Judge Lamberth needs to issue an order or sign summons for DOJ mail clerk eddy Hase to appear in his courtroom and state who told him to make the complaint and summons disappear
Posted on | October 24, 2013 | 3 Comments
Karl 66 approved |
Submitted on 2013/10/24 at 6:06 pm
“They admit that the mail clerk got the pleadings and signed for them, but they are saying that the pleadings disappeared inside the building and they are asking the judge for 30 days since the government shut-down ended to respond.” So, we are to believe that such politically-sensitive, “hot potato” pleadings simply, inexplicably and spontaneously “disappeared” inside the building all by themselves after Justice Department clerk Eddy Hase logged them in? What an amazing and convenient series of coincidences! Holder’s Justice Department must think that judge Lamberth is either biased and complicit or incredibly naïve. How do they know that the pleadings “disappeared” somewhere inside the building, and not into Holder’s attaché case or automobile glove compartment? If judge Lamberth is a man of integrity who really seeks truth and justice, he will tell them “I simply do not believe your sophomoric stories any more” and, instead of granting their requests, order Justice Department clerk Eddy Hase to name under oath the person to whom he gave those sensitive pleadings after he logged them in. After all, does it really take 30 days to create a new “original” SS-5 registration form or to discover that strangely, alas, the original form has, like other sensitive documents, suddenly and inexplicably “gone missing”? |
Comments
3 Responses to “Judge Lamberth needs to issue an order or sign summons for DOJ mail clerk eddy Hase to appear in his courtroom and state who told him to make the complaint and summons disappear”
Leave a Reply
October 25th, 2013 @ 7:00 am
weren’t these received by the justice department way before the supposed shutdown? this is no different than anyone else signing for a legal summons then ignoring it hoping it goes away
October 25th, 2013 @ 7:20 am
yes, received on July 10, 2013, nearly 4 months ago
October 25th, 2013 @ 7:29 am
The Judge NEEDS to look at The Receit, The DATE it arrived and was SIGNED FOR… The Government WAS NOT SHUT DOWN!!! Make the Ruling in FAVOR of Dr. Taitz. The DOJ CANNOT Bully, AND RUN The Legal System of this Country! They NEED to be Brought Up on CHARGES!