read Devvy Kidd’s article about Roberts meeting Obama right befoe tSCOTUS had conference on my case Lightfoot v Bowen deeming Obama ineligible
Posted on | June 28, 2012 | 6 Comments
Devvy Kidd — Chief Justice John Roberts meets Obama in private
Bill Van Allen
10:50 AM (1 hour ago)
https://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd428.htm
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
6 Responses to “read Devvy Kidd’s article about Roberts meeting Obama right befoe tSCOTUS had conference on my case Lightfoot v Bowen deeming Obama ineligible”
Leave a Reply
June 28th, 2012 @ 2:19 pm
Yea. I heard they spent their time telling Orly Taitz jokes.
June 28th, 2012 @ 5:29 pm
Matter of fact, Orly, this caused me to write my first complaint to the dudes in Washington. I first asked Roberts if he knew he was committing a crime by metting with the president elect. Then I asked him, as an American Citizen, if he would be kind enough to tell me the subject of the meeting.
I think we can all concluded that Roberts has a huge golden parachute to retire with. Agree?
June 28th, 2012 @ 7:59 pm
I’ll bet that conference, Orly, was incredibly poignant? And how many times has Obama met with Roberts? We all know that he took the oath (twice!)…how strange!
And remember, Orly, how Roberts wouldn’t get back with you, when you tried to discuss something of importance with him? Then, we read in a post or two today that Roberts was like “The Inside Guy” for Obama all along!
I think it’s wild that these people are so willing to “auction their souls?” Aren’t they making enough $$ at the job, for life?? I’m all for impeachment of the (5) who voted for the healthcare law today!
June 28th, 2012 @ 8:32 pm
From the time of Obama meeting in chambers with justices to the time Roberts redid the swearing in oath using doctored wording to satisfy a Muslim, Roberts should never have been considered/taken as one dedicated to the law of our Constitution. Robert’s is a cheap liberal mole with something that is hanging around his political neck. Might be investments or just old fashioned buying. Recall this is another appointee of the ‘new world order’ club. In another vein of thought I am beginning to think that history will show the Statue of Liberty has been turned into a Trojan horse for socialist/communist purposes.
July 1st, 2012 @ 3:49 am
Where the hell do you people get off lying about Roberts to try to prove your conspiracy theory? There is video of Justice Roberts giving the oath of office to President Obama and it has NOTHING to do with an oath that would reflect him being a Muslim. You obviously know nothing about the Muslim religion if you think any real Muslim would pretend to be Christian, ignoring the tenets of the Koran. Your ignorance is overwhelmed only by your blind hatred for a man who has done nothing to deserve the animosity leveled at him by RWNJ and ideologues.
As for Justice Roberts not replying to Taitz, who the hell made her a privileged citizen of the U.S., entitled to personal phone calls and mail from the very, very busy Chief Justice?
Considering Taitz seditious behavior, she’s far more fortunate that he didn’t order her imprisoned for the same. Keep sticking your neck out there, Orly. One of these days, it will get chopped off. You continue to lie about President Obama, cherry-picking data from forms that are not legitimately obtained in order to attempt to support your half-baked theories. Get the hell out of MY country if you don’t like the way things are done. You don’t belong here anymore than anyone else who badmouths our officials, calling for them to be hung because they dared to properly rule against your error-filled motions and legal garbage. Burn in hell, bitch!
July 1st, 2012 @ 5:13 am
I never called for anyone to be hung. I called for corrupt bureaucrats to be tried for treason for allowing a criminal like Obama with all forged identification papers on the ballot and in the White House.
Punishment for treason is a life in prison or death penalty. It is up to the jury to decide what penalty to give.
Each and every thing I said was a correct statement of fact