Attacks on the truth to schield Social Security fraud by Obama
Posted on | December 7, 2011 | 17 Comments
Just yesterday Philip Berg reappeared after he and his sidekick Gary Kreep spent most of their time harassing me, my family, investigator Sankey and all the dtabase companies with a bogus law suit. Today Berg reappeared, trying to tell people not to believe their own eyes, claiming that Obama’s social security number is vaid. It is pretty much as valid as the social of his illegal alien aunt, living in the public housing at our expense and using IN social, while she was never a resident of IN, like the social of his recently arrested illegal alien uncle and like 100 social security numbers of his friend William ayers, who in his book Fugitive Days admitted to creating over a 100 fraudulent social security numbers.
Please, look at the facts again and the documents again.Barack bama Selective service full document
Comments
17 Responses to “Attacks on the truth to schield Social Security fraud by Obama”
Leave a Reply
December 7th, 2011 @ 7:27 pm
According to the Numident Codes, Mr. Ludwig’s SSN was issued to him in the early 1950s. He was issued a duplicate Social Security card in 1976.
December 7th, 2011 @ 7:33 pm
you are absolutely right, we never said anything different
December 7th, 2011 @ 9:19 pm
You posted that he got an SSN in 1977. But he actually got it in 1954. Only a new card was issued in 1977.
An elderly person cannot simply sign up for Medicare without having paid into Social Security for at least ten years. To pay into Social Security he or she had to already have an SSN and a salaried job or be sekf employed and paid self employment tax.
Your theory doesn’t account for this.
December 7th, 2011 @ 9:27 pm
no, there are multiple women, who never worked in their lives or people, who worked for cash.
December 7th, 2011 @ 9:36 pm
Thayne Doak said Obama used Ludwig’s SSN.
Hopefully Thayne Doak will show us her evidence.
December 7th, 2011 @ 10:10 pm
I don’t believe Thayne Doak said that, I am sure the issue was twisted by obots
December 7th, 2011 @ 11:53 pm
I won’t speak for Thayne Doak, but there are letters to the editor signed by her that say Obama used Ludwig’s SSN.
December 8th, 2011 @ 4:46 am
If they never worked, or worked for cash, then they did not earn Social Security credits. What you are suggesting is not possible under the law. You need to rethink your story since this aspect is legally wrong.
December 8th, 2011 @ 5:02 am
Do you think it is possible that the number you tried for Obama is no longer valid on eVerify because it has been posted all over the internet? Just from my point of view, if someone had posted my SSN, I would request a new one from Social Security. If that was the case, then eVerify would not be able to find my old number. My husband was a victim of identity theft and was issued a new number and when we run his old number, it comes back with an error.
December 8th, 2011 @ 5:35 am
no, it showed as not valid before I ever made my findings public. I caught him committing SSN fraud and I have all the docs. This number is only the tip of the iceberg. There is much more
December 8th, 2011 @ 5:54 am
Obama’s aunt is an illegal aliens, never worked, but is getting SSSA benefits. Patti or Jodi or whatever your real name is, drop it. We both know Obama is caught. The question is how bad is the fallout and how many people will go to prison and for how long. I suggest, that his attorneys start working on a settlement and resignation.
December 8th, 2011 @ 5:56 am
signed by whom? We know that Obots twisted the story to make it sound like Obama is using Ludwig’s social. The only thing is left to do, is to trace the IP addresses of the obots in question. Don’t go there obots, you will burn and crash
December 8th, 2011 @ 6:28 am
If an illegal immigrant stole my SSN and used it, I’d get a new one. I sure hope if the illegal tried to use it again to get a job it would show up as not valid. I think that makes sense to a lot of people. That’s probably why the obots keep saying that it was just changed after you made his SSN public.
I have to admit I wondered if they were right. But now you say “it showed as not valid before I ever made my findings public.” I hadn’t seen you say that before. In light of this, their argument now seems like just an obot lie.
But right now the motions and evidence you submit to courts don’t say that. So the judges might believe the obot version of events. I think it’s very important that you add to your future pleadings the date you first publicized his SSN on any webpage and the date you first checked it on e-verify.
December 8th, 2011 @ 6:59 am
sounds like a comment, made by an obot fishing for information for trial. Some cards I keep close to my chest
December 8th, 2011 @ 7:21 am
I’m not an obot fishing for information for trial. I just didn’t know you had checked e-verify before you told people the SSN and so I’d begun to believe the obot version might be right.
Maybe it’s better for us if you keep it quiet and wait till you’re in front of the judge. But in the video I saw of the HI hearing, the judge kept saying things like “you can’t argue that because it’s not in the motion.”
Maybe I’m just not understanding how things work but it seems like if you hold the card too close to your chest, when you try to play it, the judge will say you can’t.
December 8th, 2011 @ 2:17 pm
e 2718, or whoever you are
nice try
next time try better 🙂
December 8th, 2011 @ 6:23 pm
Once again, God bless and speed to you. YOur doing the dirty work for millions of innocent Americans who have no clue what is happening to their Govt. Thank You!
My question is what is it that makes fairly responsible people ignore law and facts. Judges, attorneys who know better, Nancy Pelosi, Fuddy, Fukino? Govt. officials, dept. heads at the state and federal level. As Tim Adams reported before the election, everyone in Govt. in Hawaii knew it ( Obama’s ineligibility)…so many in important positions have lied and twisted the truth. They have all risked their careers and lively hood on a lie….and I feel, knowingly so! Is it their perspective of truth is more important than the actual truth? Is it blind allegiance to ideals, not facts? Im sure to many it is pure ignorance. But to many powerful in the right places in Govt. and industry, they have to know the truth. Why risk everything on….of all things… A LIE ?