from Sonoran news by Linda Bentley
Posted on | March 31, 2011 | No Comments
.
Meanwhile, Hollister has been following other challenges to Obama’s eligibility and noted Dr. Orly Taitz’s recent Freedom of Information Act complaint against Social Security Administration Commissioner Michael Astrue regarding the Connecticut-
Meanwhile, Hollister has been following other challenges to Obama’s eligibility and noted Dr. Orly Taitz’s recent Freedom of Information Act complaint against Social Security Administration Commissioner Michael Astrue regarding the Connecticut-issued Social Security Number (042-68-4425 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 042-68-4425 end_of_the_skype_highlighting) Obama has been using, based on sworn affidavits from two licensed private investigators, Susan Daniels and Neal Sankey. She also verified the information with a third source, John Sampson, a retired Department of Homeland Security senior investigator.
Through various sources, in addition to Obama’s use of the number, they determined the same SSN was originally issued in Connecticut sometime around 1976 to another individual who was born in 1890.
Records indicate Obama didn’t start using this particular SSN until 1980, although there are several other numbers associated with his name, none of which were issued in Hawaii, or any other place Obama has ever lived or worked.
Obama’s use of the Connecticut-issued SSN can be readily verified by anyone as it is imbedded in his fraudulently created Selective Service System records.
Hollister provided Sonoran News with a copy of the results from the Social Security Number Verification System (www.SocialSecurity.gov) used by small businesses to verify employment eligibility, using Obama’s name, birth date and the Connecticut-issued SSN. The results came back as “Failed” with a Verification Results Code 1, which is defined as: “SSN not in file (never issued).”
Time will tell if SCOTUS will ultimately be the ones to decide Obama’s constitutional eligibility.
Comments
Leave a Reply