I get hundreds of such letters and that is what gives me strength to tolerate all the Obama’s scum that is attacking me
Posted on | May 20, 2009 | 13 Comments
Orly
I am so impressed with your efforts singlehandly to try to the truth of Obama’s nationalty out in the open. it is so obvious that he has something to hide and the depots who create the smoke screen are in cahoots with him.
I am the mother of 3 boys and I get sick thinking about what they will face here in Amerika when they are my age. I try to educate them to open their minds and not believe the mainstream press but at this point they think I am a bit ” off”.
Keep fighting the good fight , we are so lucky to have you in our corner
sandi
Sandi Schultz
Risk Mgmt/ Guest Relations
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
13 Responses to “I get hundreds of such letters and that is what gives me strength to tolerate all the Obama’s scum that is attacking me”
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
May 20th, 2009 @ 8:48 pm
Dr. Orly – Australia just put up an article that I put up this morning. I closed with a suggestion for Gov. Perry that I hope he will follow.
Google News Search – Texas Governor Perry
California’s Dysfunctional Family – Obama and Congressional …
Australia.TO – 55 minutes ago
I believe Texas Governor Perry should contact Dr. Orly Taitz or Philip Berg and join their efforts seeking enforcement/protection of the United States …
https://www.australia.to/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9914:californias-dysfunctional-family-obama-and-congressional-motivations-in-bailing-them-out-&catid=53:jones-zach&Itemid=122
Thank you for all you do Dr. Taitz.
Sincerely, Zach Jones
May 20th, 2009 @ 9:30 pm
Orly,
Any feedback on your suggested media blitz. Has anyone been able to reach Hannity, Oreilly, Rush or Beck? And if so, what have been the results? You should keep up the media blitz.
May 20th, 2009 @ 10:01 pm
Mrs. Taitz, I remember when the electoral college had occured and you were looking to identify a certain individual raising his hand. I’m not certain if you had reached a conclusion as to the votes legitamancy or to locating the individual. Nevertheless, in following the many lawsuits I had contacted Mario Apuzzo by e-mail today about the electoral college, as this is a major point in his lawsuit. Mr. Apuzzo graciously answered and sent a link of the US CODE; Title 3,15 Counting Electoral Votes in Congress. I watched the vote on C-SPAN and watched it again and again looking for the gentleman to raise his hand, never did see it. I do remember, Vice President Dick Cheney saying, “without objections”. Of course the US CODE; states he was to ask for objections in the proceedings which he never did. I finally feel that this lingering issue to me has been resolved. If I may ask. This should anul the electoral vote, making every following occurance null and void. Also, for kicks – Arlen Spector was also listed as an elector. I am truly sorry for the Common Man that his government is an abomination – the”laughing stock of the world”, literally. The best of course I’m sure and, “a chuckle”. Many thanks, for your resolve in our defence. Sincerely, James
May 20th, 2009 @ 10:06 pm
Dr. Orly, First thank you for your hard work to defend our country against this corrupt administration.
Second, I happened across the information below. I hope this doesn’t affect the lawsuit in any way.
Thank you so much, Denise Hoagland
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Presidential Records Act Amendments of 2009 (Introduced in House)
HR 35 IH
111th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 35
To amend chapter 22 of title 44, United States Code, popularly known as the Presidential Records Act, to establish procedures for the consideration of claims of constitutionally based privilege against disclosure of Presidential records.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 6, 2009
Mr. TOWNS (for himself, Mr. ISSA, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. CLAY, and Mr. SHERMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
——————————————————————————–
A BILL
To amend chapter 22 of title 44, United States Code, popularly known as the Presidential Records Act, to establish procedures for the consideration of claims of constitutionally based privilege against disclosure of Presidential records.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Presidential Records Act Amendments of 2009′.
SEC. 2. PROCEDURES FOR CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS OF CONSTITUTIONALLY BASED PRIVILEGE AGAINST DISCLOSURE.
(a) In General- Chapter 22 of title 44, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
`Sec. 2208. Claims of constitutionally based privilege against disclosure
`(a)(1) When the Archivist determines under this chapter to make available to the public any Presidential record that has not previously been made available to the public, the Archivist shall–
`(A) promptly provide notice of such determination to–
`(i) the former President during whose term of office the record was created; and
`(ii) the incumbent President; and
`(B) make the notice available to the public.
`(2) The notice under paragraph (1)–
`(A) shall be in writing; and
`(B) shall include such information as may be prescribed in regulations issued by the Archivist.
`(3)(A) Upon the expiration of the 20-day period (excepting Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays) beginning on the date the Archivist provides notice under paragraph (1)(A), the Archivist shall make available to the public the record covered by the notice, except any record (or reasonably segregable part of a record) with respect to which the Archivist receives from a former President or the incumbent President notification of a claim of constitutionally based privilege against disclosure under subsection (b).
`(B) A former President or the incumbent President may extend the period under subparagraph (A) once for not more than 20 additional days (excepting Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays) by filing with the Archivist a statement that such an extension is necessary to allow an adequate review of the record.
`(C) Notwithstanding subparagraphs (A) and (B), if the period under subparagraph (A), or any extension of that period under subparagraph (B), would otherwise expire after January 19 and before July 20 of the year in which the incumbent President first takes office, then such period or extension, respectively, shall expire on July 20 of that year.
`(b)(1) For purposes of this section, any claim of constitutionally based privilege against disclosure must be asserted personally by a former President or the incumbent President, as applicable.
`(2) A former President or the incumbent President shall notify the Archivist, the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate of a privilege claim under paragraph (1) on the same day that the claim is asserted under paragraph (1).
`(c)(1) The Archivist shall not make publicly available a Presidential record that is subject to a privilege claim asserted by a former President until the expiration of the 20-day period (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays) beginning on the date the Archivist is notified of the claim.
`(2) Upon the expiration of such period the Archivist shall make the record publicly available unless otherwise directed by a court order in an action initiated by the former President under section 2204(e).
`(d)(1) The Archivist shall not make publicly available a Presidential record that is subject to a privilege claim asserted by the incumbent President unless–
`(A) the incumbent President withdraws the privilege claim; or
`(B) the Archivist is otherwise directed by a final court order that is not subject to appeal.
`(2) This subsection shall not apply with respect to any Presidential record required to be made available under section 2205(2) (A) or (C).
`(e) The Archivist shall adjust any otherwise applicable time period under this section as necessary to comply with the return date of any congressional subpoena, judicial subpoena, or judicial process.’.
(b) Restrictions- Section 2204 of title 44, United States Code (relating to restrictions on access to presidential records) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
`(f) The Archivist shall not make available any original presidential records to any individual claiming access to any presidential record as a designated representative under section 2205(3) if that individual has been convicted of a crime relating to the review, retention, removal, or destruction of records of the Archives.’.
(c) Conforming Amendments- (1) Section 2204(d) of title 44, United States Code, is amended by inserting `, except section 2208,’ after `chapter’.
(2) Section 2207 of title 44, United States Code, is amended in the second sentence by inserting `, except section 2208,’ after `chapter’.
(d) Clerical Amendment- The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 22 of title 44, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
`2208. Claims of constitutionally based privilege against disclosure.’.
SEC. 3. EXECUTIVE ORDER OF NOVEMBER 1, 2001.
Executive Order No. 13233, dated November 1, 2001 (66 Fed. Reg. 56025), shall have no force or effect.
May 20th, 2009 @ 11:45 pm
Fortunately, “Obama” and his shady pals haven’t figured out a way to keep us from communicating via talk radio or the Internet.
I just sent this email to my Radio Industry Email List:
“To Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity, and Rush Limbaugh.
Your audience wants you to address the “Obama” eligibility issue.
Please stop pretending that you don’t have a clue on the “Obama” eligibility issue.
Recorded on 19 May 2009.
The Conspiracy of Facts
By Dr. David Manning
9:59
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQAlczc9T8U
Posted by ATLAHWorldwide”
Here is my Radio Industry Email List:
elrushbo@eibnet.com
rush@eibnet
hannity@foxnews.com
oreilly@foxnews.com
me@glennbeck.com
glennbeck@foxnews.com
george@coasttocoastam.com
artbell@mindspring.com
ian@coasttocoastam.com
georgeknapp@coasttocoastam.com
lisa@coasttocoastam.com
tom@coasttocoastam.com
lex@coasttocoastam.com
shawn@coasttocoastam.com
ben@thetalkstation.com
cdb@thetalkstation.com
info@talkradionetwork.com
listeners@radioamerica.org
mark@usaradio.com
mim@wrif.com
news@theradionetwork.com
raymond@raymondarroyo.com
tim@usaradio.com
schnittshow@aol.com
bwiley@rendabroadcasting.com
May 21st, 2009 @ 12:10 am
Dont worry, they all think that. My 33 yr old daughter told me she thought I was a bit off mentally until recently over all of this. She said “Mommy I am so sorry, I thought you were going crazy!” Together we went and bought some awesome shotguns! They come around and dont stop making them think and reject the main stream media message. We are crushing the MSM like the bugs that they are!
May 21st, 2009 @ 1:38 am
Pastor Manning challenges Sean Hannity to have Orly Taitz and Alan Keyes on his show at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQAlczc9T8U
May 21st, 2009 @ 2:32 am
James says:
May 20, 2009 at 9:30 pm
Orly,
Any feedback on your suggested media blitz. Has anyone been able to reach Hannity, Oreilly, Rush or Beck? And if so, what have been the results? You should keep up the media blitz.
James,
Have Orly send you my email address. We are getting some interesting feedback and the Media Blitz will continue indefinitely. I have much information to pass along to you. Orly, could you give James my email address? Please comment back if you have any questions or just pop me an email. Thanks!
May 21st, 2009 @ 8:54 am
Orly
I have been hearing about this new book that Barry is coming out with. It is an extension of his book that Ayers wrote for him, (hehe) What if that is his way of sticking a so called long form COLB? It will be shrunk to fit the page. Do you know how many dumb people that will say, “I told you so?”
I bet that moron looks in the mirror and says, “mirror, mirror on the wall, who’s the fairest of them all?”
May 21st, 2009 @ 4:13 pm
James,
Objections used to be asked on the floor when the electoral votes were tallied.
This practice was changed several presidents ago.
Now, the individual state electors must provide, in writing, any objections when sending in their certified state’s tally.
Objections, if any are made, now accompany the elector’s vote.
When Cheney said “without objections” this is because no objections were included when the votes were sent in.
So it was all done legally and per the Constitution.
Only the procedure for logging objections was changed from verbal at the time of counting elector’s votes to one that requires objections to be filed in writing beforehand.
Do you really think Cheney.. who doesn’t like Obama at all… would ignore any objections had their actually been any?
I highly doubt it.
May 21st, 2009 @ 4:57 pm
Dr. Orly,
I wish you the best in your drive to expose the usurper sitting in the WH with his Weather Underground wife, but I don’t think you or we should be under any illusions that his exposer will make a big difference in the future of the U.S.
With the control in the hands of the Tri Lateralist, CFR, Builderberg group, and dozens of other evil doers, removing one pretty face, OBH, and Michelle Robinson Obama, won’t make a hill of beans difference. They will still end up with a scoundrel under their control.
Sorry to say it but, things have gone too far for the good people of this country to regain control. I will keep fighting in the only way I know how, but I don’t have alot of faith that getting the Obamas out of the WH will change anything.
God Bless you and your tremendous effort to save the United States of America. You are definately a heroin to many Americans.
May 21st, 2009 @ 4:58 pm
this is why obama wants digitize everything so he can justify all his missing history, I had it all digitzed and it disappered the original papers. sorry folks, thats whats coming watch!!!
May 21st, 2009 @ 8:38 pm
The Media Blitz is starting to show real results. Please send Orly money people. The Future of Democracy lies in the hands of the readers of this blog. Only Orly has the truth and we need to back her 110%.
I spend most of my days trying to get through to Rush. Once Rush is on board, we win.
A friend of mine is the brother of a veteran and he says military families are all waiting to help Orly.