Money was raised from all over and sent to Germany to purchase the goods, which were then trucked into Moscow to be distributed by the Patriarchate of the Russian Orthodox Church.While doing all of this, I met many talented people in the Russian Academy of Science and eventually formed a Joint-Venture with some to develop sophisticated software.Dr. M. headed the Russian side. He had a wife whom people told me was a staunch Communist. It is my understanding that she was one of the party officials that worked in a company to be the contact point and keep a party eye on things. She was degreed in her own right and was a solid right hand to her husband.Why did she get so loose-tongued? I am not sure, but there were traditional Russian toasts being delivered through the evening and each of those were punctuated by a shot of very cold vodka. Also, there were some remarks made by an American in our group concerning his observations of the racial make up of the Russian people. This visibly irritated her, and I believe that was the emotional trigger for her to want to predict a racial comeuppance for the white America to which we were returning.Why didn’t I publish the story upon my return in 1992? At that point it was talk. It was very disturbing talk, but I had a life that I was living and that kept me busy while I wasn’t sure how I could every attempt to track down this mystery man she mentioned. In the end, he never left my mind really, but I didn’t ruminate on it, either. I did mention this to my son upon my return and it was because of that that he is my most solid defender. He remembers me warning him in 1992 to beware of a mulatto guy running for president with such and such laundry list of attributes.”
“Tom Fife is legitimate. I worked with him in the aerospace industry that he makes reference to. I was also associated with him in an ultimately unsuccessful research company. I have known Tom since 1982. I have never know him to lie about anything. Everything he says in his original essay and in this blog are consistent with the facts as I know them. He has told me the full names of V. and T. He does not want to reveal their names before they are tracked down and interviewed.
When this is all verified and fully exposed it will be the biggest news in at least a generation.”
December 7th, 2009 @ 6:01 pm
An interesting commentary by Joseph Farah of WND and the Where’s the Birth Certificate Campaign, in which he states that those who incorrectly depict the effort to clarify the Constitutional qualifications of POTUS, such as Bill O’Reilly, are being proven wrong that “eligibility” is “fringe.”
I recommend a reading of it.
https://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=118176
December 8th, 2009 @ 12:01 am
Keep fighting Orly. We will continue to support you in the streets and in the MSM, Boycotts, etc.
December 8th, 2009 @ 1:09 pm
Right on, Lady Liberty. You are an inspiration to patriots and a terror to tyranny. It has been a long uphill battle, but it feels like we are approaching a turning point, due largely to your tireless efforts. Thank you.