Grinols Response from Congr Issa and Congr Goodlatte
Posted on | April 5, 2013 | 12 Comments
Grinols Response from Congr Issa and Congr Goodlatte
Category:
Comments
12 Responses to “Grinols Response from Congr Issa and Congr Goodlatte”
Leave a Reply
-
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — Indiana Trial of Obama, 2nd Copy
Evidence on Barack Obama
Obama File with Exhibits
Affidavit of Paul Irey
Obama file Exhibits 1 - 7
Obama file Exhibit 8 - Part 1
Obama file Exhibit 8 - Part 2
Obama file Exhibits 9-13
Obama file Exhibits 14-21
Request for Docs under FOIA and Emergency Motion for Reconsideration
Exhibits sent to Inspector Generals and CongressPetition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
URGENT! PLEASE SIGN PETITION TO CONGRESS
OrlyTaitzEsq.com
TAITZ REPORT
Subscribe today to stay in touch with our progress. Send this channel out to your email lists. Thank you for your support. CHANNEL (Google Plus) SUBSCRIBE TO YOUTUBE Official Facebook
Recent Posts
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available! DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling. --------- To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
Pages
- #409755 (no title)
- …Defendant Obama defaulted in Grinols et al v Obama et al
- …Grinols Subpoenas
- ..Grinols Order, Summons, TRO, Complaint
- .Affidavit of Mike Zullo
- 1. Judd v Obama
- 2. Farrar v Obama
- 3. Taitz v Sebelius
- 4. Taitz v Indiana, IN Judge Orders Trial
- 5. Taitz v Astrue
- 6. Mississippi Filed Complaint Update
- 7. Taitz Walters v Sec of State Kansas
- Videos
- Video: Orly before NH Election Committee
April 5th, 2013 @ 2:58 pm
thks Orly you have bigger balls than all these corrupt crooked politicians and Feds
April 5th, 2013 @ 3:17 pm
If this letter was written by an aide, I would expect the phrase, “please to not communicate with me my ordinary mail”. This is written by an attorney!
Looks to me like they’re looking for a way out of having to respond. What could be more “material and relevant” than the enemy within. Seems their “privileges and rights” include not having to honor their oath of office.
I think it prudent to write to todd and let him know why “the People” think it’s relevant.
April 5th, 2013 @ 4:12 pm
The only thing material to the work of Congress, that would be related to the questions asked in Dr. Taitz subpoena, would be, in my opinion as a legal dilettante, the fact that a District US Attorney misrepresented the facts to a judge, that he was representing the Representatives in Congress in that Court, without their consent or knowledge of that fact. If that is not a crime, a law should be enacted to make it so.
April 5th, 2013 @ 7:11 pm
I write on behalf of the Honorable Bob Goodlatte, United States Representative for the
6th congressional district of Virginia, and the Honorable Darrell Issa, United States
Representative for the 49th congressional district of California, regarding subpoenas ad
testfficandum that we have become aware of in connection with the above referenced proceeding.
Both subpoenas are dated April 3, 2013, and are returnable on April 18, 2013.
Rule VIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives requires all Members of the
House to determine, among other things, whether subpoenas issued to them are “material and
relevant” and “consistent with the privileges and rights of the House.” See H.R. Rule VIII(3),
1 13th Cong. (2013) (copy enclosed). To assist Congressmen Goodlatte and Issa in making these
determinations, please provide me a proffer, in writing, of precisely what information you seek
as well as how and why it is material and relevant to your case.
I would appreciate hearing from you by no later than Wednesday, April 10,2013. Due to
the stringent mail delivery procedures put in place by the House after the anthrax and ricin
attacks several years ago, please to not communicate with me my ordinary mail at the address
above. Rather, please use fax (2021226-1360) or electronic mail
(todd.tatelman@mail.house. gov).
Re:
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to hearing from you
April 5th, 2013 @ 8:51 pm
Orly,
You are one strong woman. I pray everyday for you and the work that you do.
Joanne
April 6th, 2013 @ 4:46 am
Just the mere mention of anthrax and ricin is insulting! And it does look like they’re trying to get out of showing up.
April 6th, 2013 @ 6:31 am
no, I talked to their attorney, he is very well aware of what is going on.
They will testify if the judge is not complicit and not seeking to cover up the crime of the century
April 6th, 2013 @ 7:06 am
Mrs. Taitz, the one question that should be asked of this Attorney, and The Represenatives is “Who Do They WORK For?”
It seems to me that Politicians Live and Work for Themselves… The People are NOT being Represented.
April 6th, 2013 @ 7:18 am
What do you mean by ‘they will testify’?
Testify to what and when and where?
I thought they had simple YES or NO questions to answer in writing – by sometime in March.
???
April 6th, 2013 @ 8:34 am
Awesome!! The ball is starting to roll now. We love you Orly.
April 6th, 2013 @ 11:48 am
Orly,
When men in responsible positions are faced with certain evidence of extreme crimes and they begin to discuss Rules of Evidence these are not Statesmen, but imposters with no intention of defending the Constitution nor the Law. If they were men of Honor, several years ago they would have called Hearings before their respective Committes and issued Subpoenas to all involved. Don’t trust them in the least amount.
June 16th, 2013 @ 10:07 am
Hahahahahahaha, this politics related YouTube video is in fact so comical, I loved it. Thanks in support of sharing this.