3 Responses to “For now the strategy worked for Obama: when you google him, you get the announcement first, then obamacare, then birth certificate”

1. abasdf
   May 1st, 2011 @ 10:22 pm

   You are a psycho. Please die.

2. Maulder
   May 2nd, 2011 @ 1:58 am

   Oh, yeah, Orly! If this C.O.L.B. was REAL, that would’ve been the #1 item to broadcast to the nation!

   It doesn’t take (the Late) Jeanne Dixon with her crystal ball to realize that this was a “prank” of sorts! To try to salvage his Presidency! What a “circus!”

   X-Files…

3. Starla
   May 2nd, 2011 @ 2:49 pm

   MUST SEE VIDEO WITH ADDITIONAL PROOF THAT OBAMA’S WHITE HOUSE RELEASED SELF-VETTED & SELF-VERIFIED ‘BIRTH CERTIFICATE’ IS A FORENSIC FORGERY!!

   “WASHINGTON TIMES REPORT – NEWLY RELEASED OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE FORENSIC FORGERY”

   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9a-cFUfZ9Q&feature=player_embedded

   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

   “WORLD INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES: OBAMA’S LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE A RANK FORGERY”

   http://www.dailypaul.com/163097/world-intelligence-agencies-obamas-long-form-birth-certificate-a-rank-forgery ”

   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

   MUST SEE OUTSTANDING VIDEO!!!!!!

   “OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE FAKED IN ADOBE ILLUSTRATOR – OFFICIAL PROOF”

   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s9StxsFllY

   Look & listen carefully to the 3:27 mark where the narrator states, “Now, allegedly this birth certificate was “scanned” onto a computer. If you know anything about scanners and scanning inside of Adobe Illustrator, it keeps it on one layer! It doesn’t…there is no such thing as technology for a scanner that will separate parts of the images to different layers. SO, IF THEY SCANNED THIS, WHICH THEY SAY THEY DID, IT WOULD ALL BE ON ONE LAYER. However, here there are multiple layers as you can see, and even inside of these, there’s more! I’m just going to show you, ah, this is the original one. Right here, the bottom layer is the first layer they started out with…”

   And, see & listen to especially at the 4:38 mark: “This is added on the computer. This isn’t even penmanship, it is added on a computer,” and look at the 5:04 mark for information as well!!

   Here is the person’s name and email address who created this video and posted it online, if people have any further questions.

   Albert Renshaw, 2011 (albertiphonedeveloper@yahoo.com)

   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

   “DR. RON POLLAND EVALUATES OBAMA’S “BIRTH
   CERTIFICATE” – THEY FORGOT TO FLATTEN LAYERS”

   Introduction By Sharon Rondeau

   April 28, 2011

   http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/04/28/dr-ron-polland-evaluates-obamas-birth-certificate/comment-page-2/#comment-54052

   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

   “OBAMA’S ONLINE ‘BIRTH CERTIFICATE’ DOCUMENT ‘WAS CHANGED’ – ANALYSIS RAISES POSSIBILITY CONTENT OF TEXT WAS ALTERED”

   By Bob Unruh
   © 2011 WorldNetDaily
   Posted: May 01, 2011

   Read More Here: “ONLINE ‘BIRTH CERTIFICATE’ DOCUMENT ‘WAS CHANGED’” http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=293421#ixzz1LE5awV2D

   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

   “UPDATE: GUIDE TO WHAT IS WRONG (SO FAR) WITH THE OBAMA LONG-FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE – ANALYSIS OF IMAGE POSTED ON THE WEB ON APRIL 27, 2011”

   By John F. Sweeney, ©2011

   http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/04/30/guide-to-what-is-wrong-so-far-with-the-obama-long-form-birth-certificate/

   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Leave a Reply