Barrister Michael Shrimpton contacted Attorney Taitz in 2013, however never provided any proof of his statements
Posted on | February 26, 2014 | 21 Comments
Press release
British Attorney Michael Shrimpton contacted Attorney Orly Taitz a year ago, on February 7, 2013. He claimed that there was a DNA test proving Obama was not connected to Dunhams, his maternal grandparents. When Taitz requested some proof, Shrimpton provided absolutely nothing. Further, Shrimpton was trying to get money from Taitz to bribe officials in Kenya. If he has a DNA test, why does he need to bribe officials in Kenya? Without any proof of his statements Shrimpton might be either an opportunist seeking money or working for a joined CIA-MI6 operation to try to discredit Taitz and others by bringing forward hoaxes. Shrimpton needs to provide some evidence in order to be believed. However, even without Shrimpton we have ample evidence showing Obama using a stolen SSN and bogus IDs. All we need is one honest judge to act upon this evidence. Taitz is hopeful that one of the courts presiding over one of her cases will be an honest court
—- Forwarded message ———-
From: Orly Taitz <orly.taitz@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:27 PM
Subject: Re: President Obama’s birth in Mombasa
To: michael@mshrimpton.co.uk
Hi Orly!
I’m Michael Shrimpton, a barrister and national security lawyer based in England. I was the CIA’s original source on Obama (they verified in 2007 with a low-copy DNA test). Philip Berg and others have consulted me.
As a courtesy I attach my legal and national security cv’s and a photo.
I would be very happy to discuss any aspect of the fraud with you. It’s about time the truth came out!
Be wary of the ‘supremes’ – one is being leant on, I’m afraid.
best wishes and good luck,
Michael Shrimpton
Comments
21 Responses to “Barrister Michael Shrimpton contacted Attorney Taitz in 2013, however never provided any proof of his statements”
Leave a Reply
February 26th, 2014 @ 8:16 am
House Hearing Live!
House Hearing on Enforcing Pres. Obama’s Constitutional duty
https://nation.foxnews.com/2014/02/26/watch-live-house-hearing-enforcing-pres-obamas-constitutional-duty
February 26th, 2014 @ 9:18 am
Dr. Taitz, please watch for about five minutes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lpzHEIgNvA&feature=player_detailpage#t=4310
February 26th, 2014 @ 9:42 am
this is empty talk, speech that he gave 5 years ago, but did not provide any evidence to support what he was saying. He needs to provide evidence
February 26th, 2014 @ 10:36 am
Isn’t this a very probable coincidence that Obama is going to Saudi Arabia when Zullo & Arpaio are going to release damning evidence on Obama. The rat is going to get away people. Judge Hollander or the Supreme Court in Alabama needs to rule now!!!!!
February 26th, 2014 @ 11:04 am
Also, Saudi Arabia does not have an extradition treaty with us.
February 26th, 2014 @ 11:06 am
we are yet to see anything new coming out of Zullo and Arpaio’s investigation. so far they just confirmed what was available before
February 26th, 2014 @ 12:21 pm
Anyone in our government who is living has to know that we have a fraud in the Executive Branch. They all know but choose to do nothing.
What does that tell you about our elected officials or our judges?
Don’t expect anything from these people.
“If I am not for myself, then who will be for me? And if I am only for myself, then what am I? And if not now, when?”—Hillel
February 26th, 2014 @ 6:29 pm
Recall also, that Lord Monckton stated that the
Obama Kenyan birth archive is located at Kew
Gardens, London. No joke. It exists. Proves
the totality of the Fraud. Book him now, Danno!
February 26th, 2014 @ 6:32 pm
Can someone please go to London and get a
facsimile copy and a microfiche copy? The
road to Gitmo is almost over. IMO.
February 26th, 2014 @ 7:28 pm
copy of what?
Joseph
What planet do you reside on? What do you think, there is a document somewhere available to the public called
“Obama DNA”
Shrimpton is Arpaio#2: all talk, a lot of hot air and no substance, nothing you can submit to court.
If Arpaio has an affidavit of Reed Hays, he should make it public.
If Shrimpton has Obama’s DNA, which does not match his grandparents’ DNA, he should make it public, he claims that for the past 5 years and produces nothing. Also, he needs to explain, where did they get the grandfather’s DNA? The grandfather was deceased for some 20 years.
February 26th, 2014 @ 7:32 pm
IF IT EXISTED, WHY DIDN’T MONKTON GET A CERTIFIED COPY OR ANY COPY?
February 26th, 2014 @ 11:45 pm
He’s just another Birther/grifter.
February 27th, 2014 @ 12:32 am
Dr Taitz,
This is my 1st time to get excited about this issue.
My main focus has always been on Obama is Right Now guilty of Treason under Article III, Section 3 for sending money & arms to the SAME Al Qaeda that are our Enemies. And since he, Hillary, Biden & Kerry have been all over TV telling the World about it, there is ample proof of the Treason.
But back to this issue, sorry to say this but some of your comments come across more like “since I did get him myself then I am not happy about anything or any help from others”.
February 27th, 2014 @ 5:17 am
Orly ..
You’re a sharp lady. This was the first I’ve seen about the DNA. I spotted the video on YouTube.. I think Birther Report. I agree seems rather suspect. His email address is above .. should some of us email him requesting that he provide you will some hard evidence?
Thank for all your hard work 🙂
February 27th, 2014 @ 6:21 am
This man has a lot of information, but I have to agree with Orly (be skeptical) , Obama’s grandfather died in 1992. What banquet did Obama, his grandfather, and grandmother attend where the CIA captured the DNA. I am in Arizona and I do believe Arpaio is about to release universe shattering information, but we will see. We have heard him talk recently and he says they can prove that the birth certificate was released to deceive the American people. Now we all know that, but who do they have who can verify that fact. Are we sure Fuddy was killed or even on that plane.
February 27th, 2014 @ 6:27 am
I’ve been trying to get some objective biographic information on Shrimpton, so far without much success. He is usually associated with theories regarding British conspiracies, including claims that Tony Blair had Dr. David Kelly killed.
The Obama DNA story goes back at least as far as December of 2008 when I wrote about it. There’s no more evidence presented today than there was back then.
I think the big question that casts doubt on Shrimpton’s tale is simply, “why would the CIA be testing Barack Obama’s DNA?” The obvious answer is that there is no reason for them to do it.
February 27th, 2014 @ 6:36 am
Why would CIA check Obama’s DNA?
Clearly CIA knows that Obama is using bogus ID, they know he is a fraud even without the DNA test. Maybe they wanted more proof to use to persuade Obama to play along in rare instances when he wouldn’t.Maybe they needed verification of paternity.
Bottom line, Shrimpton contacted me a year ago, I asked for some proof and he produced nothing
February 27th, 2014 @ 6:39 am
sure, you are welcome to e-mail him and demand proof
February 27th, 2014 @ 7:05 pm
You can read Barrister Michael Shrimpton’s resume’ at https://www.apbspeakers.com/speaker/michael-shrimpton I do not believe he is a fake – he has too many connections with intel in other countries and the CIA. He may not have proof of claims about Obama’s fraud, but I believe he has SEEN the proof that exists. If you listen to some of his videos, he says that when the UK withdrew from its occupation in Africa, the hospital records from Kenya were also turned over to England (among other things). I believe he has seen those records on which he based his statement that Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya, in 1960 (not 1961). Also, it was not the MI6 that got the DNA, it was the CIA. They apparently got it at a fundraising dinner in 2007 or 2008. So the CIA is apparently aware of everything, and just as guilty of the cover-up as Obama, himself.
The DNA that is used to match family members is usually, I think, Mitochondrial DNA. Mitochondria are inherited directly from the mother, so Obama’s grandmother would have been the person used to compare Obama’s DNA. The grandmother was still living after Obama was elected, but I don’t know what the circumstances were that enabled the CIA to have her DNA. Since they did not match, the implication is that Obama is not even the child of Stanley Anne Dunham. Who knows where he was when he dropped out of the skies…
This information has been available for several years, but not widely available. I read about it several years ago, as well as some of the theories of conspiracies that were reportedly conceived decades ago, in Russia.
The videos of Mr. Shrimpton are quite entertaining – I enjoyed listening to him discuss his experiences all over the world. If I were Dr. Taitz, I would communicate with him to see if there’s any way he can help recover some of the proof that exists. Of course, he could be soliciting contact because he intends to share whatever info he gets with the CIA. I’d still communicate with him, but at the same time, I’d be v e r y careful. (Anybody that’s a friend of my enemy is also my enemy.)
February 27th, 2014 @ 7:15 pm
read this blog, Shrimpton wrote to me, I asked for proof and he did not provide any proof. I can’t bring hearsay to court. Moreover, he wanted money. When I asked, for what purpose, he indicated that it is to pay off people in Kenya. If he has the DNA, why not provide it and why does he need to pay off people in Kenya.
July 3rd, 2015 @ 3:43 am
A round of applause for your article. Will read on…