Exposing another lie, another hoax
Posted on | February 17, 2012 | 17 Comments
Bari Shabazz- Kingston Jamaica
A couple of months ago another story surfaced: claiming that Obama was a child of Malcolm X and that he was born in NY. I was pretty suspicious and skeptical about this whole story from day one, as it conveniently gave Obama an American birth and an American father. A number of people bought this story:hook, line and sinker without doing any background check. The story was originally started by a woman by name Martha Towbridge (I might be mistaken in spelling of her name). This story was picked up by attorney Mario Apuzzo. I have to say, that I respect Mario, he had one eligibility case 3 years ago and I believe he is really a good man, but on this story he bought the premise without checking. A researcher ordered a SS-5 for this Bari Shabazz and we found out that he was not born in NY Jamaica hospital, but in Kingston, Jamaica, in West Indies, meaning that even if this whole hoax was a true story, it would not help Obama, as Jamaica is not part of the US and he was not born to US parents.
I have to give it to Obama’s operatives, they definitely work for their pay. Aside from attacking me with horrendous tirades of cussing words, aside from buying corrupt judges and corrupt officials, they don’t stop coming up with stories, trying to create for Obama a US birth and a US citizen father.
I remember a year or so ago they sent me another story, saying that when Obama was born in Kenya, he was born on the territory of the US embassy in some abandoned manger, where Ann Dunham gave birth. These boys wouldn’t stop at making up a story about his birth, they also tried to give this fraud a Jesus-like quality. Now they tried to make up an American birth and an American father and a connection to a famous black hero by making up Shabazz story. I exposed this hoax as well.
Nice try boys! Give it a rest. I was not born yesterday. Maybe yesterday morning, but not yesterday evening. Go find another puppet to promote. This one is broken beyond repair. But have a nice weekend, though. You worked pretty hard. 🙂
Orly
Comments
17 Responses to “Exposing another lie, another hoax”
Leave a Reply
February 17th, 2012 @ 9:57 pm
If Obama is lying about who he really is, that is, using multiple identities as appears to be the case, isn’t that just as much of a crime and a reason for him to be removed from the presidency as not being natural born?
Suddenly discovering he has a different father at this point in the biggest fraud in history would not fix anything, even if it were true.
February 17th, 2012 @ 10:03 pm
Since the media has totally failed in its job of vetting Obama, there is much speculation on his origins. All of the Obama documents and family photos have been proved to be faked or forged.
Since the governor of Hawaii claims NO Obama BC here and only an altered birth index and altered birth announcements which are neither confirmed nor denied by the Hawaii newspapers exist, the Hawaii situation looks like identity theft. The FBI used to handle that!
Mario had put substance to the Obama Dunham divorce papers but Hawaii never had a Mental Cruelty grounds for divorce and the signatures don’t match those of Stanley Anne Dunham in high school. Polarik debunked the Soetoro Dunham divorce papers for bad signatures. He also debunked the Obama birth certificate.
Mario says Obama has ‘conceded’ that he was born in Kenya! Why would anyone believe that without a grain of documental proof?
Promoting the fiction that Obama’s father was a Kenyan is promoting The Obama Story fable which has no documents or photos to support it.
February 17th, 2012 @ 10:09 pm
Way to go Orly!!!!
February 18th, 2012 @ 6:31 am
Ah, now it makes sense! The Malcolm X thing was put out there by the White House. What won’t they say?!
The family resemblance between Obama and his white grandfather is striking.
February 18th, 2012 @ 7:10 am
All this is occuring and we have an imposter in the White House because the MSM (I call them the Criminal Media) hasn’t done their job in vetting Obama…Contrast and compare Watergate to what we are witnessing today…Complete governmant run media. First we need to disengage from the MSM and use our financial muscle to demonstrate that we will not tolerate their dereliction of duty. Our cable bill funds the fraudlent media so a good first step is to cancel cable. Not clicking on media websites will reduce their “hits” and the money they collect from advertisements. Obviously these steps will have meaning only if implemented by millions of Americans. There are millions of Americans who love our country and Constitution. Hopefully we can elevate this issue to our friends and take one more step to getting our country back.
February 18th, 2012 @ 8:27 am
BTW, Hoax, Kenya wasn’t KENYA until Obama was about 2 years old. Another mistake on that mistake of a BC.
Another mistake on mistake of a BC: He lists himself as African-American and in 1961, the term was NEGRO.
February 18th, 2012 @ 9:59 am
Even Freerepublic has banned any questioning of The Messiah’s eligibility.
*sigh*
February 18th, 2012 @ 10:26 am
Firstly, he did not list himself as African American”. He described himself as ” African”.
Secondly, if you were a Kenyan native why would you call yourself British or even British East African. The entire African population of that country did not agree with the colonists and would never have called themselves anything other than African or Kenyan. He saw himself as Kenyan, just as someone born in Ireland before independence would not call himself British.
February 18th, 2012 @ 10:38 am
@Maria Duasari….Freerepublic banning free speech and expression? Seems very un-American….Simple solution for Americans who believe in and stand on the 1st Ammendment….Ban Freerepublic from our computers….
February 18th, 2012 @ 11:01 am
Thank goodnes you laid that one to rest, Orly!
February 18th, 2012 @ 12:06 pm
OustTheOs prevaricates:
BTW, Hoax, Kenya wasn’t KENYA until Obama was about 2 years old. Another mistake on that mistake of a BC.
Why do you birther turds lie so blatantly when you can be so easily debunked?
https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/2060/Something-of-Value/
D: Richard Brooks. Rock Hudson, Dana Wynter, Sidney Poitier, Wendy Hiller, Frederick O’Neal. Robert Ruark’s novel transformed to screen, sharply detailing brutal Mau Mau warfare in Kenya. Hudson and Poitier are fine as British colonial farmer and his childhood friend; Hiller memorable as widow struggling to retain dignity and spirit.
This movie was shot in 1957 and was based on a 1955 book.
February 18th, 2012 @ 3:30 pm
Scourgeoffools…It doesn’t really matter when Kenya was called Kenya…On Obama’s so called birth certificate (which he displayed on the offical white house site)states that Obama’s father is a Kenyan …that alone makes him not eligible for the office of the president…”debunk that fact”…
February 18th, 2012 @ 5:01 pm
Jim F…. in 1961 the pre-identified category used in the U.S. (which includes Hawaii) for the black race was Negro. This description was specified by the U.S. Census instructions and used by all the states. The Registrar who filled out the Birth Certificate could only use Negro; not black or african or african american or kenyan. Parents do not have a choice on how to describe their children on official records such as birth certificates. That is why the use of “african” is a tip that something is wrong with the birth certificate.
February 18th, 2012 @ 8:41 pm
Scourgeoffools, The independent Republic of Kenya was formed in 1964.
Time to cancel your Netflix.. No history lessons there.
February 19th, 2012 @ 11:10 pm
I can’t vouch for much of what Miss Tickly says as I have not personally done the research, but she does make an interesting observation about the raised embossed or debossed seal issue. Personally I have downloaded the long form and found faint evidence of a seal…far too faint to determine if it is embossed or debossed. It is present in one of the illustrator layers as a few scattered dots. If you take the region of the dots and enhance the image by boosting the contrast all the way you will see the faint image of a seal. In my opinion it appears to be deliberately hidden by either ironing the background security paper or by some other means. I say this because the document shows other features which would tend to make me think if there was no attempt to conceal the seal it would have shown itself clearly and with good contrast. That is why I suspect that it was somehow flattened so as to conceal its presence. Anyway I found Miss Tickly’s comments quite intriguing even if I cannot verify very much of it.
February 21st, 2012 @ 4:40 pm
John-
Ditch the sarcasm, why do you even bother?
Orly is dispelling all these garbage theories being ‘tested’ and dangled out to the public to see which one might stick, it shows how desparate
Obama and his muppets are getting.
February 29th, 2012 @ 5:45 pm
Steve M – you’re not smart enough to recognize sarcasm, so shut the hell up!