9th Circuit allowed an over-sized brief (longer brief) from Attorney Taitz in Grinols v Electoral College, Obama, Sec of State
Posted on | March 24, 2014 | No Comments
13-16359 James Grinols, et al v. Electoral College, et al “Clerk Order Filed”
Inbox
|
x |
|
11:23 AM (22 minutes ago)
|
|||
|
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing.
The following transaction was entered on 03/24/2014 at 11:23:25 AM PDT and filed on 03/24/2014
Case Name: | James Grinols, et al v. Electoral College, et al |
Case Number: | 13-16359 |
Document(s): | Document(s) |
Docket Text:
Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: GS): The appellants’ motion to file an oversized reply brief of 7,679 words is granted. The reply brief submitted on March 14, 2014 shall be filed. The appellants are reminded that all briefs must include a certificate of compliance of compliance regarding the word count in the brief. See 9th Cir. R. 32-1. With regard to the appellants’ alternatively to divide the reply brief in two, the appellants are reminded that if multiple answering briefs are filed, an appellant or group of jointly represented appellants is limited to filing a single brief in response to the multiple briefs. See 9th Cir. R. 28-5. [9027946] (RT)
Notice will be electronically mailed to:
Mr. Edward Alan Olsen, Assistant U.S. Attorney
Doctor Orly Taitz, Counsel
George Michael Waters
Comments
Leave a Reply