Press release: Commissioner of Social Security defaulted in 2 Circuits, Obama is in default in CA
Posted on | February 18, 2013 | 7 Comments
Press Release
Law offices of Orly Taitz
Commissioner of Social Security administration previously defaulted in RICO (Racketeering case) related to him covering up Obama’s use of a stlen CT Social security number, which was never assigned to him according o E-Verify and SSNVS.
Now he defaulted in yet another circuit: US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Notice of Default and motion for the default judgment was filed in DC.
Obama is currently in default in the US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Judges of these courts have to finally issue a default judgment and order production of all the original documents as part of the post judgment discovery. It is time to put an end to this national nightmare and national disgrace. It is time to end the most egregious case of the elections fraud, forgery and treason.
|
|
General Docket United States Court of Appeals for District of Columbia Circuit |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
IN THE US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
TAITZ
V
ASTRUE
COURT OF APPEALS NUMBER 11-5304
US DISTRICT COURT NUMBER 11-CV-00402-RCL
NOTICE OF DEFAULT/ FAILURE TO RESPOND BY THE APPELLEE
MOTION FOR JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE APPELLANT
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
29839 Santa Margarita, ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
Phone 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ, Appellant herein filed a motion for reconsideration/ motion to recall the mandate due to new evidence and new precedents by this court. This court ordered the Appellee, Commissioner of Social Security Administration to respond by February 11, 2013. As of today, February 18.2013 Appellee did not comply with the court order and failed to respond to the motion. As such Appellant notifies this court the Appellee is in contempt of the court order and in default and therefore the Appellant is respectfully moving this court to grant the Appellants motion for reconsideration /to recall the mandate.
Respectfully submitted
/s/ Orly Taitz, ESQ
Certificate of service
I, Lila Dubert, am over 18 years old, not a party to this case. I attest that I served the Appellee with the attached Notice of Default / Motion for Default Judgment through his Attorney , Helen Gilbert, Deputy U.S. Attorney by first class mail and/or ECF
555 4th Street, NW
Washington, DC
(202) 252-1900
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Lila Dubert
02.18.2013
Comments
7 Responses to “Press release: Commissioner of Social Security defaulted in 2 Circuits, Obama is in default in CA”
Leave a Reply
February 18th, 2013 @ 3:59 pm
What FED bureaucracy is responsible for enforcing court default actions besides the hearing judge?
February 18th, 2013 @ 4:09 pm
Dr Orly,
What is the penalty for defaulting in Federal Court? It appears nothing at this time.
February 18th, 2013 @ 6:01 pm
Need a big shout out: “Book Him, Danno!!!”
February 18th, 2013 @ 10:16 pm
Send the US Marines after him, better yet a drone i think he is a terrorist!!!!!!!!!!!!!
;=D
February 19th, 2013 @ 6:08 am
you don’t have
the necessary predicates
so default is not real
wake up, america!
February 19th, 2013 @ 6:56 am
The fix was in all along, folks. They executed their operation according to plan. It’s Obama’s SEIU Army running the table in DC and throughout the entire federal government. They got their so-called messiah and they just won’t turn on a brother no matter what, even though he’s wasn’t raised in da’hood and by white radical elite communists. It’s a tragedy that they have been brainwashed all these years.
Give up on DC, folks. They are not of us anymore. DC is an elite city-state that issues edicts and rules over the land. They are our taskmasters and we have voluntarily subjected ourselves to them far too long. We no longer have control of our federal government
February 20th, 2013 @ 10:00 pm
Orly: if someone defaults in court, does that mean that You get to go to Discovery?