OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

12.31.2012 letter to the U.S. attorney

Posted on | December 31, 2012 | 14 Comments

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

29839 Santa Margarita, ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688

Attention Deputy U.S. Attorney Edward Olsen

Regarding: Summary of the 12/31/2012 phone conversation

Dear Mr. Olsen, this is to confirm that I called you on 12/31/2012 around 2:20 pm. I advised you that in response to your ex parte motion to extend time to respond to subpoenas, I am submitting amended subpoenas, which will make it easier for the Federal Employees to provide necessary documents without any difficulty or undue hardship.

  1. Instead of Mr. Michael Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security travelling to California to testify or produce documents, amended subpoena would allow him or another official to produce the required original SS-5, Social Security application for Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 at the premises of the Social Security offices in MD on 01/02/2013. Subpoena was delivered by the professional process server and a proof of service will be forwarded to you. There is no disclosure of private information here, as Mr. Obama posted his tax returns on line on whitehouse.gov and did not flatten the PDF file, so the full Social Security number that he used became known to millions of people. Subpoena is issued from the District of Columbia, where documents are requested and therefore enforceable. Though Mr. Obama took off the web site the tax returns later, flattened the file and re-posted it, the information became public knowledge. As we discussed, this is a short notice, however Mr. Astrue or any of his employees, who will actually produce  the document, will not be inconvenienced, as they will not be required to travel and will be asked to produce a document, which would be readily available. Considering that the time is of the essence and this is the most serious case of Social Security fraud and breach of the national security, the importance of the documents and the exigency justify short notice. Please, advise at what time Mr.  Astrue or his assistant will be available on 01/02/2013 to produce the required SS-5 to me or to an expert, who will be there on my behalf.
  2. Amended Subpoena was issued  on director of Selective Service Lawrence Romo with request to produce the original application to the Selective Service for Mr. Obama. Similarly, it was issued from the District of Columbia, being delivered by a professional process server to the premises of the Selective Service. There is no privacy attached as Mr. Obama posted on line the copy of the alleged application. The problem with the copy is that it contains multiple signs of forgery, the most flagrant is the two digit year postal stamp   “80”, while United States Postal office is using a 4 digit postal stamp. I sent to you by Federal Express a video tape with expert testimonies and a video taped press conference  by Sheriff of Maricopa County Joseph Arpaio and investigator Mkie Zullo, who reported to the public and media on their criminal investigation of Mr. Obama’s forged IDs and who  actually  showed on camera how forger used 2008 postal stamp, cut it in half and inversed “08” to obtain “80”.
  3. Based on all of the above, subpoenas will be proper and enforceable. Please, let me know, when is the most convenient time on January 2 for your clients Mr. Astrue and Mr. Romo or their employees  to provide requested documents.
  4. Additionally this is to confirm that I asked for your position on motion to strike the opposition to the TRO on  behalf of Mr. Obama, as he is not sued as a federal employee. Your response is that you do not have a formulated position yet.
  5. Lastly I asked you, if you will be proceeding with the criminal investigation based on evidence of forgery in Mr. Obama’s IDs. You stated that you are a part of the civil division, not criminal division. I asked if you forwarded the complaint and exhibits  to the criminal division, as failure to do so may be seen as subornation of felonies such as elections fraud, Social Security fraud and forgery of IDs with the goal of usurpation of the U.S. Presidency. You asked if I asked you to forward the complaint to the criminal division,  I responded that I am asking you now. You responded with a request to submit it in writing, so you can see, who you can forward this to.
  6. Per your request, I am asking you in writing to forward the complaint, exhibits and the rest of material in the case Grinols et al v Elections commission et al to the criminal division of the U.S. attorney’s office for the purpose of criminal prosecution of Mr. Obama and individuals aiding and abetting him for elections fraud, Social Security fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud and uttering of forged Identification papers and a fraudulently obtained Social Security number with the purpose of committing elections fraud and usurpation of the U.S. Presidency and position of the commander n Chief.  Additionally, some of the individuals aiding and abetting Mr. Obama might be guilty of treason since Mr. Obama is a foreign national, citizen of Indonesia, based on his school records from Indonesia.  Please, advise me the name of the U.S. Attorney in the criminal division to whom you are forwarding the case.

Sincerely,

/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ

12/31/2012

Category: Uncategorized

Comments

14 Responses to “12.31.2012 letter to the U.S. attorney”

  1. Thurston Howell
    December 31st, 2012 @ 5:40 pm

    Checkmate!

  2. Eliminator
    December 31st, 2012 @ 6:14 pm

    I be shooting you soon. You no contact me to pay so I take money to shoot you. Plan to use my nikkon.

  3. cq
    December 31st, 2012 @ 6:18 pm

    God Bless Orly,

    Happy New Year

  4. Ron(Dallas)
    December 31st, 2012 @ 6:19 pm

    EXCELLENT Job Orly! You are keeping them thinking. They can run but can’t hide.

  5. Ray
    December 31st, 2012 @ 6:56 pm

    Brilliant!!!

  6. Braulio
    December 31st, 2012 @ 7:17 pm

    Orly,
    You’re an extraordinary woman earning the respect of all Americans, you’re a real example of what a citizen should be in very, very difficult times. I ask for help from all of us and mainly the protection that only God can provide to heroes such like you.
    Have a happy new year, knowing that while celebrating with your family you may be always thinking on how to save us from ourselves.

  7. Alex Gofen
    December 31st, 2012 @ 7:45 pm

    You are unparalleled dear Orly, following your highest commitment 24/7 up to December 31; May God bless you!

    However attorney Olsen just drags on the time as though he needs your directions what to do with THIS amount of criminal evidence of SUCH a significance. (If such incriminations were brought against anyone of us, he would act upon them very promptly). Since April 2011, hundreds of people reported and tipped FBI about the obvious forgery displayed by the White House. Why the criminal division of US Attorney should be better than FBI in sabotaging and covering up for the greatest fraud visited on this nation?.. Just a fear of being finally exposed as the accomplices may finally push them to do their duty.

  8. Concerned
    December 31st, 2012 @ 8:14 pm

    WOW! The question that has arisen since reading the correspondence between Taitz and the deputy U.S. attorney leaves me cold.

    These guys in the FED bureaucracy have a criminal that has paid apx 2+ millions of dollars to hide his phony derrier on their hands, so why wouldn’t it be prudent to be at the office where records are kept to see FIRST HAND what is there for original documents that will either jail or vindicate the White House STINK?

    These guys have had FOUR years to alter every record in existence that could jail the White House “stink”. They had time and the expertise to create new documents, too.
    Having dealt with some of these ‘fed birds’ over the years… it would take a MISSOURI approach to have a trust in what anyone would produce as documents that are supposed to be originals.
    The attempt to make it easier for the feds to act opens the door to many devious procedures that could produce documents that are re-created instead of the original documents.
    Let’s hope that the feds won’t copy the original docs, but on the other hand the feds could copy the originals and keep the copies in their office while bringing the originals to a document reviewer that is supporting Orly.
    My two cents… and worried about the potential cheating by the feds in bringing true representations of the original documents.

  9. Eviction Notice
    January 1st, 2013 @ 7:40 am

    Great job, Orly! And to find that your subpeona is “enforceable,” is super-fine! And…
    (HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ALL THOSE WHO CARE ABOUT AMERICA!!!)

  10. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    January 1st, 2013 @ 8:04 am

    what is a Missouri approach?

  11. Yoel
    January 1st, 2013 @ 8:58 am

    Missouri is known as the “Show Me” state.

  12. Phil
    January 1st, 2013 @ 12:17 pm

    Orly, I know you don’t want to intentionally make an erroneous statement, so this sentence should be corrected: “Mr. Obama posted on line the copy of the alleged application.”

    Obama was not the one who posted it online. The online SSS application was obtained through a FOIA request in 2008 by some citizen (I forget who) and posted online at a birther website.

    The court will apreciate you clarifying this.

  13. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    January 1st, 2013 @ 1:16 pm

    yes, that is true, it was obtained by officer Coffman, I am in touch with him

  14. Andrew knight
    January 1st, 2013 @ 1:18 pm

    Hello,
    I love your efforts, but how can obooma be prosecuted by the DOJ when holder runs it?

    The guy needs to be inpeached.
    God bless you and your work.

    Pastor Knight

Leave a Reply