Sven Magnussen is a resident of Sweden, not an employee of the State Department, there is no proof to his story about Catholic charities adopting Obama
Posted on | April 8, 2013 | 18 Comments
An individual by name Sven Magnussen wrote that Obama came to the U.S. as a foreign citizen in 1979, was in care of a catholic charity and was later placed into guardianship of his grandparents. He claims that his Indonesian adoption was annulled, so this story is actually an obot story, as it helps Obama to explain his invalid Social Security number, his Indonesian citizenship, as annulment of adoption supposedly whitewashed both. This story was published in Free Republic and later ORYR (Obama release your records). I hope people running these blogs ask for some shred of proof before publishing stories. I am wondering why ORYR published this story and did not publish a notification of my case being heard on April 22, which is on the court docket and a verified fact? Why did he publish multiple articles about yet another interview by Mike Zullo promising new information, while no new information was ever provided and this interview was just a prelude for yet another fund raiser for Sheriff Arpaio, who did over year of interviews and fund raisers, but never filed a criminal complaint, refused to appear in court and testify and deputised my witness John Sampson in his cold case posse only to tell him not to appear in my cases again and not to testify, as he is now a part of this cold case posse?
1. Sven Magnussen did not provide any proof of this story, it is similar to Linda Adams story and birth in the manger on the premises of the U.S. embassy story or birth on board of Pan Am story. Multiple stories are brought forward without a shred of proof.
2. Sven Magnussen, who from what I recall, posted under multiple names, previously wrote to me and stated that he is a citizen of Sweden and sent excerpts of Swedish papers. So, the new story, that he is a U.S. citizen and an employee of the State Department is not true.
3. I found yet another example of a fraudulent statement by Sven Magnussen. He wrote an article
Taitz v Mississippi Democratic Party Dismissed. In reality this case was not dismissed and is still going on.
Comments
18 Responses to “Sven Magnussen is a resident of Sweden, not an employee of the State Department, there is no proof to his story about Catholic charities adopting Obama”
Leave a Reply
April 8th, 2013 @ 5:00 am
Sven Magnussen is a Magnuissance. Why would Catholic charity adopt Barack Obama? When his mother died, his grandparents took care of him.
Obots will lie for Obama. The biggest liar is the DOH of Hawaii who would cover up for the POS.
April 8th, 2013 @ 5:42 am
Another in the long line of scam artists . . . Arpaio, Klayman, Corsi, Sinclair, Magnussen . . .
April 8th, 2013 @ 5:50 am
Goood thingg we have brave patriots — and ITT graduate — Mr. papa to save our liberties and freedom with his expert technical knowledge.
April 8th, 2013 @ 6:25 am
More disinformation.
April 8th, 2013 @ 7:45 am
If one lie doesn’t convince the people, then Obots just pull another one out of the hat and try it on for size. When are folks in this country going to wise up already — good grief!!!
April 8th, 2013 @ 10:09 am
Have no idea about Seven. Maybe he worked for U.S. in Sweden. Just thought the article was interesting and there is always the possibility that it is true. No stone left unturned, someone may know more or the truth of the matter. Put up for that reason. I do not know the stopping off points, etc. of such a trip. Then maybe there was a transfer.
April 8th, 2013 @ 10:11 am
Just wanted you to know it was out there. You know more about it than I do.
April 8th, 2013 @ 12:15 pm
Supposedly according to Sven Magnussen, in 1971 Barry Soetoro was taken into protective custody by Immigration and Customs, and his legal custody transferred to Catholic Social Services of Conn, and grandmother Madelyn Payne Dunham was appointed his legal guardian. Supposedly, Obama entered the Federal Foster Care program in 1971.
The SSN used by Obama was issued on March 28, 1977 with a number reserved for Connecticut.
Is it logical that the Catholic Soc Serv, the Federal Foster Care, or the grandmother would wait six more years from 1971 until 1977 to apply for a SSN for him by which he could receive many financial benefits?
Paula Hoehn
April 8th, 2013 @ 12:30 pm
O never did anything in life that was nice and/or good! So we’re supposed to believe another “fart in the skillet” knows what he’s talkin’ about??? LOL! 🙂
April 8th, 2013 @ 12:58 pm
Magnussen conveniently places the Catholic Services Adoption Charity in Connecticut where THEY applied for Obama’s social security number. No doubt they also applied for his selective service registration in ’80, and mailed it to him with his laundry.
April 8th, 2013 @ 1:28 pm
This is just another Obotic trick. They put as many ridiculous stories as they can out there. When these stories explode, they make OUR stories look bad as well. We are all tarred with the same brush.
OUR stories are based on fact. Their stories are based on nonsense. They are like a short-fuse firecracker, meant to explode in the hand of whoever lights it.
These stories are planted in order to embarrass us.
No one should publish one of them without clearing through Orly FIRST> She can tell real from not-real.
I wonder if Arpaio and Zullo put Magnussen up to it? Wouldn’t be surprised.
April 8th, 2013 @ 1:42 pm
a good one
April 8th, 2013 @ 1:44 pm
it’s plan Z brought forward after plan A, B, C, D,,,,, all failed
more nonsense
April 8th, 2013 @ 1:53 pm
How many other people went to that “Catholic” school and from where? Who are people who went there, etc.? I never wrote the article, just passing it along out of interest. I do not believe anyone knows enough about this man that can be proved. As for the Sinclair and everyone being a liar except Orly, it seems we are ALL after the same thing, and that being the truth. Too bad all these people do not pool their efforts and work with one and the other.
April 8th, 2013 @ 1:58 pm
I am not an enemy to one group or the other. That is the idea of the left to divide, so would it not be best to see the heart of those trying to get results rather than their methods? We are not working in a normal situation, at best. Anyone willing to stick their necks out deserves some credit. I will not go against anyone trying to get to the truth. I will NOT trust anyone group with the whole truth. I will make my own decisions on that when the time comes. The evidence weighs wholly in the favor of those proving this man is not eligible or fit to be in OUR White House and he should go. That is the bottom line for me, not which group is doing all the right moves and for what reasons that I do not see or are not privy to. I just know those mentioned and Orly are doing work that not many want to stick out their necks for. Let’s not turn this into an infight.
April 8th, 2013 @ 5:44 pm
The secret to winning this is the etymology of natural.
“yearnings to be with her own natural kind” Wordsworth.
April 8th, 2013 @ 6:39 pm
Swedes were never known for being smart.
April 8th, 2013 @ 11:17 pm
Don’t waste time and resources on garbage…