37 Responses to “Obama-Nazis, brown shirts in the media attack me by calling me a racist and a clansman. Please, contact all the media outlets, particularly in DC, show them all the evidence and help me fight back.”

1. Veritas
   February 8th, 2013 @ 2:42 pm

   How can American Citizens insure that the next candidates for President are “natural born” when odd judges allow for more than TWO parents?

   This from Drudge:
   —–

   Judge approves birth certificate listing three parents…

2. Rob
   February 8th, 2013 @ 2:51 pm

   Little Obama-Commies, they’re scared and the only way these Lib-Tards know how to react is by using the race card. They’re truely morons, probably the product of ebonics.

3. James Smith
   February 8th, 2013 @ 3:19 pm

   It’s illegal propaganda a very serious TV news media Rico crime, like a criminal leading someone “the mark” to the prey “robber”. It’s a signal to me “at this very moment” and to the informed that your making a very big impact Mrs. Taitz and It’s a badge of honor for these complicit enemy foreign controlled news infiltrators to spew unsubstantiated innuendo without any proof or facts of their allegations inadvertently proves that Dr. Taitz is correct and has proven her facts by omissions of facts by the people that now attempt character assassination in hopes to discredit the empirical facts. It’s all rather childish and sociopath type simplistic. I would thank them very much for confirming the truth by omissions and so now they lost the war because all the battle’s have been won. Their inadvertent omissions is the overt acts of the element of the crime to cover-up the facts and so to me you won and have proven your case, period.

4. Codetrader
   February 8th, 2013 @ 3:56 pm

   SATURDAY IS A GREAT DAY TO POST A CRAIGSLIST

   Please invite your friends and family to support Orly.

   copy and paste this entire comment into forums and in the comment sections of Internet Articles.

   Posting an ad at your local Craigslist is working. Make up a great title for the ad.

   It takes us all to make this happen.

   Justice John Roberts is going to review a case on Feb 15th regarding Obama’s use of a fake SS#.

   The case review is real:

   https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12a606.htm

   We do not think Roberts will act so we are demanding that Congress take action.

   Over 26,714 Letters and Emails Sent So Far.

   https://www.petition2congress.com/9026/start-immediate-investigation-barack-obamas-use-forged-ids-ct-ssn/

5. Nutmegger
   February 8th, 2013 @ 4:16 pm

   Hi folks. I just hope that SCOTUS members read the beliefs of many of us American tax payers. I feel that they are aware of Orly Taitz followers and I also hope it will matter on 15 Feb hearing. God help America.

6. Prayerful Hands
   February 8th, 2013 @ 4:19 pm

   OMG! LOLOL! They’re calling our Dr Orly a Klansman? Bet me?! Talk about alinsky puffery!! ………..
   And they’re being referred to as a product of ebonics? LOL!~

7. Gladys
   February 8th, 2013 @ 4:30 pm

   Dr though I do not speak English well informed’m always very conservative publications of what is happening in our great country … and I’ll be very shocked since before November 8, 2008 when I report about the then candidate Obama. I could escape of Cuban communism to reside in the United States … I have worked in political campaigns voluntarily … and devote much of my time informing and advising all who encounter every day.
   I pray that we can return our country to what was long ago, as well as health and strength to you and those who are working to demonstrate the “tyrant” who lives in the White House today … “IMPOSTER IN CHIEF “I would call … I have sent many faxes to our congressmen and I always respond with the same rhetoric, that’s our president … but do not deign to fight to prove the truth of this story …. are corrupt.
   If my economy and would allow me to be part of organized groups to protest on the streets of any city … but unfortunately my financial situation will not allow it.

   Thanking on behalf of conservative citizens of this part of Florida and especially my family and friends.

   Gladys T Ortega
   Tampa, Florida

8. Amused observer
   February 8th, 2013 @ 5:22 pm

   Just gibberish James

9. American Fan of Orly
   February 8th, 2013 @ 6:19 pm

   Off topic:

   But has anyone seen this?

   https://digitaljournal.com/article/342461

   The SSN Database evidently says Lanza was dead the day BEFORE the Sandy Hook Massacre…

10. Karl Wirnich
    February 8th, 2013 @ 6:41 pm

    Trying to find 1 honest judge no days in this country seems to be like mission impossible. But if the liberal leftist media is now starting to call you racist and clannish then you’ve gotten their attention. And if none if that is true then just don’t let it bother you, and just constantly reply with the truth. Look into ways to take recourse against the corrupt judges without sacrificing your own credibility in the process. When they start falling then people will finally start to take notice.

    But until that day keep on fighting for us Orly!!

11. FreemanPaul
    February 8th, 2013 @ 7:36 pm

    JamesSmith is right Orly. You HAVE won. Their inadvertent omissions prove it. That’s how the law works, and everyone knows it.

    James is right you have proven your case period fullstop the end.

12. Curious Dr. Dan
    February 8th, 2013 @ 7:47 pm

    Agree with Mr. Smith’s assessment that Dr. Taitz is correct, and if justice prevails in this matter, BHO will be brought to that prevailing justice.

13. Ann
    February 8th, 2013 @ 8:13 pm

    Interesting article:
    https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2013/02/08/democratic-ohio-poll-watcher-yeah-i-voted-for-obama-twice-n1508509

14. Elizabeth
    February 8th, 2013 @ 8:37 pm

    James Smith,

    What a super all-encompassing
    summation of what is going on in
    the weird world of wacko obots.

    I agree that Dr. Taitz has them
    running scared, and she has the
    strength of character to withstand
    these empty and, as you say, ‘sociopathic’
    verbalizations from those who
    are frantically skimming the bottom of the barrel, desperate to find a raison d’etre.

    Truly, even those skimmers know they are
    out of their depth in the world of
    realism.

    They are to be pitied, just before
    they are ‘planted.’ lol

    Many a time I wish I lived closer to
    her to give moral strength during the
    court appearances. However, we know
    that the Lord is with her, and without
    Him, these heathen roar.

15. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    February 8th, 2013 @ 10:03 pm

    until Obama is out i did not prove anything

16. leo derosia
    February 8th, 2013 @ 10:38 pm

    F all these lying leftist cockroaches. Benghazi, f and f, forgerys , not being eligble anyways with father being foreign citizen. Constant lies and coverups. Donald young murder. Rule of law is dead for demshevik prks like this. A regular citizen would’ve been in prison by now.

17. jim c.
    February 8th, 2013 @ 11:21 pm

    Dr. O don’t not let the trolls wear you down, your fight is true, just and will stand the test of time, we will prevail eventually, somewhere a congressman a senator or a judge will have a moment of conscious to stand up to the tyrant usurper. The bee’s buzz the loudest when the hive is threatened. God speed and history will record you patriotism.

18. James Smith
    February 8th, 2013 @ 11:32 pm

    Dr. Taitz I believe you will get your chance to prove it on the 15th maybe with some omissions are facts help. Omissions is a crime and an element of a crime. Convincing proof is needed on the 15th. We may need to connect obama’s forged birth certificate to provable crimes. obama’s forged birth certificate has been proven to be a fraud but you can’t really connect him to that proven crime because he can say someone put that bogus birth certificate to hide his real identity that they wanted keep secret like he’s really a “silly lie” test tube baby from the planet Klingon, I think you get my point, it’s not really proof obama committed a crime and the same for the fruit of the tree on all the forged documents of no proof that obama violated the law. Proof to me would be something like the documents proving obama is head of the u.n. security council in direct violation of the U.S. Constitution a blatant provable crime. A crime was committed by obama in connection with his name for this u.n. communist world position and I believe it’s a reasonable request for obama to prove who he is to clear his name as an accused espionage national security threat. With 151 judges so far it might be your angle “I doubt it though” I’m just trying to help any way I can. Is it widespread corruption or is what’s needed, proof of obama’s overt acts of crimes to present as proof with your other facts of forged documents as a kicker instead of the main theme?

19. JAK
    February 8th, 2013 @ 11:39 pm

    Orly you have proven/demonstrated that there are millions of people in the USA that have seen the light of your cause and efforts. Perhaps there are not enough yet who have seen the light or are just on the side of evil but you should realize your struggles to date have significance for tomorrow. People are paying attention to Dr. Carson and his subtle rebuff of Obama. When all that you have done and are doing is joined by the grace of God with people like Dr. Carson the USA will be celebrating the work/effort of people like you.

20. blackyb
    February 9th, 2013 @ 4:19 am

    That brow-shirt bunch are desperate. They are making mistakes. They need jailing and kicking out of OUR country.

21. Elizabeth
    February 9th, 2013 @ 4:37 am

    Au Contraire, Dr. Taitz,

    We humbly disagree with you
    on the basis that the proof
    is ‘in the pudding’ for all
    with wisdom and the eyes to
    read, the mind to understand,
    and the ability to recognize
    the ever constant fight of
    good vs. evil. It has ever
    been so.

    Because the justice system
    has been infiltrated by
    corruption, does not mean
    that the truth is tainted,
    too.

    If you have gone to the Petition
    to Congress and read the thousands
    of comments, you know that the
    PEOPLE recognize what you are
    striving to accomplish, their
    gratitude, and their feeling of
    helplessness in the face of what
    has never been seen before on this
    level of evil, in this country.

    It is really astounding. They
    are very, very angry and as the
    snake says, “Don’t tread on me.”

22. Hunk
    February 9th, 2013 @ 5:39 am

    This to Gladys from a fellow Floridian. God bless you, and you are a better American than the average sheople who were stupid enough to put that filthy usurper who squats in OUR White house. And, God bless Dr. Taitz!

23. Rilly Rill
    February 9th, 2013 @ 6:36 am

    Fuck Orly Taitz, she should have been aborted at birth. That is all.

24. Kay
    February 9th, 2013 @ 7:42 am

    Good luck to you, Orly and all of those who are making the trip to Washington. You are taking this message for all of us. Be Loud and Be Heard. God Bless you.

25. Thomas
    February 9th, 2013 @ 8:44 am

    Mrs. Taitz, may I suggest your readers email Justice Thomas, and remind him of what he said… About the “Eligibility” of Obama.
    HE CANNOT put it off any longer!!!!
    Treason is a Capital Offense, he should know that, being a Judge.

26. blackyb
    February 9th, 2013 @ 8:52 am

    More from Give Us Liberty:

    “A stunning Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) report on current legislative actions being considered and/or proposed by the individual States in America states that Virginia appears to be close to executing a warrant against President Barack Obama for the crime of “capital murder” which carries the death penalty.

    According to this report, the top law enforcement officer in Virginia, Attorney General Kenneth Cuccinelli [photo 2nd left], believes he has sufficient evidence to charge Obama with murder over the US Presidents killing of former State resident, and US citizen, Anwar al-Aulaqi.
    Under Virginia law, this report continues, “the willful, deliberate, and premeditated killing of more than one person within a three-year period” constitutes the charging of Obama with capital murder, which carries the death sentence, due to the President’s killing of al-Aulaqi’s 16 year old son, Abdulrahman Anwar al-Aulaqi, who, like his father, was also a US citizen.

    Attorney General Cuccinelli, this report says, has long been critical of Obama and during a 2010 appearance, when an audience member asked, “what can we do about Obama and the birth certificate thing”, responded that if Virginia challenged a law, he could seek to invalidate it because “someone qualified to be President didn’t sign it”, and the possibility that Obama was born in Kenya did not “seem beyond the realm of possibility”.”

27. Virginia W.
    February 9th, 2013 @ 10:16 am

    Dear fellow Patriots:
    and not you Rilly Rill, you are a disgrace to America)

    Linda Jordan has found an honest retired Supreme Court Judge, Honorable Richard Sanders AND Dr. Taitz has Kathleen O’Leary, Presiding Judge of 4th District, who has agreed to reinstate the case. These are milestones!

    “Let us not become weary in doing good, for at the proper time we will reap a harvest if we do not give up.” Galatians 6:9

    I praise the LORD for Dr. Orly Taitz. May He be ever-present.

28. Frankly
    February 9th, 2013 @ 11:01 am

    Frankly speaking…there’s madness in the White House. The “what is the meaning of IS crowd; Kerry, Clinton, Panetta, Pelosi, and all the rest of them are truly delusional to believe that they have the answers to America’s problems. The communist, and alleged murderer of his boy friend, along with a military person who was killed after he decided to fess up about the state dept records alterations etc/
    If any of the above is NOT true… then that fact has to be ascertained in order for the American nation to move back to traditional American values

    America’s problem was resolved in the med 1500s by the first governor of the colonies when he introduced ‘capitalism’ as a social venture to save the colonies. Here’s where America is headed for certain as the “what is the meaning of IS” crowd are pursuing.
    Here’s where America is headed:

    Yesterday
    https://youtu.be/nTY3klgl_KY

    Today
    https://www.myfoxny.com/story/20958959/argentina-freezes-prices-to-break-inflation-spiral

29. usapatriot
    February 9th, 2013 @ 11:38 am

    What is VERY VERY frightening indeed is that the Department of Homeland Security has purchased over a billion rounds of ammunition in the past 9 months. Enough to wage war on US for about 30 years they say.
    WTF????? And no one is reporting on this except for a few online patriot sites.

    Everyone should be calling their LOCAL, STATE media, government and demand an explanation of this purchase, after all, it is OUR money.

30. Denna Miller
    February 9th, 2013 @ 11:43 am

    Dr. Taitz I wouldn’t worry about what they call you. That’s what they call everybody because that is their only defense. Also, you have them scared so I think it’s safe to say that they will call you worse things than that. Don’t worry though,many, many of us have your back.

    The best of luck

31. Leonard McCauley
    February 9th, 2013 @ 2:19 pm

    In my Opinion…There is absolutely nothing wrong with either one of those Words… They have resulted to name calling, because that is the only weapon they have left…

32. js/js
    February 9th, 2013 @ 4:32 pm

    Send Rilly the Traitor to Gitmo, one-way.
    As for the outrageous claims about Ms. Orly,
    The enemy is running scared. They do not realize that Orly was not born in Confederate
    Southern US, never had any slave links, no slaves, either, and no plantations, and
    no relatives with slaves, and comes entirely
    from overseas originally–Romania and Russia.
    Are these people serious??? The only klansmen
    are in the DEMOCRATIC party. Always the case.
    IMO. They are very scared. “Book Him, Danno!!!”

33. Ron Branson
    February 10th, 2013 @ 12:45 pm

    Judicial Accountability Initiative Law (J.A.I.L.)

    (California Initiative – Ver. 2-7-07)

    Preamble. We, the People of California, find that the doctrine of judicial immunity has been greatly abused; that when judges abuse their power, the People are obliged – it is their duty – to correct that injury, for the benefit of themselves and their posterity. In order to ensure judicial accountability and domestic tranquility, we hereby amend our Constitution by adding the following provisions as Sec. 32 to Article I, which shall be known as “The J.A.I.L. Amendment.”

    1. Definitions. To avoid absurd results, words shall be given their plain, ordinary and literal meanings; and where appropriate, the singular shall include the plural and vice-versa. For purposes of this Amendment, the following terms shall mean:

    Judge: A judicial officer hearing and adjudicating legal actions and proceedings within the judicial branch of government (to include arbitrator, mediator, or a private judge, any of whom is assigned by a court to hear involuntary proceedings). This definition shall not be construed to mean trial juror, prosecutor, or any administrative official.
    Material allegations: Statements essential to the claim or defense presented in a pleading filed in court.

    Blocking: Any unlawful act that impedes the lawful conclusion of a case, to include unreasonable delay and willful rendering of an unlawful or void judgment or order.

    Corporate litigant: A party holding a corporate charter, as distinguished from a business license.

    Juror: A Special Grand Juror.

    Strike: An adverse immunity decision or a criminal conviction against a judge.

    2. Exclusions of immunity. Notwithstanding common law or any other provision to the contrary, no immunities shielding a judge from frivolous and harassing actions shall be construed to extend to any deliberate violation of law, fraud or conspiracy, intentional violation of due process of law, deliberate disregard of material allegations, judicial acts without jurisdiction, blocking of a lawful conclusion of a case, or any deliberate violation of the Constitutions of California or the United States. The foregoing judicial misconduct shall not be construed to mean court decisions made within the authorized capacity of a judge.

    3. Special Grand Juries. For the purpose of returning power to the People and ensuring the integrity of the judiciary, there are hereby created within this State three twenty-five member Special Grand Juries with statewide jurisdiction having inherent power to judge both law and fact. This body shall exist independent of statutes governing county Grand Juries. Their responsibility shall be limited to determining, based on the evidence shown on the record, whether any civil lawsuit against a judge would be frivolous or harassing, or fall within the exclusions of immunity as set forth in paragraph 2, or whether there is probable cause of criminal conduct by the judge against whom a petition/complaint is brought before the Special Grand Jury.

    4. Professional Counsel. Each Special Grand Jury shall have exclusive power to retain non-governmental advisors, special prosecutors, and investigators, as needed, who shall serve no longer than one year, and thereafter shall be ineligible to serve; except a special prosecutor may be retained to prosecute to conclusion ongoing cases through all appeals and any complaints to the Special Grand Jury. Each Special Grand Jury may hire clerical staff, as needed, without time limitation.

    5. Establishment of Special Grand Jury Facilities. Within ninety days following the passage of this Amendment, the Legislature shall provide a suitable facility for each Special Grand Jury. Each facility shall be reasonably placed proportionately according to population throughout the State, but no facility shall be located within a mile of any judicial body.

    6. Annual Funding. The Legislature shall cause to be deducted two and nine-tenths percent from the gross judicial salaries of all judges, which amount shall be deposited regularly into an exclusive trust account created by this Amendment in paragraph 10 for its operational expenses, together with filing fees under paragraph 7, surcharges under paragraph 8, forfeited benefits of disciplined judges under paragraph 18, and fines, if any, imposed by sentencing under paragraph 16.

    7. Filing Fees. Attorneys representing a party filing a civil petition or response before the Special Grand Jury shall, at the time of filing, pay a fee equal to the filing fee due in a civil appeal to the State Supreme Court. Individuals filing a civil petition or response on their own behalf before the Special Grand Jury as a matter of right shall, at the time of filing, post a fee of fifty dollars, or file a declaration, which shall remain confidential, stating that they are impoverished and unable to pay and/or object to such fee, pursuant to First Amendment right of redress.

    8. Surcharges. Should this Amendment lack sufficient funding through its fines, fees, and forfeitures (including deductions in paragraph 6), the Legislature shall impose appropriate surcharges upon the civil court filing fees of corporate litigants as necessary to supplement the funding of this Amendment so as not to be chargeable to the public.

    9. Compensation of Jurors. Each Juror shall receive a salary commensurate to that of a Superior Court judge, prorated according to the number of days actually served by the Juror.

    10. Annual Budget. The Special Grand Juries shall have an annual operational budget commensurate to double the combined salaries of the seventy-five Jurors serving full time, which sum shall be initially deposited by the Legislature into an exclusive trust account to be annually administered by the State Treasurer. Should the trust balance, within any budget year, drop to less than an amount equivalent to the annual gross salaries of fifty Superior Court judges, the State Treasurer shall so notify the Legislature which shall replenish the account, prorated based on the actual average expenditures during the budget year. Should the trust balance in any subsequent year exceed the annual operational budget at the beginning of a new budget year, the State Treasurer shall transfer such excess to the state treasury. Except for the initial year, no expenses in paragraphs 6, 7, 9 and 10 of this Amendment shall be chargeable to the public.

    11. Jurisdiction. Each Special Grand Jury shall have exclusive power to appoint a foreperson, establish rules assuring their attendance, to provide internal discipline, and to remove any of its members on grounds of misconduct. The Special Grand Jury shall immediately assign a docket number to each petition/complaint brought before it, unless such case is transferred to another Special Grand Jury to achieve caseload balance. A transfer shall not prejudice a docketing deadline. The Special Grand Jury first docketing a complaint shall have sole jurisdiction of the case. Except as provided in paragraphs 17 and 22, no petition of misconduct shall be considered by any Special Grand Jury unless the petitioner shall have first attempted to exhaust all judicial remedies available in this State within the immediately preceding six-month period. (Such six-month period, however, shall not commence in petitions of prior fraud or blocking of a lawful conclusion until after the date the Special Grand Juries become functional. This provision applies remedially and retroactively.) Should the petitioner opt to proceed to the United States Supreme Court, such six-month period shall commence upon the disposition by that Court.

    12. Qualifications of Jurors. A Juror shall have attained to the age of thirty years, and have been nine years a citizen of the United States, and have been an inhabitant of California for two years immediately prior to having his/her name drawn. Those not eligible for Special Grand Jury service shall include elected and appointed officials, members of the State Bar, judges (active or retired), judicial, prosecutorial and law enforcement personnel, without other exclusion except previous adjudication of mental incapacity, imprisonment, or parole from a conviction of a felonious act.

    13. Selection of Jurors. The Jurors shall serve without compulsion and their names shall be publicly drawn at random by the Secretary of State from the list of registered voters and any citizen submitting his/her name to the Secretary of State for such drawing. The initial Special Grand Juries shall be established within thirty days after the fulfillment of the requirements of paragraph 5.

    14. Service of Jurors. Excluding the establishment of the initial Special Grand Juries, each Juror shall serve one year. No Juror shall serve more than once. On the first day of each month, two Jurors shall be rotated off each Special Grand Jury and two new Jurors seated, except in January it shall be three. Vacancies shall be filled on the first of the following month in addition to the Jurors regularly rotated, and the Juror drawn to fill a vacancy shall complete only the remainder of the term of the Juror replaced.

    15. Procedures. The Special Grand Jury shall serve a copy of the filed petition upon the subject judge and notice to the petitioner of such service. The judge shall have twenty days to serve and file a response. The petitioner shall have fifteen days to reply to the judge’s response. (Upon timely request, the Special Grand Jury may provide for extensions of time upon the showing of good cause.) In criminal matters, the Special Grand Jury shall have power to subpoena witnesses, documents, and other tangible evidence, and to examine witnesses under oath. Each Special Grand Jury shall determine the causes properly before it with their reasoned findings in writing within one hundred twenty calendar days, serving on all parties their determination as to whether or not immunity shall apply as a defense to any civil action that may thereafter be pursued against the judge. A rehearing may be requested of the Special Grand Jury within fifteen days with service upon the opposition. Fifteen days shall be allowed to reply thereto. Thereafter, the Special Grand Jury shall render final determination in writing within thirty days. All allegations in the petition shall be liberally construed. The Jurors shall keep in mind, in making their determinations, that they are entrusted by the People of this State with the duty of restoring judicial accountability and the perception of justice. The standard of authority by which the Jurors shall be guided in making their determinations shall not be opinions of courts, but shall be the Constitutions of California and of the United States and laws made in pursuance thereof. The Jurors shall avoid all influence by judicial and government entities. The statute of limitations on any civil suit brought pursuant to this Amendment against a judge shall not commence until a final determination by the Special Grand Jury. Special Grand Jury files shall always remain public record following their final determination. A majority of thirteen Jurors shall determine any matter.

    16. Indictment. Should the Special Grand Jury also find probable cause of criminal conduct on the part of any judge against whom a petition is docketed, it shall have the power to indict such judge. The Special Grand Jury shall, without voir dire beyond personal impartiality, relationship, or lack of fluency in English, cause to be impaneled twelve special trial jurors, plus alternates, which trial jurors shall be instructed that they have power to judge both law and fact. The Special Grand Jury shall also select a non-governmental special prosecutor and a judge with no more than four years on the bench from a county other than that of the defendant judge, having jurisdiction solely to maintain a fair and orderly proceeding. The trial jury shall be selected from the same pool of jury candidates as any regular jury. The special prosecutor shall thereafter prosecute the cause to a conclusion, having all the powers of any other prosecutor within this State. Upon conviction, sentencing shall be the province of the special trial jury, and not that of the selected judge. Such term of sentence shall conform to statutory provisions.

    17. Criminal Procedures. In addition to any other provisions of this Amendment, a complaint for criminal conduct against a judge may be brought directly to the Special Grand Jury, when all of the following conditions have been met: (1) an affidavit or declaration of criminal conduct has been lodged with the appropriate prosecutorial entity within ninety days of the commission of the alleged crime; (2) the prosecutor declines to prosecute, or one hundred twenty days have passed following the lodging of such affidavit or declaration, and prosecution has not commenced; (3) an indictment, if sought, has not been specifically declined on the merits by a county Grand Jury; and (4) the criminal statute of limitations has not run. Any criminal conviction (including a plea bargain) under any judicial process shall constitute a strike.

    18. Removal. Whenever any judge has received three strikes, the judge shall be permanently removed from office, and thereafter shall not serve in any State judicial office. Judicial retirement for such removed judge shall not exceed one-half of the benefits to which such judge would have otherwise been entitled. Retirement shall not avert third-strike penalties.

    19. Public Indemnification. No judge against whom a petition/complaint is brought, or sued civilly by a complainant pursuant to this Amendment, shall be defended at public expense or by any elected or appointed public counsel, nor shall any judge be reimbursed from public funds for any losses sustained under this Amendment.

    20. Enforcement. No person exercising strict enforcement of the findings of a Special Grand Jury shall be held liable civilly, criminally, or in contempt.

    21. Redress. The provisions of this Amendment are in addition to other redress that may exist and are not mutually exclusive.

    22. Challenges. No judge under the jurisdiction of the Special Grand Jury, or potentially affected by the outcome of a challenge hereto, shall have any jurisdiction to sit in judgment of such challenge. Such pretended adjudication shall be null and void for all purposes and a complaint for such misconduct may be brought at any time, without charge, before the Special Grand Jury by class action, or by any adversely affected person.

    23. Preeminence. Preeminence shall be given to this Amendment in any case of conflicts with statute, case law, common law, or constitutional provision. The foreperson of each Special Grand Jury shall read, or cause to be read, this Amendment to the respective Jurors semi-annually during the first week of business in January and July. Should any part of this Amendment be determined unconstitutional, the remainder shall remain in full force and effect as though no challenge thereto existed.

    Copyrighted Library of Congress 9/12/03

34. TJ Marvin
    February 11th, 2013 @ 3:07 am

    https://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=388715 . Post that link at every site you can make a post at. If you can make a post at WND try changing the option to “best” at the discussion simble, click on discussion, it shows 3 options “best, newest, and popular now” check best then reply to the first poster. Try best and newest both. Also send the link to all your friends.

35. Heidi Ifft
    February 11th, 2013 @ 10:51 pm

    Please instruct as to how to remove myself from your email list. This is my 87th request.

36. Mission: Impossible
    February 12th, 2013 @ 7:35 am

    @ Rilly: It would appear that you have posted an (ENCRYPTED) post? cause here’s what I read that you posted: “Please, Dr Orly Taitz, teach me a very hard lesson in life, since I know I’m such a useless, mindless drone, that needs to be taught right from wrong! Please take me to court and punish me for shooting off my mouth, like a snotty little child!” 🙂

37. John Frigehn Geltam
    February 13th, 2013 @ 7:47 pm

    Ron Branson is a whanker1

Leave a Reply