OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi


Shocking manipulation of the docket in the 4th District to postpone Taitz v Obama et al case, which deals with Obama’s use of fabricated IDs and a stolen SSN, while all the other cases scheduled for the same day are being heard. There is a a great concern that there is pressure on the court from Obama administration to get rid of the case by postponing it, reassigning it to different judges, who are pro-Obama, and later dismissing it with some bogus excuse

Posted on | September 3, 2013 | 23 Comments

Press release by Attorney Orly Taitz

Suddenly, on my birthday (yet again, never fails), another road block was placed in front of me.   My September 26 hearing in Taitz v Obama was postponed till October. No explanation was given aside from a short note that it was done

“On the court’s own motion and for good cause, the matter previously calendared for September 26, 2013, at 9:00 a.m., is CONTINUED to the October 2013 oral argument calendar. Notice will be given of the new date and time.”

Why would the court make its’ own motion in a case of National importance and postpone it? What good cause did they have?

Further, yet again a trick was played and I was removed from a notification list, I did not get an electronic notification from the court. I found out about it when Obama’s operatives started gloating, they are connected to the regime, so I checked the docket and so that the hearing was postponed.

 

I checked other cases: they were not postponed. A case scheduled right after mine: G047928  HFOP City Plaza v Brady, Vorwerck and Caspino was not postponed to October. So nothing happened to one of the three judges hearing the case. They will be there hearing all the other cases, 3 in the morning and 6 in the afternoon, so why was the  first case on the docket postponed? You can see that this case G 047928 and other cases scheduled for that day are still on the docket.

08/12/2013 Calendar notice sent. Calendar date:     Thursday, 9-26-13 at 9:00 a.m.

Further, I called 415-865-7744 AOC, Administrative office of courts to find out why yet again I stopped receiving electronic notifications. I left a message with a clerk by name Jane Drew (or possible Yu) it was hard to hear the name. I did not get an answer. It is clear to me that there is a pressure on the Court of Appeal to kill this case by postponing it and later denying with some bogus excuse.

Public cannot influence the court in deciding which way to rule, however the public has a right to know why a case of National importance was postponed by the court without any explanation.  Just posting with words “by courts own motion and for good cause” does not represent a coherent explanation.

I am asking my supporters to call AOC and demand to know why was I removed from the electronic docket notification and call the Chief Judge of the 4th District Court of Appeal, Kathleen O’Leary and seek an explanation why a case of national importance was postponed, while all the other cases are still on the docket.

Also, I suspect that in this court, as in all the other courts, as in all of the other media networks,  there are employees who  are working for the agencies, such as DHS, FBI and so on and they not only are spying on what the judges and attorneys are doing, they are also manipulating dockets, court transcripts (as it happened in Eastern district of PA when 14 pages were removed from the court transcript). I am afraid during the delay the case will be reassigned to another panel wit 3 pro-Obama judges, who will rule in his favor no matter what the law and the facts state. Do you remember Al Capone case? The last moment the jury was switched. I am wondering if there will be a switch for 3 pro Obama justices.

Please, call Chief Judge Kathleen O’Leary at 714-571-2600  and request an answer  why a case of National importance dealing with use of fabricated IDs and a stolen Social security number by an individual occupying the position of the U.S. President was postponed while other cases with no ramifications to the Nation as a whole were kept on the docket. Further this case provided not only evidence of Obama’s use of fabricated IDs, it also provided a sworn declaration from a former relational analyst from NATO pointing to some one and a half million invalid voter registrations in CA.

Similarly Judge Hollander granted Department of Justice an extension of additional time  till September 16 in regards to Obama’s use of  a stolen Social Security number of Harrison Bounel. Taitz v Colvin 13-1878.

No answer from Judge Lamberth in Taitz v Astrue, no answer in Judd case or any other cases. More information on OrlyTaitzESQ.com. Attorney Taitz works on these cases pro bono, donations are appreciated, can be made via pay-pal on OrlyTaitzESQ.com or at the address:

Defend Our freedoms Foundation

29839 Santa Margarita pkwy, ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita Ca 92688

Kathleen E. O’Leary, Presiding Justice Print

Kathleen E. O'Leary, Associate JusticeJustice Kathleen E. O’Leary was appointed to the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three, in December 1999. Her appointment was unanimously confirmed by the Commission on Judicial Appointments on January 21, 2000. In November 2002, Justice O’Leary was elected by the voters of the Fourth District (Imperial, Inyo, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and San Diego counties) to the same office.

In January 2006, Justice O’Leary received the Franklin G. West Award, the Orange County Bar Association’s highest honor. This award is presented each year to an outstanding attorney or judge whose lifetime achievements have advanced justice and the law.

Throughout her judicial career, Justice O’Leary has been active in judicial and law-related education efforts. She is a past member and past chair of the Governing Committee of the California Center for Judicial Education and Research (CJER). She has consistently worked to improve the administration of justice through comprehensive and quality education and training for judicial officers and other judicial branch personnel. In addition to teaching a number of courses for California judicial officers, judicial branch staff, law enforcement and lawyers, she has taught courses for the judiciary of sister states, the National Center for State Courts, and the National Judicial College. In 2003, Justice O’Leary was presented with the Bernard S. Jefferson Award for Distinguished Service in Judicial Education by the California Judges Association.

Justice O’Leary has served by appointment of the Chief Justice as a member of the Judicial Council of California, the constitutionally mandated body responsible for improving the administration of justice in California, on a number of its advisory committees, and on numerous Judicial Council task forces. Justice O’Leary’s contributions to judicial administration were recognized by the Judicial Council when she was named Jurist of the Year in 1999.

Prior to her appointment to the appellate court, Justice O’Leary served on the Orange County Superior Court. She was appointed to the Orange County Superior Court on July 1, 1986, by Governor George Deukmejian, and was in her third term as the Presiding Judge of that court when elevated to the Court of Appeal. Justice O’Leary began her judicial career at the West Orange County Municipal Court in 1981, where she also served both as the Presiding Judge and the Assistant Presiding Judge.

Justice O’Leary attended Marymount College at Loyola University, now Loyola Marymount University and received her juris doctorate degree from Southwestern University School of Law.

Justice O’Leary and her husband reside in Orange County.

Comments

23 Responses to “Shocking manipulation of the docket in the 4th District to postpone Taitz v Obama et al case, which deals with Obama’s use of fabricated IDs and a stolen SSN, while all the other cases scheduled for the same day are being heard. There is a a great concern that there is pressure on the court from Obama administration to get rid of the case by postponing it, reassigning it to different judges, who are pro-Obama, and later dismissing it with some bogus excuse”

  1. Itchik
    September 3rd, 2013 @ 10:04 am

    It was postponed for the simple reason that Obama needs more time to get us into WWIII. It didn’t happen as quickly as he hoped, so he needs to move the hearing out while he waits for Congress to get back from vacation and for the traitors Boehner, Cantor, Graham and McCain to go to work trying to convince the rest of the corrupt scumbags to say yes to war.

    Orly – I do believe that THIS particular motion has Barry worried. This is the one that will get him and he is willing to plunge the entire globe into war to avoid it being heard.

  2. Bruriah Sarah
    September 3rd, 2013 @ 11:19 am

    Dr Taitz

    I don’t know if Mark Levin has the ability, but he does have a lawfirm Landmark Legal that is challenging the current regime’s infringement on the Constitution.

    https://www.landmarklegal.org/DesktopDefault.aspx

    Perhaps they can help.

  3. Birdy
    September 3rd, 2013 @ 11:38 am

    I’m sure that a lot of Americans are finally starting to see that our federal government is one of the world’s largest and most powerful criminal organizations. The Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches work together to run the crime syndicate.

    Justice? Fagettaboutit!

    Someday we will all wake up and wonder why we all keep paying taxes to support a criminal organization.

  4. Virginia W.
    September 3rd, 2013 @ 12:59 pm

    Reminds me of the wizard pulling all the strings behind the curtain in The Wizard of Oz. The wizard does get caught in the end though …

    91% know we should not go to war to benefit Al Qaeda. Rush spoke out about this today ~> https://www.wnd.com/2013/09/rush-syrians-gassed-with-help-from-u-s/

    Keep the faith Orly, justice will prevail and you will be recognized for single-handedly taking down this evil regime.

  5. Alex Gofen
    September 3rd, 2013 @ 1:04 pm

    To Bruriah Sarah: Levin is a constitutional crook. Levin cares about the Constitution only within the prescribed party’s directives. See this: https://www.wnd.com/2013/08/mark-levin-a-modern-day-constitutional-prophet/

    “He is, first and foremost, a constitutionalist” – claims Mr. Limbaugh: Based on what? What we know so far regarding Mark Levin and the Constitution is that during the last 5 years Levin is on a dirty party mission: TO OBFUSCATE AND CONFUSE the audience on the fundamental Constitutional issue of the Natural Born citizenship. In so doing Levin legitimizes backward the party’s 2008/2012 double betrayal. Levin (among others) helped to keep and prolong this unprecedented hoax of the century during these last 5 ugly years.

    Also see this: https://www.wnd.com/2013/08/mark-levin-sounds-off-on-cruz-eligibility/

    That Mark Levin had a chutzpah to dare to say that “He’s sick of “birthers” [i.e. people paying attention to the Constitution]” – did not surprise me at all. Since 2008 I saw the efforts of the “Constitutional specialist” Levin to downplay, or twist, or deny the flying into the face ineligibility of Obama/Soetoro.

    Dwight Kehoe in this article put it the best:

    “The author of books and oratorical purveyor of all things conservative (well almost all things), Mr. Levin found himself being questioned by a real American. And he did not like it. Not one bit.”

  6. The Constitution
    September 3rd, 2013 @ 1:48 pm

    Boy, this thing with the Syrians is going to cause him a great deal of problems!

    I just read yesterday that the House DOESN’T have the votes for his Syrian rant! Good! Let’s kick his butt on this and all other issues!

    The House of Cards is starting to crumble!!!

  7. Jess Riddle
    September 3rd, 2013 @ 4:26 pm

    Dear Orly,
    I called the number you posted for the aoc to inquire as to why your case was removed from the docket for 9/26/13. I reached a lady who told me I had the wrong office and she would connect me to the correct person to help me. the number rang and rang and no one ever answered. I then called the number you posted for judge O’Leary’s office and spoke with a very nice lady named Christy who seemed quite helpful. She could not give me an answer as to why it was postponed but she did some searching and told that the case would be rescheduled for the week of 10/21 although she did not have the exact day yet. She said that as soon as judge was out of court she would call back to answer my question.

  8. Jess Riddle
    September 3rd, 2013 @ 4:41 pm

    Orly,
    Christy from Judge O’Leary’s office called back about an hour later and apologized she said she thought I was a judge when I called earlier and could not find me in the register. I explained that I was a private citizen. She said she would give my message to the proper justice and they would call me back. I JUST BET!

  9. Kay
    September 3rd, 2013 @ 4:58 pm

    We are all disappointed that this case was postponed to October but they had to come up with some reason to snake out of this somehow.

    We have a Muslim commanding the strongest military in the world who has stated in his own book, that if the winds change, he will side with the Muslims.

    That Congress has to even think about this disturbs me greatly. Don’t they know who they are dealing with here? He is not for America so whatever he and Valerie are planning can not be good for the USA. It will be good for the Muslim Brotherhood. I hope they have a trial and that Egypt unveils the evil of this Wizard of Oz.

    Wake up America. Wake up Congress – he’s going to get all of us killed and smiling all of the way.

  10. Rosemary
    September 3rd, 2013 @ 5:08 pm

    Boerhner said today he agrres with the obamao. Postponing this case only reenforces our resolve that Obamao should be booted from the WH. Our Mil is revolting, see infowars. Mil is posting and saying they will not fight for Al Queda and they are right. Media is saying mil is not and so we now we know they really are otherwise why would media even comment? What is the OCT surpise that they want this postponed til then Hummm? We shall see. Mil should come in and remove them all. All the postponements only show they have no defense and we are right. Any idiot can see right thru it now!

  11. SticksNstones
    September 3rd, 2013 @ 5:46 pm
  12. Rod Riddle
    September 3rd, 2013 @ 9:26 pm

    Alex, your right I sent Levin many E-Mails and even mailed him all the evidentiary proof and not a single return E-Mail or letter back about what I had sent him.

  13. David
    September 3rd, 2013 @ 10:30 pm

    Dr. Taitz, there is a lot of speculation going around the net about something going down in October, likely October 1st. I know that is the new Federal Government fiscal year but it is much bigger than that. Something about a national EMP drill along the entire east coast. Just today news broke about nuclear war heads heading to the east coast. And FEMA region III having a lot of doomsday drills in October. Something big is coming and this setback just buys them time to do it. Once it happens and martial law is declared none of this justice system stuff will be relevant anymore.

  14. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    September 4th, 2013 @ 12:18 am

    I don’t know.
    with Muslim-bro buddy, Indonesian-Kenyan anti-American communist in power in power nothing will surprise me

  15. Francisco
    September 4th, 2013 @ 6:49 am

    Has the Alabama Supreme Court decided the case that was pending, which deals with Obama’s fraudulent documents ?

  16. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    September 4th, 2013 @ 7:51 am

    no, they are just sitting on it for half a year

  17. I Barkahn
    September 4th, 2013 @ 8:15 am

    Dr. Taitz,

    I had earlier believed that you various cases would be granted hearing on the merits. This has not happened in any of your cases. Moreover, when apparently compelled to produce documents known to exist, the agency involved has claimed that such documents can, now, not be located. It’s clear that the federal judiciary has decided (or has been ordered) not to grant any of your cases hearings on the merits. Therefore, the federal judiciary will use every conceivable means–delays, refusals to rule, etc.–to deny your cases hearings, and will cooperate with the Justice Department and other federal agencies, in doing so. The question, then, is what tactic(s), legal or (non-law violating) extra legal, can be employed to force the courts to act. Legally assembling to protest outside a Chief federal judges home? Outside the homes of each of the judges assigned to your cases? Using legal means to investigate the lives of the relevant judges and publishing any embarrassing information found, starting with one federal judge? Your supporters might give this some thought.

    Always praying for your success.

  18. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    September 4th, 2013 @ 8:34 am

    this sounds like an incitement from someoneworking for Obama, who is trying to denigrate me in the eyes of the judiciary.
    you know that you cannot stand in front of the home of a judge, this will be viewed as harassment of a judge.
    You are allowed to stand on the public sidewalk in front of the Federal building and demand to expedite the cases of National importance. This is allowed and represents your protected first amendment speech.
    There are other avenues which I will not discuss at themoment

  19. Charity
    September 5th, 2013 @ 9:41 am

    Ok, so I called and spoke to a clerk by the name of Bonnie and she had no answers. She was kind but said it may be due to a scheduling conflict, but as I pointed out, this was the only case to be postponed so that could not be the reason for the delay. She was stumped and said this is does not happen often, but does happen. MMMMM…. Of coarse it happens, when the government uses it powers to abuse the system. It is OBVIOUS that is continuously happens under the Obama administration to hide the deceit and fraud that has been perpetrated upon the American people. The problem with the truth, is it NEVER goes away, just ask Clinton!

  20. Charity
    September 5th, 2013 @ 9:44 am

    Gosh, sorry about my grammar, I am just so flustered about these cases that I jumped the gun on posting my response and neglected to proof read.

  21. I BarKahn
    September 5th, 2013 @ 10:49 am

    Dr. Taitz,

    I am not “someone working for Obama”; I support your efforts and have contributed money to you to aid your in your work.

    My assertion that the judiciary corruptly refuses to hear your cases on their merits–and if held before an impartial jurist would be decided in your favor–is accurate,

    Finally, my suggestions for alternate ways to get judges to honor their oaths of office may be over the top and counterproductive. Sorry.

    It is not at all clear to me that citizens do not have the right, per se, to peaceably protest near someone’s private residence. However, it is probably politically unwise to do so.

    I continue to wish you success in your brave endeavors, as I do for everyone who has worked or is working to bring Obama to justice.

    I BarKahn

  22. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    September 5th, 2013 @ 11:05 am

    As I said, you can protest in front of the federal building, but do not protest in front of the homes of judges. It is in my opinion is in bad taste and it is harassment of their families who have nothing to do with the legal challenges

  23. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    September 5th, 2013 @ 11:07 am

    maybe it is for the best, we will wait till October and see what they do

Leave a Reply